“We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” (Immanuel Kant)
Animals, ranging from the horse fly to the mouse, are used in laboratory experiments and scientific research all over the world and are often subject to poor treatment. They are critically used for research to learn more about the human body without harming the human being itself. Although many people might argue testing on animals puts them at risk, how many human and animal lives have actually been protected as a result of animal testing? Animals should continue to be used in scientific experiments to not only lower human suffering but also animal suffering [1].
Lowering human suffering is one reason of using animals in research. New cosmetics, which can in particular carry significant risks with their use, are usually tested by
…show more content…
Critics believe that Benefit to humans does not justify the harm to animals. Scientists are labeled as cruel by animal rights supporters because they are causing animals to suffer and die in their experiments no matter if they are medical experiments or not. Millions of rats, cats, mice, and other animals are looked inside the scientific labs. They ache with loneliness and suffer in pain. All they can do is wait for the next experiment to begin [5]. Nevertheless, a higher percentage of animals are killed because of being neglected by farmers, while only a small percentage of animal deaths are caused in laboratory experiments by scientists. These animals on farms are also killed and suffer for food. The highlighted reason of why some people are focusing on the animals that are suffer and killed in scientific experiments and not on these who have been slaughtered by farmers is that they consider farmers harder to attack compared with scientists who are not. For every 1 animal killed and suffer due to a scientific experiment 99 animals are killed and suffer on farms for abuse, neglect or slaughter
Specific Purpose: By the end of my speech, the audience will know about the problem of conducting experiments on animals and the ethical issue of the cruel treatment of animals by the researchers. While the problem of conducting experiments on animals draws attention of the society, the speech would present the limitation of animal experiments and outline the alternatives. Central Idea: 1. Conducting experiments on animals has become one of crucial ethical issues of the modern society and it has even been banned in some countries.
The creation of science has helped us discover other ways to test cosmetics without the use of animals that could potentially be more efficient since animal testing is not the most accurate approach to knowing how a human body would react to a cosmetic. However, these new systems would only increase the animal population and help the environment, changing the course of our destructive path that we 're on. Therefore, to compensate, we would need to just plainly kill them in their natural habitats, where protesters can more easily block our access to the animals. This way of murder is also not as innovative as the animal testing has proven to be. Animal testing has been going on long enough to not give up on it now, we will wait until science has come up with a more innovative way to kill
The physical suffering and discomfort that animals test subjects experience during research that are frequently faulty, limited, and expensive are the factors that advocates for stronger animal rights fight to end. Each day that an animal is subjected to animal testing is another day that they suffer. The test subjects become nothing but a prisoner to the scientists and researchers. Animals in laboratories are permitted by law to be “burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain damaged” all for scientific research (“Cruelty to Animals”). As stated prior, once the experiments are over the animals either die or are thrown back into their confined cages or stocks and used for a later experiment.
However, Robert Garner and Sarah Rose A. Miller who are opponents of animal experimentation claim that it is unacceptable because it causes animals to suffer. Two aspects of the arguments about animal research are about the use of laboratory animals and the idea of using substitution for live animals, and although the authors mostly disagree
Logan Anderson Ms. DeFranca 7th Grade English Section 1 9 February, 2023 Animal Testing Argument How would you feel if you were an animal taken away from your habitat for research? You can’t even run away. Each year over 110 million animals are used for testing by humans yet, not enough help is given to them. Although some people think that animal testing is helpful for scientists to find research, we shouldn't test on animals.
Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.
Harm such as pain, hair loss, and even death is caused to animals due to animal testing. Animals that undergo these tests are often subjected to suffering due to them being deprived of food, water, and painful procedures. According to the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), animals used in experiments suffer from “pain, fear, and distress” (HSUS, 2021). Animals used in experiments are often killed at the end of the experiment. Animals undergoing research are often housed in cramped, enclosed, windowless chambers.
These experimentation usually takes place at Universities, medical schools, Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. As a result, ( introductory phrase) a study made by University of Harvard states that “more than 70,000 animals die each year due to running experiments on them.” Therefore from my point of view, animal experimentation should be reduced due to the drawback it has regarding to animal lives as it leads to the torture and suffering of animals. In addition, the final outcome of these experiments is not always
Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.
Animal Testing is Inhumane. Multiple species are dying by normal nature happenings, such as being eaten or something like that. However, that 's just the life cycle. But even with this ongoing cycle, the deaths that happen in it don 't get anywhere close to the amount of animals killed by us humans. Each year, 100 million animals, including mice, rats, dogs, frogs, cats, and more, are all killed for scientific usage.
It is true that animal testing requires a lot of investment. Not only that money is spent on advanced technologies, it is also spent to pay for scientists’ expertise on this particular field. In order for the scientists to do their research, they need suitable equipment and substances. Every year, the National institutes of Health finances between $12 billion to $14.5 billion on animal testing as indicated in a study done by the government (Bastach, 2013). Besides, scientists need to consider the fact that animals need to be sheltered, fed and cared for to keep them alive.
Opponents however, say it is inhumane and cruel to use animals for research
Animal testing is a controversial issue that is portrayed by society to be an ethically inappropriate practice, while possessing many advantages. Although people choose to turn a blind eye on its commodities and support banning it, it is extremely essential that it remains legal. Animal experimentation has benefited animals as much as humans, increased medical advancements and made several life-threatening diseases treatable. People hear the words “animal testing” and quickly think about animal cruelty. However, despite animals being the subjects of experimentation, they benefit from it just as much as humans do.
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
Behind Scientific Research are Animals’ Screams Animals are a part of our lives, undeniably and the issue of using animal in research remains controversial during the past few decades. Some supporters despite their acknowledgement of animals’ essential roles in human lives believe that it is acceptable to test on animals for scientific and commercial research whereas others state that animal testing is tantamount to abusing them and depriving their own rights. However, under no circumstances are animals used to suffer brutal human tests. Firstly, some people agree with the idea of using animals for human’s health care benefits because of certain similarities between animals and humans.