Even though people choose to make bad choices, does not mean they need to have a death sentence. It means that they need to learn their lesson. The first thing is that they are violating the eighth amendment. It relates with a person’s rights. Also the eighth amendment said that’s an unusual punishment so they are violating the law. As a matter of fact, death penalty is socially wrong. The government thinks that it is giving revenge and reduces the value of human life. So forth, the justice system flawed is people could be wrong for who they convinced. Also the death penalty is in different states. However, people can take another person’s life then the person does not deserve to live. As well, people say that they take lives does not mean
Capital punishment commonly referred to as the death sentence or penalty is a topic of widespread controversy. The question of whether capital punishment is “cruel and unusual” provokes questions about societal values and the philosophy behind punishments. As decreed in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution it declares the use of “cruel and unusual” punishments is to be prohibited. With many execution methods such as lethal injection, electrocution, beheading, hanging, firing squads, and stoning, it sparks the question. Do these fall under the Eighth amendment?
In the beginning of 2018 there was already 2,816 people on death row and in the first 3 months 6 of those people were executed. The death penalty is the punishment of execution administered by someone of authority. It is used to punish someone that has committed a horrible crime . The punishment is the most expensive form of capital punishment that is given. The death penalty is not fair because it is unconstitutional, gender biased, and inhumane.
“The Court has consistently ruled that capital punishment itself is not a violation of the Eighth Amendment, but that some applications of the death penalty are "cruel and unusual." (Cruel & Unusual Punishment) The execution of the death sentence is subject to mistakes and flaws that may lead to the punishment being applied unfairly and in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The death penalty is an extreme and irreversible punishment placed on criminals in the United States legal system. The error and bias found within sentencing capital punishment cause it to be an unjustifiable and unethical practice that should be abolished and replaced with more life sentences without the possibility of
I believe that death penalty is considered to be a cruel and unusual punishment. In my opinion, a life is priceless and shouldn 't be taken away without their willingness. All men are created equal- no man was made better than the other and therefore should not bring death on their life. On the other hand, I think that there are more reasons why people would support the death penalty.
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.
For this is my second journal entry and we are talking about the death penalty which I think it’s very necessary to kill someone but at same time that person has a life even if his life is meaningless. Myself as American is established on the system we have here today, for the worst crimes and life without parole is better but yet for so many reasons people do bad things to good people. But then again I don’t how people operate now these days on how people can justify one person life to make a life changing decisions. For what, what’s right for our country, if that’s the case it doesn’t decrease crime, delays the suffering of families murder victims, costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and, worst of all, and risks executions of innocent people. Capital punishment is just the nice term to call death penalty is
The Death Penalty The argument for criminals to receive the death penalty, also known as Capital Punishment, has been an on-going debate for years. This issue has been very hasty in the United States because people have their own opinion on this topic. A majority of people believes that the death penalty should be passed as a law in the states, but others think that criminals should just have life in prison. If a criminal was to commit a murder(s), the person should receive the same treatment as a person they killed, death.
When people commit into crime or offenses seriously, they should be sentenced to be punished as a result of death. This is the definition of death penalty. Nowadays, there are many kinds of sanctions to punish those criminals and death penalty is definitely the most cruel and extreme one. Some people think a government should ban the existence of death penalty in a country because such penalty is a symbol of disregarding of human rights. Other people consider death penalty as a effective way to prevent revenge by those criminals and threaten other offenders in order to keep the order of society.
It says “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” But others don’t see the death penalty as going against the 8th amendment. Even though it’s the worst. Others see it as the best punishment for people who do really bad
Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).
The Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.
Death penalty is like the ‘’tooth for a tooth – eye for an eye’’ theory. Instead of acting inhuman to our fellow beings we should find a better way to solve the mind of criminals. Making the problem vanish is not a good idea. We should do psychological researching instead! I, myself have a lot of faith in humanity.
Should Death Penalty be abolished? Over decades people have been arguing about whether the death penalty should be abolished or not if death is morally right or cruel and unusual penalty. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is a government-sanctioned practice whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for crime. Is it right to see people dying even though it’s under the act of government punishment?
Black market drugs are not the only drugs to worry about, drugs used in euthanasia and assisted suicide are just as dangerous (to society). Euthanasia is the act of a medical professional terminating someone’s life. Assisted suicide is when someone provides the patient with the means for death. For example, a doctor placing a lethal dose of a drug on a bedside table and the patient ingesting it them self is assisted suicide since the patient performs the final act. If a physician were to inject the patient with a lethal drug, then it would be euthanasia since the physician is performing the final act (Marker and Hamlon).
Is it justified? The opinions on the topic vary considerably, each side with its own merits and demerits. There are some that see the death penalty as justified, as required and other that see it as a inhumane method of punishment and as something that should be abolished. But who can say for sure that either side is in the right, that either side has the correct way of thinking? To begin evaluating both sides, a few things must be done in advance.