In the books of first and second samuel there several attitudes toward having a monarchy in Israel. In the begining of 1 samuel the people of Israel are practically begging for a king ( Samuel 1:5 “...Give us a king to judge us like all the other nations have”). Samuel replied to the people warning them the dangers of having a king and that the king would make the people work where they don’t want to work, draft their sons into the army, and take their livestock. Even after listening to what Samuel had to say the people still wanted a king, and eventually they got what they wanted in Saul. Initially the people are pleased with the tall, humble, and handsome king, but the attitude starts to change when he takes a foolish oath ( Samuel 1:24
This religious aspect to these absolute monarchs caused the people to have respect for their rulers. People thought “Fear God, Honor the King.” (Document 5) It meant that people should have faith in their Kings and fear the course that God has set for them. They believed that monarchs were sent to do the good deeds of god and that using their power for evil was a horrible sin.
Whenever law ends, tyranny begins (John locke). In our government laws are made by a group of people who meet and develop solutions for problems. They get the approval of different people in charge, and the words becomes law. But what happens when there is no president elected by the people, and instead a family that passes the power generation to generation, thinking only what is best for them and only them, as they know no better. That moments is when things turn bad and problems start to appear, here and there, everywhere.
A King does what he wants no matter who or how many people oppose his
The federalist papers was a series of newspaper essays that have become a classic of American political. James wants to redefine the term “Republic”. Power to govern must come from the govern’s citizens. James Madison starts the most popular federalist papers by saying that one of the strongest arguments is the fact that it establishes a government to be able to control the violence and damage caused by fractions which is a group of people who gather together to protect their political opinions and views. Factions will always be a issue to deal with because the citizens will always have different opinions, some own more land than others, and some are more wealthy than others.
The Federalist Papers are a series of eighty-five political essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in support of the U.S. Constitution. In No. 51, James Madison argues that, Ambition must be made to counteract ambition”. Madison disagreed with the popular opinion that democracy required virtuous citizens that were actively involved in politics in order to be successful. Instead, Madison believed that it was the way power was spread within the government that determined how successful the democracy was. But if Madison is right and virtuous citizens are not required for a successful democracy, how does this affect citizenship and popular participation in politics?
In The Prince they talked about how a king doesn’t want to be hatred by his people but have them respect him so he can’t be to nice. So a king in this book they should be stingy, cruel, breaking promises, and having a great staff of people. Stingy would be better than being nice to your people shows them that you are the king and they need to respect you and your decision. Cruel is better than being nice also if someone takes sometime from you there has to be something done about it! Morality and ethics are not a big deal to break in The Prince breaking promises so it will benefits the king is okay to do!
This displays the King's character,in being unwilling to let the people opinion and assemble against his ruling. He inhibited
Andrew Jackson was a wild, energetic president that had the will and stability to make the United States a stronger, and more unified nation. A good democracy, in general, requires equal rights, an educated and strong leader, peace, stability, checks and balances, voting rights, and power in the hands of the people. Having a good and strong democracy also requires leadership of the people, and for them to stand up for their rights. In Andrew Jackson’s presidency, he is known for always striving for what he wants, even if the people of the United States didn’t agree with him.
Each king’s different approach to obtaining the obedience of their subjects (one of the qualities of kingship in Trew Law)
Shanti Gurung History 101 Final Exam Professor Montague 12/06/2015 1. As some 16th and 17th c. leaders sought to strengthen their control over both the legislative and administrative machinery of their respective kingdoms, others witnessed the destruction of absolutism as their principle governing philosophy. What obstacles did English royalty face in their effort to establish an absolute monarchy in the early decades of the 17th century? (Hint: Remember the tactics monarchs employed to achieve absolutism.)
1. How did Solomon turn ancient Israel into a state? What happened after his death? Solomon became King of Israel and divided the kingdom into twelve districts.
At the start of the early-modern period of European history, feudalism was dying, and countries looked to strong, centralized governments for leadership. The popular political theory to address this new development was absolutism. Absolute monarchs reduced the power of nobles in order to consolidate the nation’s leadership under one banner. During the 17th and 18th centuries, Europe’s political landscape was dominated by this form of government. Monarchy was seen by the early modern Europeans as the best form of government for a variety of reasons.
To many, monarchs were God 's form on earth. King James I of England said that "The state of monarchy is the supreme thing upon earth; for kings are not only God’s lieutenants on earth, and sit upon God’s throne, but even by God Himself they are called gods..." (Document 2). Like King James I, people believed monarchs were needed because they had power like God. Kings and Queens were essential and brought goodness to the land.
The Philistine military was crushing the Israelites and this became the catalysis for realizing that they needed to utilize the leadership of a king to survive (Tullock, & McEntire, 2012). Samuel was an instrumental figure in getting to this realization, although he knew having a king would be dangerous. However, through the peoples will, he was the first to appoint a king. As for a king maker, Samuel was know to be a divine psychic
Why should one remain loyal to a king? If one remained loyal to a king, what would you think of one who wanted a rebellion? Think of absolute power or two. Think of the trouble of the russian servants or, for the element, American slaves. Were the British that awful?