This humanities passage is from a speech by Susan B. Anthony, a 19th-century women’s rights leader. Susan B. Anthony, the leader in the women’s rights movement, has voted at the last Presidential election, and was branded as a criminal who refuses to follow the U.S. Law. However, in this speech, she asserts that she has not committed crime, but only is simply aware of her and all United States citizens’ rights. Anthony, as one of the suffragettes, justifies her decision of voting and clarifies her firm favor of women’s suffrage. In this passage, she uses various types of argument in order to convince the audience via three strategies: appeals to authorities, stylistic choices, rhetorical question, and appeal to emotions.
First of all, Anthony appeals to authorities starting from the second paragraph. In the second paragraph, Anthony uses quotation from the preamble of the Federal Constitution in order to provide evidential support to her thesis statement in the previous paragraph. She argues how it was lawful to vote at the last Presidential election and how it was not a commitment of crime by this quotation from supreme law. Since she refers to Federal Constitution, the United State’s most fundamental principles which should be the highest pursuances, this citation gains a high level of credence. She quotes “We, the people of the Unites States, in order to…… promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of
…show more content…
Anthony, who fights for the women’s rights and suffrage, successfully convinces her audience by using effective strategies of argument. Throughout the speech, she makes stylistic choices within the diction cited from an authority with strength. She also never misses to appeal emotionally to the listeners. At last, she uses a rhetorical question by affirming the pain of women, who suffers from the deprivation of their rights that should have been secured. Anthony justifies her decision of action by articulating with fair
For a very long time, the voting rights of the citizens have been a problem in the US. It started out with only men with land being able to vote, and then expanded to white men, and then to all men. However, women were never in the situation, they were disregarded and believed to not be worthy enough to have the same rights as men. They were essentially being treated as property, therefore having no rights. But, in Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she hits upon the point that women are just as righteous as men to uphold the same rights.
Susan B Anthony was one of the prominent figures in the 19th century at the women’s suffrage movement to introduce women’s suffrage in the United States. Suffrage means the right to vote in political elections. Anthony spent much of her life on social causes. She partnered with Elizabeth Cady Stanton to lead the National American Woman Suffrage Association in order to fight for women’s right. Anthony never married because she could not consider marrying a man who was not as intelligent as she and she don’t want to marry a fool just to get married.
The theme of both of the Passages; The Watsons Go to Birmingham and Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote is being different. In Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote, Susan B Anthony is Different because she is a girl. Back in the 1800s women were treated unfairly. The Watsons have colored skin and have to drink out of different fountains,Go to different schools and also they have to eat in the “back” instead of eating at a table. Although they have the same theme they don’t take the same risks.
Woman Suffrage Women's right activist, Carrie Catt, in her speech, “Address to Congress on Women’s Suffrage”, explains how woman suffrage in inevitable. Catt’s purpose is to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. She adopts a confident tone , uses direct quotations, and appeals to logos in order to convince Congress that it is time for woman suffrage. A confident tone is adopted by Catt throughout her entire speech to congress. Catt opens with “Woman suffrage is inevitable.”
In America’s history, child labor was fiercely criticized. Many activists of child labor laws and women’s suffrage strived to introduce their own viewpoints to the country. Florence Kelley was a reformer who successfully changed the mindset of many Americans through her powerful and persuading arguments. Florence Kelley’s carefully crafted rhetoric strategies such as pathos, repetition, and sarcasm generates an effective and thought provoking tone that was in favor of women’s suffrage and child labor laws. Florence Kelley uses pathos continuously throughout her speech.
Dr.king 's speech was one of the most powerful speeches ever done carried down to history. the purpose of the speech was to get equal civil rights for everyone. In the speech Dr.King mentioned Abraham Lincoln because Lincoln passed the law to free the slaves which caused the civil rights. Even though the law was passed over 200 years ago by the time of the speech, segregation still existed.
On August 28, 1963, around 250,000 individuals had listened to Martin Luther King Jr. ’s I Have a Dream speech at the Lincoln Memorial. This speech was addressed to the nation, specifically segregationists and the government, about Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream of abolishing the line between the white and black races for good. King had oftenly repeated himself in his speech many times.
In 1952, Coretta was introduced to Martin Luther King Jr. By a good friend Mary Powell. In My Life, My Love, My Legacy Coretta spoke highly about Martin from their first encounter until his death. Coretta and Martin discussed everything together, after a conversation together she stated "His honesty was the quality that touched my heart most deeply. "10
To urge the arrogant politicians to pass the women’s suffrage amendment to the Constitution, Chapman Catt not only induces fear and culpability in them, but the language she employs also establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures and emulating the politicians’ style of speech. Chapman Catt establishes herself as a credible individual by aligning with respected figures. Premising from the beginning of her address, she alludes to the cause of the American revolution, and the government’s power coming “from the consent” of the people as the two “fundamental principles” that “anchor” the liberty of the United States (39-40). This aligns her with the American ideals that founded the country. Building on that premise, she continues by
This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American
She does not find it fair that only men are given the right opportunity to vote. Shaw’s tone is persuasive when she gives the definition of a republic to prove
For example Anthony says, “but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household” This is very sad since women and girls should not be ruled or told what to do because they are thought of to be less than man. The constitution is in place to have a unified country not to have an oligarchy of men lead households. The pathos appeal is used to show what suffering women are going through due to men ruling them, and not knowing how to fight back. Susan B. Anthony in her speech also says, “Are women persons?.....and no state has the right to make a law, or to enforce an old law, that shall abridge their privileges and immunities.”, which also connects with the emotions of the audience. She is trying to make people feel bad that women are treated less even though they are just as righteous as men to have the same privileges.
I thought that “ I Have a Dream” by Dr. Martin Luther King jr. made a bigger impact or was more compelling than Susan B. Anthony’s “Woman’s Right to Suffrage”. MLK uses his powerful word choice to give a voice to the voiceless and power to the weak. MLK’s central idea is that racism is terrible and it needs to change for the better for everyone, everywhere. The first main idea is racism is ridiculous and it need to stop being put up with.
Susan B Anthony applies an allusion, pathos, and sentence structure to remind the audience that the federal constitution says “we the people” have these rights. At the time women weren’t given the same rights as men. When she talks about this Susan says, “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the union.” (Anthony,1) When Susan B Anthony alludes to the constitution it adds that feeling of ‘oh I should be doing this’ because, the constitution was our nation’s foundation. You instantly have part of you wanting to fight for the same cause as Susan B Anthony.
Martin Luther king Jr day is the federal holiday in United State on the commemoration of his achievement in his birthday. The day is celebrated as the life and legacy of a man as the holiday for his timeless value, respect, dignity and humanity that he brought to his life. It is the day to embrace the glory of humanity, compassion, faith, integration and respect to each other regardless of the race, color, origin and orientation toward some faith and believe. We are a human and humanity is the greatest verse in this earth.