ipl-logo

What Is The Case Of Roper V. Simmons Crimes

505 Words3 Pages

In Missouri of 1993, Christopher Simmons at the age of 17, along with two of his friends devised a plan to murder Shirley Crook. The night of, one of the boys opted out of the plan. Despite being down a person, Christopher Simmons and his remaining friend pursued the execution of their plan to break in and murder the woman. They restrained her in duct tape, drove to a nearby bridge, and threw her into the river below. Simmons would eventually confess to law enforcement of his actions even going as far as submitting a videotaped reenactment of the murder he committed. It was established that Christopher Simmons had indeed premeditated the murder and bragged about it after the fact. The jury’s final verdict on Mr. Simmons was guilty and the trial …show more content…

Simmons is that the Supreme Court affirmed Mr. Simmons’s appeal holding that executing juvenile offenders under the age of 18 years old does indeed violate the 8th Amendment. Additionally, along with repealing the death sentence on Christopher Simmons, the Supreme Court also repealed death sentences of many others who committed crimes as juveniles under the age of 18. Upon taking a stance whether I disagree or agree with the ruling is a tough decision, however, I agree with the life without parole sentencing. There is a certain standard of decency and morality when sentencing juvenile offenders and executing minors would be considered “cruel and unusual punishment” as prohibited by the 8th Amendment. It would be disproportionate. According to research in psychology, the brain contains areas that are responsible for reason, impulse controls, and decision making are not fully developed in minors or juveniles. There is a high percentage of juveniles in the correctional system who have experienced abuses, drug addiction, poverty, and abandonment. Juveniles who commit crimes can still have the ability to turn their lives around through rehabilitation programs. Older criminals are seemingly stuck in their ways. While I do not think that may be the case with Mr. Simmons, since he premeditated his crime and bragged about it afterwards, he should receive life without

Show More
Related

  • Breed V. Jones (1975) Waiver Case

    1262 Words  | 6 Pages

    Facts: Christopher Simmons, was a 17 year old, who plotted to commit burglary and murder. He planned with his friends, Benjamin and Tessmer, to break into a woman’s home, tie her up then throw her into the river. He planned it out. He broke into Shirley Cooks home, a lady who was involved in a car accident. While Simmons was committing the crime, he tied her up and threw her into the river.

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Case Summary

    1659 Words  | 7 Pages

    This paper will study the case study of Roper Vs. Simmons in the juvenile death penalty and critical analysis of the Supreme court ruling. The article will also address various changes that have occurred as a result of this case with future suggestions of similar circumstances for the implementation of policies and court practices. Case Background Chris Simmons was only seventeen years old when he committed murder. Simmons planned with his friends how he would murder the victim by breaking into her house, robbing and typing the person up and finally throwing her down the bridge.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Evan Miller V. Cole Cannon

    462 Words  | 2 Pages

    The punishment is just. Rights belive to be violated 8th amendment 14th amendment Rules: “567 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders.[2][3] The ruling extended beyond the Graham v. Florida (2010) case, which had ruled juvenile life without parole sentences unconstitutional for crimes excluding murder”. Analysis: Both sides are in disagreement over whether or not the sentence violates the defendant 8th amendment.

    Read More

  • Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    1385 Words  | 6 Pages

    Simmons still believed that he would not serve hard time due to his young age. He openly admitted to committing the murder and had even agreed to act out the said crime on video tape for the police. He did not know that this could be used as evidence against him later on in trial. The case eventually made its way to trial. Simmons lawyer pleaded with the jury to not agree upon the death penalty due to Simmons young age and clean criminal record.

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the friends decline to proceeded but, was later was charged with conspiracy. Charges were dropped in exchange for his testimony against Simmons. Simmons and one of his friends went into the victim’s home and kidnapped her. The suspects bound the victim’s with duct tape and electrical cord. The victim mouth was covered in duct tape as well as her eyes.

    Read More

  • Court Case Of Roper Vs Simmons

    2888 Words  | 12 Pages

    In the case Roper v. Simmons three friends Christopher Simmons 17, Charles Benjamin 15, and John Tessmer 16 decided to rob Shirley Crook 46 on September 9, 1993. As the time came, two of the three decided to go through with the robbery but John Tessmer decided that this was not for him and backed out. After that moment Christopher Simmons and Charles Benjamin went through with the crime. Then at 2 am the two boys Christopher Simmons and Charles Benjamin met up to commit the crime. They then went into the home Shirley Crook was currently residing in.

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    This case is important because the kids that commit crimes are not being killed they are just sentenced to jail for life, but you don't see on the news minors killing and robbing people. No because kids or teenagers are not going around being charged with burglary, kidnapping, stealing and murder in the first degree. The case has not been replaced by any other but it has helped some cases and it has been helped by cases. My opinion on this case is odd, teens should not be wanting to kill people and if they have they should have to pay for it they did kill an innocent person. I understand that he was a minor and because he was it was cruel and unusual to put him to death but at the same time i feel that, it isn't fair that a innocent human being died and he gets to live.

    Read More

  • Allison Simmons Death Penalty Essay

    643 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Death Penalty in Houston Texas a woman named Kayla Duncan once justice for kindhearted sister Allison Simmons who was brutally murdered with an ax in her home in Dallas Alison's husband claimed that he left his house to run a few errands and return to his home where he found his wife murdered after further investigation by the court Allison's husband Chase Simmons was found guilty for the murder of Allison Simmons Chase was a man with morals and from everyone the police talked to said they had gotten the impression that he was a good man after Kayla heard that Chase was guilty of murder of her sister Allison she took charge to try to get the court to reassess the case because she wanted Chase to be sentenced to the death penalty after the

    Read More

  • Summary Of The 57 Bus By Sonia Sotomayor

    793 Words  | 4 Pages

    On April 22, 2021, it was decided that judges now have the power to sentence youth to life imprisonment without parole. Toward the case of Brett Jones guilty of killing his grandfather at the age of 15, Jones V. Mississippi was overthrown. Succeeding the majority of Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh in a 6-3 ruling, Kavanaugh claimed that judges should be able to sentence youth to life imprisonment without parole as it should be up to the judges’ discretion. Opposing this Justice Sonia Sotomayor believes that children should have the right to parole and strongly believes judges should still have to prove teens cannot be rehabilitated to sentence one to life in prison. Corresponding to Sotomayor, youth should have the right to parole and judges should

    Read More

  • Sullivan Vs Florida Case Study

    466 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sullivan has tried several times to appeal his conviction, due to the argument that life without parole is unconstitutional. In May of 2009 the U.S Supreme Court will hear his case. During the United States Supreme Court session Sullivan argued that his sentenced was breaking the Constitution of the Eight Amendment of cruel and unusual punishment (Sullivan v. Florida, 2008). Sullivan referred to the Roper v. Simmons (2005) case thought his trial, by saying that life without parole is very similar to the death sentence and even then those offenders at least are offered parole (Sullivan v. Florida, 2008). In a desperate plea to show the difference between juvenile serving life without parole and juvenile death sentenced, Sullivan justified that juveniles who are sentenced to life in prison without parole “constitutional vice involved in punishing children with death was the impropriety of passing a final, condemnatory judgment on a still unformed human being”

    Read More

  • James Richardson's Innocence

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    Innocence is is a lack of guilt, with respect to any kind of crime, or wrongdoing. In a legal context, innocence refers to the lack of legal guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime. Being convicted of a crime and found not guilty later on can frustrate the convict and the convict’s family as the time spent behind bars, is time they will never get back. James Richardson was convicted and charged for murder and rape in Cross Lanes, West Virginia on May 18, 1989. First, Richardson noticed the neighbor’s house burning.

    Read More

  • What Is The Case Of R. V. Bann-Verdict Rationale

    1822 Words  | 8 Pages

    R. V. Bann - Verdict Rationale In the case of R. V. Bann, Bobbie Bann, the defendant, was charged with second-degree murder. Around the 14th day of June, the year 2015, in the City of Mariposa in the County of Missinaba, Mr.Bann committed second-degree murder on Fallon King, who was in the bathroom when she killed by gunshots. During the trial, it was a little confusing, the defense side was making objections almost the entire time, and it is a little difficult to follow, however, I did manage to found some evidence that indicates that Mr.Bann has murdered and caused the death of Ms. King.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Juvenile Life Without Parole

    1528 Words  | 7 Pages

    Crimes are happening around us whether we pay attention to them or not. Those crimes as dangerous as murder are committed by all ages but should younger criminal in their juvenile age received the same punishment as older criminals. On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment.(On-Demand Writing Assignment Juvenile Justice) Advocates on the concurring side believes that mandatory life in prison is wrong and should be abolish. However, the dissenting side believe that keeping the there should be a life in prison punishment for juvenile who commit heinous crime regardless of their age.

    Read More

  • Essay On Juveniles Deserve Life Sentences

    582 Words  | 3 Pages

    The article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” argues that children in prison need to be given a chance to mature and be rehabilitated (Garinger 9). Because these killers likely committed these crimes on impulse, they would often realize after the fact that they were wrong to do such an action. Therefore, when they are released, they will be more careful and think about their actions before committing. If they are given a life sentence, they will never be given this chance to fix their life. Older people who commit murders are less likely to learn from their mistakes since they put more thought into the killing than adolescents

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis

    851 Words  | 4 Pages

    The judge declares the “Murder in the first degree—premeditated homicide—is the most serious charge tried in our criminal courts. One man is dead. The life of another is at stake. If there is a reasonable doubt in your minds as to the guilt of the accused … then you must declare him not guilty. If, however, there is no reasonable doubt, then he must be found guilty.

    Read More

More about What Is The Case Of Roper V. Simmons Crimes

Open Document