The roles of childhood is a significant theme within both Charles Dickens’s ‘Hard Times’ and William Blake’s ‘The Songs of Innocence and Experience’. Despite the fact that these texts were written nearly sixty years apart, they both portray similar messages about how children were treated within eighteenth and nineteenth century England. Dickens was highly critical of the Victorian education system, and his views are depicted explicitly within his novel ‘Hard Times’. Dickens believed that children should be taught to use their imagination and to think for themselves as well as being taught facts. Furthermore, Blake’s poems express his concerns about the way in which social institutions destroyed the capacity for imagination vision. He addresses …show more content…
During this time, Britain was changing dramatically because of the Industrial Revolution and the changes they underwent transformed the lives of its people. Dickens critiques this world in a variety of ways; through utilitarian ideals, divorce laws and the educational system. Memorising information while being deprived of any imaginative and creative activities was an important aspect of the education system within this era. The Victorian educational system dehumanised the children by treating them like mathematical figures. Moreover, this system would have been very common and would have been devised by those who had wealth and power. From the very beginning, we are presented with this terrifying education system through Gradgrind’s lines “Now, what I want is Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plan nothing else and root out everything else. You can only form the mind of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them.” When reading these lines from a Marxist perspective, the emphasis on “facts” and not fancy and the embrace of Utilitarianism becomes a justification for the abuses perpetrated as part of capitalism. Charles Dickens tends to use his novel as a crucial voice of Marxist ideologies Dickens was highly critical of the capitalist society and his novel …show more content…
The poem reports the narrator’s observations as he walks through the streets of London. We could suggest that speaker is Blake himself as he often wandered through the city to gain inspiration for his work. Written in first person, the speaker has a very negative view of the city. Blake’s use of repetition is significant within this poem as it’s purpose is to emphasise the prevalence of the horrors he describes. Furthermore, he attacks the way in which children are treated within this corrupt society. This is portrayed when Blake tells the reader that “But most thro’ midnight streets I hear, How the youthful Harlot’s curse Blasts the new-born Infant tear, And blights with plagues the Marriage hearse.” Children are born into a world where young women have become “harlots”, and their tears are cursed instead of soothed. The poem links the exploitation and vulnerability of innocence with adolescent prostitution and child labour. As a result, Blake presents a world where childhood is lost by
Wealthy elites or the bourgeoisie continued to earn high profits while the poor proletarians continued to take part in labor intensive work in factories. Marx and Smiles both saw this as a major problem in their society. In Marx’s Communist Manifesto, he wrote, “ not only are they [the proletarians] slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois state; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself…” What Marx means is that the bourgeoisie is looking down at the proletariats and using them as merely a way to earn profit. In contrast to Marx, Smiles said, “...they [the proletarians] resemble the savage tribes, who know no better, and do no worse.”
In response to the Industrial Revolution of Victorian England during the 18th century, British society found itself at a crossroad regarding what was deemed significant in human life. The Victorian life was grimy, tough and cruel, and it is made prevalent throughout Charles Dickens’ novella, ‘A Christmas Carol’, that a clear distinction is illustrated between that of the wealthy, aristocrats of England, which was paralleled with those who don’t have wealth, but may have happiness. Dickens integrates the use of satire with the intention to evoke change within his audience, which would result in a more equal England in the future. Moreover, the use of multiple literary techniques as well as the further development of characters, of whom reflect stereotypical members of Victorian England society, Dickens is able to exemplify the need for humanity to transform for the good of all. Dickens establishes greed as a major flaw in society, furthermore, Dickens exposes the greater requirement for generosity to be prevalent within humanity.
In the nineteenth century, Dickens was writing a forgettable epic works. "Dickens beliefs and attitudes were typical of the age in which he lived” (Slater 301). The circumstances and financial difficulties caused Dickens’s father to be imprisoned briefly for debt. Dickens himself was put to work for a few months at a shoe-blacking warehouse. Memories of this painful period in his life were to influence much of his later writing, which is characterized by empathy, oppressed, and a keen examination of class distinctions.
In the book, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee portrays the story through the eyes of a young girl named Scout. This novel takes place in the 1930’s during the Great Depression in the small town of Maycomb, Alabama. Scout and her brother Jem are growing up, enduring the hardships of the Tom Robinson trial and uncovering the mysteries of Boo Radley. Harper Lee incorporates the themes of love and innocence into the book, expressing it through the use of character interaction. First and foremost, two characters that greatly display the theme of love and innocence are Scout and Dill.
The main thing we see in these poems is income inequality. These children are “poor” (Blake 127). The narrator in the poem in “Songs of Experience” calls England a “...land of poverty!” (Blake 127). But, earlier, he calls England a “...rich and fruitful land…”
Literature provides a fascinating lens through which the human experience can be explored and examined. Texts of various mediums can captivate the hearts and minds of audiences with the unique perspective they provide on life and human society. The transition from childhood to adulthood, spurring from a loss of innocence, is an interesting and challenging aspect of a uniquely human experience. Especially relevant for young people, the ways in which literature explores the events leading to the maturing of a person, and reflects the adversity and hardship during this time is a rewarding and captivating area to investigate. The creators of texts, explore differing forms of adversity and hardship which inevitably result in a loss of innocence.
Children had suffered greatly; if they did not do, what they were asked to the resolution was to whip them in special “whipped rooms.” Children today do not appreciate the little parts of their childhood. Complaining of going to school or doing a simple chore, today world just they spend their free time in electronic device or too busy trying to grow up. Children during the industrial revolution lost their childhood by working all day for long
The poem strongly stresses the idea of unconditional love. This bonded and unchanging love is the most common amongst children and their parents, and is clearly accentuated in this poem. While the first stanza describes the birth of the child, set in the past; the second stanza is a jump from that stage to a point where the child has now become a teenager. We can tell this by contrasting the first line ‘’I can remember you, child’’ with ‘’Still I am fighting/ You off, as you stand there.’’
This heightens the impacts of the more vivid descriptions that follow, when Dickens describes the children as “wretched, abject, frightful, hideous, miserable.” The juxtaposition of these terms to the traditional view of children as vulnerable creates a sense of shock in the reader. Furthermore, the use of asyndetic listing alongside the negative adjectives creates a semantic field of horror. In this way, the description of Ignorance and Want as children is used by Dickens to increase the atmosphere of pessimism.
This assonance begins the poem by setting the scene. We are able to interpret that the unnamed narrator is in a terrible mood, is fearful, and his anxiety is skyrocketing. This is set at midnight, which gives a feeling of uneasiness. These dark terms are emphasized by the assonance to give the
Other poems such as “Mutability” by Shelley expressed how it was perfectly okay for humans to see change and how thoughts were always never going to be the same. But “London” by William Blake showed the anger and sadness of people through a high monarch. In both poems, nature and emotion was the element greatly used and it expressed the power of how things around humans can dramatically change their perspectives and their thoughts or eventually have the outmost effect on
Children today have simple lives, while during the Industrial Revolution, it was a little more complex. Children during the Industrial Revolution worked long hours in appalling conditions for little pay. Furthermore, “A picture was painted of the ‘dark satanic mill’ where children as
The average life a person lives in this time period comes easy. Though we may have certain struggles, they don’t compare to the daily problems of lower class throughout the Victorian Era. Of course, there were many successful people during this time, poverty became a huge issue for the common family. Shortage issues influenced adults as well as the children. All ages got the enjoyment of life stolen from them in this rigid era.
The authors remark how the bourgeoisie aren't capable of controlling their own power (19, 20). No longer is production to satisfy property conditions' development (20), rather there is unquenchable lust for possession. Marx and Engels aim to right this by abolishing existing bourgeoisie property (27). This is fantastic to the proletariats, for it strips the bourgeoisie of their independence from the working class (29). To the proletariats this is the symbol of equality with a group that has placed itself above the workers, due to its possessions, and strips them of power to subjugate another to labor by appropriation (30).
Marx and Engels look at capitalism with seriously negative opinions. They regard the system as extremely unsuitable, and are deeply concerned with getting rid of it. In a capitalist society, capitalists own and control the main resources of production - machinery, factories, mines, capital, etc. The modern working classes, or proletariats, own only their labor. Proletariats work for the capitalists, who own the product that was produced and then sell it for a profit.