What Is The Difference Between The Lost Letters Of Frederick Douglass And Animal Farm

The stories “The Lost Letters of Frederick Douglass” talks about abolitionist Frederick Douglas and throughout his rebellious life he published three autobiographies. He spent years writing an influential abolitionist newspaper, mastered language after freeing himself in slavery, and broke barriers for African Americans. In “Animal Farm,” by George Orwell, the book illustrates how a group of animals on Manor Farm who rebel against humans and become their own masters.” “The Lost Letters of Frederick Douglass” is about the guilt and shame Frederick had towards his family. In “Indian Father’s Plea,” it explains a disappointed father trying to get justice for his racially profiled son who is in kindergarten getting bullied because he is Native

To begin, in the stories of “Animal Farm” the book concludes on how the animals of Manor Farm turn into the owner of them by dictating each other, stealing ideas from one another, changing rules, overworking each other, and being just overall a communist farm. The author’s perspective and tone regarding intelligence explains how the pigs and Napoleon used their intelligence to trick and persuade the animals to their way of living. In the book “Animal Farm”, “The pigs did not actually work, but directed and supervised the others. With their superior knowledge it was natural that they should assume the leadership” (Orwell 12). The pigs dictate the animals and use them as slaves because they were not intelligent. An example of logos would be the pigs using logic or intelligent reasoning against

It states, "And when the personal threat was ended, whose eyes could mine enter without shame, if turning toward my wife and children meant turning my back"(Shockley). The author uses pathos to make Frederick Douglas feel guilty and regretful because he wasn't around much due to helping slaves escape, being activist, writer, spokesperson. The evidence symbolizes Douglass shame he put towards his family. In the text it cites, “…and I cannot pilfer back time / I spent pursuing Freedom. Fair to you, / to your brothers, your mother? Hardly” (Shockley). This is pathos because the line humanizes a significant historical figure, showing the reader a man grappling with his own shortcomings as a father and a husband. Using emotional feeling because Douglass confronts his own failures. In the letter it states, “But she died illiterate, when I had risked my life to master language” (Shockley). The author uses pathos to identify how he is very sad and shameful how he acted towards his family while away trying to abolish slavery. Him not being there caused his wife to never learn how to read and write even though he could have taught since he mastered them. As a result, the paragraph explains how Frederick Douglas is as a