Assignment 2 Illinois v. Wardlow Sam Wardlow was a 44-year-old man who was standing on the side walk in Chicago. When he saw the police cars he decided to flee the scene. Even though Sam was not doing anything suspicious (that the police could see). The police thought that it was suspicious for him to turn back around and run away. So, the cops went after him and did a frisk where they found a gun with five live bullets in it. He (Sam) was then charged with unlawful use of a weapon and unlawful use of a weapon by a felon, by the Cook County Circuit Court. Sam Wardlow then appealed his case to the Illinois Appellate Court, which then they sent it to the Illinois Supreme Court. Where both of the courts were in favor of Sam, they believed there …show more content…
Wardlow,” Sam was not engaged in an illegal conduct when the police officers saw him. What made the police officers suspicious of him was the instead of Wardlow to continue walking by the cops, he decided to turn around and walk the opposite direction. So, the police officers went after him and when they stopped him they conducted a frisk. And, they found a .38 caliber hand gun with five live bullets in the bag he was carrying. Which he was then arrested and taken to court. Sam Wardlow’s attorney filed a motion to have the gun evidence suppressed in the Cook County Circuit Court, because the officer did not have a justifiable suspicion that was sufficient to justify an investigative stop. The court denied the attorneys request to have the evidence suppressed. The judge believed that the finding of the .38 caliber gun was found during a lawful stop and frisk. The Illinois Appellate Courts First Division decided that Sam’s choice to turn around and walk/run the opposite way from the police officers in a high crime area was not suspicious. The Court ruled in Wardlow’s favor because, they believed that there was not enough evidence to support the allegations of the police that Sam Wardlow was in an area of high crime. Because, of this the police could not just stop Sam Wardlow for naturally fleeing the
The Murder of Bob Thé One morning, a person named Theo Nail came to Tiso Jock, the investigators saying that there was a murder at Jesus Christ Church. The police has already got there investigating the scene. Theo Nail asked me to investigate further and try to pick up clues or evidence. He told Tiso Jock that the person who got murdered was a guy named Bob Thé. Tiso Jock went to the scene and started investigating.
Title: Chimel v. California Date/Court: United States Supreme Court, 1969 Facts: This case deals with Ted Chimel, who they suspected robbed a local coin shop. On September 13, 1965, several officers from Santa Ana came to the home of Chimel with an arrest warrant for his expected involvement in the burglary. The officers arrived at the door and identified themselves to Chimel’s wife and asked if they could come into the home, she agreed and showed them into the house. While in the house the officers waited 10-15 minutes until Chimel came home from work.
Case: South Carolina v. Christopher Frank Pittman (Findlaw, 2008) Facts: That Pittman, shot and morality wounded both his grandparents, Joe Frank and Joy Pittman, with a .410 shotgun. Appellant was 12 years old at time of alleged incident, he was abandoned by his mother, and his relationship with his father was abusive. Prior to moving in with grandparents, appellant had been committed to an inpatient facility, where he was on the antidepressant Paxil, soon he was released and permitted to live with grandparents (Findlaw, 2008). .
On October 3, 1974, at around 10:45 pm, Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright of the Memphis Police Department were responding to a “prowler on the inside” call. They made the scene and observed a woman in the house next to the intended home of the call. She was standing on her front porch pointing at the house. She advised that she had heard glass breaking and someone was breaking into the house next door. As Wright showed both officers on the scene on his radio to dispatch, Hymon went to the rear of the house.
He originally cried self-defense. This was a part of his continued effort to obstruct justice. In fact, At the time that Slager discharged his weapon, Scott was running away when he was shot. A citizen, Santana, a witness, was walking to work when he noticed the Slager chasing Scott down the street. Santana filmed portions of the incident on his cellular phone.
On October 16th the United States Supreme Court will hear the arguments concerning the Kansas V. Cheever cirme. Scott Cheever was convicted of murder and drug useage on January 19th 2009. Cheever killed Greenwood County sheriff Matthew Samuels at the residence of the Coopers in Hilltop, Kansas. Sheriff Samuels was going to the Cooper 's residence on a tip to arrest Cheever for illegal drug use, when he arrived he witnessed Cheever and the Cooper’s cooking and ingesting meth. Cheever was shooting at several other officers when they came to try and arrest him as well as try to rescue the injured Samuels.
He said “ Officer Dave, I want you to know that I respect you. And I’m here for a good reason. I’m raising my hands up because I have two guns inside my coat. One of them is just a paint gun, but the other one is real.” When at the police station he tells the police that justice was the one responsible but they didn 't believe him because he doesn 't remember when it happened.
In the book The Pact written by Dr. Davis, Dr. Jenkins, and Dr. Hunt; George ends the book sitting at his desk observing a group of teenagers up to mischief. The teens are dressed in red and hanging around a white Honda Accord causing a commotion. He asks himself “Where are their parents? Where are the cops?... Where are our young leaders to show the kids something different from what they see around here?”
the cop asked for his ID and so he reached into his pocket and the cop was thinking that he had a gun and he shot him a few times. In my opinion shooting this man was a lot of over kill there was need for even shooting this man. I couldn't find the ruling of the case but if I remember the guy was charged with manslaughter
In today’s modern society, many feel that is okay for a police officer can kill a man armed with a harmful weapon at any cost. On many news channels, there are various amounts of articles and reports about a police officer committing this act. Even though a police officer has the right to take action against an armed man, this could be argued in many circumstances. In the 2013, Sammy Yatim was a young adult with a mental illness and was armed with a weapon on a streetcar in Toronto. Yatim was confronted by Const.
Sam Sheppard was released from prison, due to the prosecutor's believing that Sheppard was the alleged killer they set forth to instate a new Trial that would take place two years later. In 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court set aside the jury verdict, citing a climate of “inherently prejudicial publicity” and the trial judge’s failure to “control disruptive influences in the courtroom.” (Brent Larkin Cleveland Reporter) F. Lee Bailey a young new coming attorney represented Dr.Sheppard. After winning a second trial to try to prove his client's innocence he knew he had to bring new evidence to the table.
On October 28, 1976, the unfortunate murder of the officer Robert Woods was committed. The perpetrator responsible for this murder was David Ray Harris. David was 16 at the time had been previously guilty of other crimes. In October of 1976, David Ray Harris was driving a stolen car when picking up a man by the name of Randall Adams who was in desperate need of a ride. Randelle, who later returned to his home the next day stated that the young reckless 16-year-old boy was traveling with a pistol and other weapons.
He and Clark M. Neily, gathered six people to be the plaintiffs. Dick Heller a police officer that carried a hand gun all day but wasn’t allowed to have one in his home. He wanted this law to be removed. The Supreme Court overruled the local law and allowed for gun ownership and adjusted the rules for guns.
I found the suspect hiding behind a dumpster in the south east alley way. Because I had reasonable cause to believe the suspect might be armed, I directed him to exit the dumpster
Every choice you make in your life has a consequence, and each consequence affects how your life will be. Everyone has to make quick choices that will affect not only themselves but everyone around them at one point in their life. These decisions can be scary and can come at a great risk to those who chose them. On Thursday October 1, 2015, there was a shooting at Umpqua Community College.