In utilizing the supernatural within the short story “Spunk,” specifically the character of Joe returning from the dead as a bobcat, Zora Neale Hurston illustrates the strong desire for equality commonly seen in literature written during the Harlem Renaissance. Firstly, it is important to note that while alive, Joe faces quite a bit of negative treatment, especially at the hands of Spunk. For example, Spunk ends up taking Joe’s wife, Lena, from him, walking around the village as “big as life an’ brassy as tacks” (Hurston 949). At this moment, Spunk is far from ashamed to be seen with another man’s wife, basically portraying Joe as incapable of being a decent husband and standing up for himself and his marriage. In addition to this, Spunk is also the one to kill Joe. Afterwards, Spunk is described as …show more content…
Bobcats, being wild animals, bring forth a sense of strength and agility, both of which Joe lacked in life. By bestowing these qualities onto Joe through the form of a bobcat, Hurston is displaying that death itself will not prevent one from attempting to achieve equality. Joe now shares the same qualities as Spunk, allowing him to be seen as equal to the man who treated him so poorly in life. Also, similar to how Spunk is described as “skeered of nothin’” (949), the bobcat also displays clear bravery, “[standing] right still an’ [looking Spunk] in the eye, an’ howling right at him” (953). Again, Joe has taken on the qualities Spunk was known for, going as far to even intimidate him. Finally, the bobcat achieves equality with Spunk by killing him. In his final words, Spunk states, “it was Joe..the dirty sneak shoved me” (954). Similar to how Spunk killed Joe with little remorse, the bobcat takes it upon itself to kill Spunk with the same lack of remorse. As Hurston utilizes this bobcat character in place of Joe, she illustrates how equality will inevitably be achieved, whether in life or in
Joe was dominant among others and controlling towards Janie. Everyone had high expectations for Joe and Janie, and Joe knew Janie did not have the knowledge or intelligence he had, so Joe looked down upon Janie. Janie had no background, the only placed Janie seemed to have belonged was under control by a man, and that man happened to be Joe. “Thank yuh fuh yo’ compliments, but mah wife don’t know nothin’ ‘bout no speech-makin’. Ah never married her for nothin’ lak dat.
This shows that Joe-Boy is mean to Vinny. Also, Joe-Boy is bossy. The text says, “‘Come on,’ Joe-Boy said, nudging Vinny from behind. ‘Hurry it up’” (Salisbury 5).
Hurston tells the story of Janie, a black woman who because of her grandmother experiences and beliefs was forced to marry into a loveless marriage with Logan Killicks, a hard-working farmer who had 60 acres of land and could provide for Janie. This marriage ended when Janie ran away with Joe Stark, a man that she fell in love with and thought could give her the love absent between her and Logan. But Janie soon realized that her second marriage wouldn’t turn out better than her first. Joe was just as controlling and degrading as Logan. He hardly expressed his love for Janie and spoke to her like an incompetent child.
When Syke begins disrespecting her by kicking her laundry with his dirty boots, she fights back , “seiz[ing] the iron skillet from the stove and [striking] a defensive pose, which act surprised him greatly, coming from her. It cowed him and he did not strike her as he usually did” (2). Her audacity defied the social standards of the time period: black women had no power over their husbands. Hurston challenges this social norm by creating a character that withstands gender roles and traditional power dynamics. By “[seizing] the iron skillet” and “[striking] a defensive pose” she proves to her abusive husband that she is not afraid of him or his threats.
In reading Joyce Carol Oates, “Hi Howya Doin”, 2007 and Zora Neale Hurston’s, “Spunk”, 1925, we have noticed similarities and differences between the two stories, which we have analyzed for further discussion. Both stories consist of life that is filled with uncertainty; good and evil are ill defined. In the story, “Hi Howya Doin”, by Joyce Carol Oates, she describes a husky male running along a path filled with a variety of different individuals from all walks of life who want only to be left alone, want no social interaction or discourse and prefer to contemplate in solitude with their miserable existence. In “Spunk”, the author paints a verbal picture of life during the early part of the 20th century, in a rural southern community, where social discourse, social contact and social interaction are extremely important for
In final words figurative language helps give ideas on how Hurston is allowing the stereotypes to not define her which leads to a brighter
He considers Janie to be daft, and always controls her even to the point of making her tie a rag on her hair. Janie “[goes] through many silent rebellions”, but chooses to keep silent in order to avoid conflict. Janie is not using her voice to empower herself, but instead she is debasing her voice’s value. Eventually, Joe’s degradation causes to Janie to finally retaliate, a pivotal point in Janie’s discovery of voice. Joe is weakened by Janie’s retaliation and his liver failure, and soon succumbs to death, but not before Janie realizes something.
After realizing that Whitey was beating Sonja, Joe remarks, “My blood pulsed and swam. The poison that was wasting in me thrilled along my nerves. I thought I’d kill Whitey. I was not afraid. ‘Whitey!’. . .
He then sets off to buy her a mule so she can work, and then she runs off with Joe. Now, Joe treats her as a trophy wife and doesn’t allow her to do
He is constantly trying to fill his love with possessions to give to janie instead of caring for her and telling her how much he really loves her. Joe also is very controlling of Janie and even begins to tell her what to wear and how she should put up her hair, “‘Whut make her keep her head tied up lak some ole ‘oman round de store?’” (Hurston 68). Joe begins to force things upon her and separate her from her friends. Joe loves power and change much more than he loves Janie and as a result he tries to control her and create her into something she is not.
”(Terry 259). Spunk was a bully that also liked being in control. Spunk and Joe took on personal missions to try and make Lena happy. Being selfish in their own right, no one was willing to give up the fight, not even
Joe seen Janie as a trophy wife or someone he could show people off to, but Janie was taken by his charms and believed that he would be the one to give her the love she was looking for. She soon realized that it was nothing like that, “And one night he had caught Walter standing behind Janie and brushing the back of his hand back and forth across the loose end of her braid ever so lightly so as to enjoy the feel of it without Janie knowing what he was doing. Joe was at the back of the store and Walter didn’t see him. He felt like rushing forth with the meat knife and chopping off the offending hand. That night he ordered Janie to tie up her hair around the store” (Chapter 5).
With that, Joe is left to find out who did this to his mother,
Hurston uses a mule, more specifically Matt Bonner’s mule, to symbolize Janie and all African American women because like African American women, mules are not held in high regard and work from the bottom, bearing the weight of many other that rely on them and their work. In Their Eyes Were Watching God, Matt Bonner’s mule is used to
Another characteristic of Nat Kinney that is shown in the story is how Jim Lane is the only man that can control Wash Gibbs and the rest of the gang. According to Tuck, Nat Kinney was seen as the regulator and organizer of the gang (8). There is a point in the novel that Wash in his crew are about to hang young matt and the shepherd, just as the real Bald Knobbers would have done (142). The Bald Knobber gang within the story has somewhat died off since the past and they are not as relevant, but Wash and his crew are still running