Queen Elizabeth recognized her position of power and consequently sought to maintain it. Her last speech to Parliment in 1601 was calculated and designed to convince listeners that she deserves to rule. The speech was rhetorically adequate for the situation she delivered it. Elizabeth used two main methods to appeal to the two main types of listeners, which concisely convinced her subjects to regard her as a benevolent ruler. These two main components to the rhetorical were pious humility for the educated and clerical listeners/readers and the mention of God and love for the uneducated, religious, and illiterate listeners.
Queen Elizabeth I gives a speech to her troops to prepare them for the invasion. Her motives are clear that she is pushing her soldiers to be courageous. Having to also suggest that a women can rule over thousands of men. Her purpose is to persuade them that victory will be England 's if they trust and serve under her . At the beginning of her speech she shows a positive connection to her people by saying “my loving people.” When she says “my” she is implying that that she is superior, that they are to follow under her.
On account of Queen Elizabeth’s prior knowledge that the Spanish was the favored side of the battle, she is lead to use rhetorical strategies. Upon reciting her speech, Queen Elizabeth used these strategies in order to provoke her audience’s favor. In addition, the queen ensures to utilize a persona of a common citizen so that the audience feels that she is being personal with them. This will result in a form of trust between the queen and the audience. Throughout the speech, Queen Elizabeth applies rhetoric appeals that are fitting to the audience.
She is effective here because she is using power and history in her writing to persuade her audience. She wants her audience to see how much this means to women in society and how it is a dream for women. She wants them to see it is bigger than many things and not something to ignore. She is effective also in the sense that she is referring to MLK’s speech and thus showing the importance of her words she is stating. She also uses power in her tone to almost attack the values of the members on the International Olympic Committee.
Elizabeth decided to make her speech an emotional argument, which instils a sense of nationalism. She inspires her soldier to proudly defend England by complementing them, asserting nationalism, and giving them a purpose. Throughout her speech she repeatedly makes a reference to God and country to evoke a strong sense
Painting pictures of the most intense of situations, but even then she would be with them. Igniting the spirits of her army and making it an honor to fight alongside her. Queen Elizabeth’s speech at the town of Tilbury was truly motivating. Her brilliant use of intricate diction and structure as well as appeals of Pathos and Ethos and Imagery all made for a wonderfully rallying speech. I have no doubt that she achieved her purpose, to instill in her troops, strength and
She wanted to express to her precious son to take on any opportunity that the universe threw at him for he is not the only one with admirable qualities. She urged him to carry on head strong no matter the circumstances and by providing all this support and love she sent him off with confidence and motivation to bring his mother “justice, fortitude, and every good virtue which can adorn a good citizen” (Adams). to continue making her
His intended audience for his Thayer Award speech was the West Point cadets who would one day lead our troops into battle. The purpose of the speech was to commemorate and entrust the cadets who would lead our troops. If the speech was written for a different audience, such as a more general and civilian group, it would need to have more pathos and diction directed at the common man and woman. No matter what audience the speech is written to, it contains powerful ideas and language that every audience will understand and with any audience, the message will always be the same and it will be for hundreds of
Rhetorical Analysis Malala is known for her couragous battle to fight for education for the children in her country, but to me i know her for something else. The way she conveyed her message using rhetorical strategies is how i know Malala. She makes the reader experience in his or her mind what it is to live in pakistan. Malala used very good rhetorical strategies to convey her message and to inspire many around the world, including me. To begin with, Malala used a lot of pathos to convey her message.
Florence Kelley, a 1900s reformer and advocate who worked to promote children’s rights and put an end to child labor in the United States, demonstrates appeals to logos and appeals to pathos in order to develop a passionate, powerful tone and hold the audience accountable/gain sympathy. Her organization of ideas, combined with diction that appeals to the emotions, create an influential speech that both flows logically and tugs on the heartstrings of the crowd. Initially, Kelley immediately draws her audience in, establishing the purpose of her speech and where she stands regarding the topic of child labor. She is well-organized and maintains a steady delivery of facts and statistics that help to further explain her point of view. Furthermore,