Ian Parker, author of “Obedience”, provides accurate depictions of the immediate and long-term effects of Dr. Stanley Milgram’s Experiment. In addition, he includes that under complex situations, individuals are easily induced to react through a destructive manner (Parker103). Americans commonly underestimate the influences of a situation; however, Parker thoroughly delineates the consequences behind blind obedience (Parker 104). Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton, authors of “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” construe the atrocity of blind obedience committed by the United States Military. In March of 1968, crimes of obedience occurred due to an elusive order commanded by a higher ranked officer (Kelman&Hamilton 131). Military …show more content…
In comparison, Lt. William Calley maintained his actions within My Lai were entirely in response to superior orders and did not endure any remorse by carrying out directed orders (Kelman& Hamilton 136-137). As to why Dawson and Downey instinctively followed an unethical command to inflict pain on Pfc. Santiago, Kelman and Hamilton convey that the structure that authority contributes to the situation effects the reactions to the explicit or implicit orders (Kelman& Hamilton 140).The Uniform Code of Military Justice, UCMJ, might refute Kelman and Hamilton by providing that military personnel must follow the lawful orders of his superior officer; in addition, it includes they have the obligation to disobey unlawful orders when in direct violation of the UCMJ ("A Duty to Disobey..."). If Dawson and Downey had the right to follow code and disobey the unlawful order of authorizing Santiago with a Code Red, then why would they follow through with the command? Ian Parker provides when there is a slight channel for disobedience, individuals tend to be more vulnerable to fascism and react in a destructive manner.
and i did not take the time to think about who i was killing in terms of age or gender”. Calley did not speak of doing “what he was commanded to do” with any errors of judgement. he only stated how he was following orders. So in other words he thinks no wrong in his actions. In Calley’s mind he believes that him and his soldiers faced constant attack after attack by guerrilla fighters , so there was no distinction between enemies and civilians.
The Vietnam War was a conflict between the Vietnamese government that was under French administration and the pro-communist Vietnamese citizens who were fighting for independence from foreign influence. The United States’ armed forces entered into the conflict in support of the colonial administration in an attempt to stop the spread of Chinese and Soviet influence and communism in the region. The Vietnam War is arguably the longest war, lasting 11 years, from 1964 to 1975, and costing the lives of more than 58,000 Americans and countless numbers of Vietnamese. U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War came about when communist North Vietnam sought to unify an anti-communist South Vietnam (Benson, Sonia, et al., 2009). As the war escalated and the
When learning about and analyzing acts of mass atrocity during World War II, hundreds if not thousands of questions can be asked trying to gain a deeper understanding for their actions. Probably one of the most intriguing thoughts to ponder is what leads individuals and societies as a whole to descend to such a level of cruelty. According to the author of Unbroken, Laura Hillenbrand, one reason may be, “Few societies treasured dignity, and feared humiliation, as did the Japanese, for whom a loss of honor could merit suicide. This is likely one of the reasons why Japanese soldiers in World War II debased their prisoners with such zeal, seeking to take from them that which was most painful and destructive to lose” (189). To elaborate, the Japanese
The Vietnam War originated from when the North of Vietnam wanted to unify the country under a communist regime after defeating the French colonial administration of Vietnam in 1954 (“Vietnam”). This decision made by the North of Vietnam was influenced by the Soviet Union as well as China. Since the Soviet Union and China were quite dominant during the Cold War, this signifies that the Domino Effect had been successful to a certain extent. Even if the Domino Effect might have been somewhat a success there were still the nationalists who did not agree to be controlled by the communists. The United States were against the Viet Cong, who were the communists, had an impact on the war (Berman).
On the morning of March 16th 1968, over 500 Vietnamese civilians, including unarmed men, women, children and elderly, were brutally slaughtered in the village of My Lai by the Us military soldiers of the Charlie Company, a unit of the Americans division 11th Infantry brigade, under the leadership of Captain Ernest Medina. The My Lai massacre was seen as one of the most brutal events to have happened in American military history and is a clear demonstration of the corruption that is within the American military. Senior officers, such as Medina, attempted to try and cover up what had occurred in My Lai but failed to do so. The massacre was later revealed after an investigation was ordered and conducted, due to Ron Ridenhour, “a former member
In 1971, Dr. Phillip Zimbardo conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment in which he recruited normal young men who were college students and drastically changed their environment in order to show what the desire for obedience can do to a person’s sense of civil responsibility. The cruel acts committed at Abu Ghraib blurred the lines between the prisoners and the guards because the prisoners were stripped away of their freedom and their human rights. The prison at Abu Ghraib was originally used by Sadaam Hussein to torture and execute political prisoners .
From the beginning of the United States military involvement in Vietnam in 1955, to its withdrawal in 1973 public support for the war was strong at first, but began to slowly erode as military actions escalated. Among the soldiers fighting in the war a critical turning point in their support for the war occurred after the revealing of the My Lai massacre. The My Lai Massacre was a turning point in the soldiers’ about the war and their support for the Vietnam War. Because of its documentation and publicity the My Lai massacre among many atrocities had such an impact, that it turned the viewpoints of the soldiers who were present at the massacre, but also those who were not.
Watching the “Rape at McDonalds” video was very disturbing. It was shocking to see how all the participants, except for the maintenance man, complied with the bizarre demands of the supposed police, especially Donna Jean Summers. As a manager, she should have known the policies of the company, as a reasonable person, she should had handled the situation in a different way. However, there are some psychological explanations for her behaviors. The law says that we must obey the authority; she believed that she was doing the right thing by following the others given by “the cop” even if the commands were very odd.
The question posed in today’s reading was whether an embedded agent should have carried out the assassination of a government official in order to further an espionage investigation. Admiral Turner pulled the plug on the investigation by not green-lighting the hit.1 While I agree with him in this case, there are more factors at play here than the mere legality of the agent’s pending act (assassination), or even the life of the government official weighed against the value of the investigation. Whether or not Admiral Turner made the “right” call comes down to a question of rational response to a moral imperative, which is where things get sticky, especially when authors start using phrases like “any means necessary” when commenting on the proposed
Hurricane Katrina was a tragedy that devastated many families, homes, and lives. Within that devastation, a tough situation arose for many public officials. Among them, police officers, were heavily affected. The question that washed among the shores of the gulf states was the moral dilemma that affected the police officers who served the community. In a situation like Hurricane Katrina, was their moral obligation to the public or their family?
The first scene that these quandaries come to light is where General Geoffrey D. Miller, a specialist in interrogations, was sent to Abu Ghraib to help guards extract more information from the prisoners. The guards at the facility had been trained for years to follow every order they had been given, but this would mark the first time that the United States Army’s orders had directly conflicted with their personal convictions. This fact was stated by the soldiers themselves in the the interviews conducted afterwards. This type of obedience can be explained by Erich Fromm in his article, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”. Fromm states that there are two types of Obedience one that is submissive to an institution or power, and another which an affirmation of your own personal beliefs (Fromm 124).
In this assignment the research study to be discussed is Milgram’s study of obedience (1963). The term of obedience can be defined as a type of community impact that incorporates carrying out an activity under orders from a dominant figure. Obedience concerns changing behaviour because a dominant figure has told you to do so. After World War II, at the Nuremberg Trials, the Nazi’s defended genocide by saying they were only pursuing procedures. In 1963, Stanley Milgram set out to investigate how far people would go in obedience to orders.
Obedience to Social Pressure The social pressure begins since the day a child we born. Our parents give us the first glimpse of the feel of social pressure without the newborn having the littlest idea of what it is. The social pressure of family unity begins when the child is born, and parents have the fear of their own family would retract and speak negatively of their own kids. Is the child ugly?
Regardless of these morally jarring responses, 65% of participants continued to 450 volts, and all participants continued to 300 volts. The results of this study suggest that ordinary people are very likely to obey orders given by authority figures, even to the extreme of killing another person, if they see such authority as legally or morally based. Although this study proved to be massively influential in terms of human behaviour, the way in which it was conducted has been criticised. One of the main criticisms is the environment of the experiment.
Martial Law is, it Curtailment or Absolute Control? Einstein once said, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” Unfortunately, it is those who we have placed our utmost trust in that are doing the evil. Whereas, those who are watching and are doing nothing, have been made incapable of doing so.