In the Great Gatsby, the author tells us a story about a man whose name was Gatsby, when he final became rich by his own effort, his lover can not accept him at all, people around him were just made use of his money, and they still looked down upon him because of his poor background. What a sad story! Through this story, we can learn that money is not so useful, maybe we can use money to buy a lot of things, but it does not mean rich can present everything. Gatsby’s
The Outsiders Final 5 Paragraph Essay In S. E. Hinton’s The Outsiders, two different gangs, the Greasers and the Socs detested each other. Using Ponyboy Curtis, the author demonstrates a Greaser’s opinion of the Socs. Ponyboy had an evolving conception of the Socs. At the beginning, he disliked the Socs because they are rich and he thinks they have no problems.Because of some discussions he had with a few of the Socs, he changes his opinion Recognizing that the Socs are just people after all, Pony’s final opinion is that they have problems too. Pony’s opening opinion of the Socs does not show them in good light.
In the novel, the main conflict was caused by the Greasers and the Socs, them and the Greasers disdain one another. This was mostly dependant on how different they were relating to their social and economic classes. The Socs were rich and had a luxurious life whereas the Greasers were poor and recognized as troublemakers. Ponyboy expresses that “[he’s] not sure how you spell it, but Socs is the abbreviation for Socials, the West-side rich kids. It’s like the term Greaser that’s used to class all us boys on the East Side.” The author uses characterization to make the reader comprehends that the Greasers and Socs are separated due to social and economic rankings.
Tom was a careless human being. Tom married Daisy and later in the book cheats on her without an afterthought of the outcome. This class believed they were above the rest and saw it no other way. They had very high educations and most if not all went to Ivy League schools. Tom inherited a ton of money so he did not work.
Even if one of the characters in The Great Gatsby was supposedly attracted to someone, it was for their status in society rather than their personality, attitude, and moral values. Because of this, many characters do not experience the feeling of love in their lives. Fitzgerald illustrates this absence of love through the shallow philosophies of the upper-class and wealthy characters in the novel. He displays this through the characters of Jay Gatsby, Tom Buchanan, and Daisy Buchanan. Jay Gatsby does not have the feeling the of love in his life, even though he is desperate to be with Daisy.
The inequality of the class caused the inequality of view. In fact, people are all equal and should not have different views on others because of the amount of money. His family was poor when he was a child. Although he was smart enough to go to university, he received different material and education from that of high-class people, which directly led to his inferiority. From this, we can find that the psychological pressure lead by inequality is very unforgettable.
The caste differentiation was very obvious. According to the website of The Qing Dynasty, it mentioned that “the social structure at Qing Dynasty was the emperor were the top, then were Generals, nobles, and workers, and Artists and Peasants and the last were Slaves and Servitude.” people were divided by their social status, and people were very indifferent at that time. In the story, it mentioned that the boss was grim-faced man, and the customers were not pleasant either. Because of the caste differentiation of the feudalism, the social atmosphere was very gloomy. People only cared about their own profits.
Although you had never met this man, you judged him based on what he looked like. You thought of him as less of a human, gave a look of disgust, and simply walked by. Society creates a bar of expectation of what is acceptable and what is not and if you are below that bar you will be forced to be ostracized from society. Society shapes how a person’s success, beauty, or financial stability can affect them. For example, compare a rich man to a
By getting addicted to it, people can end up losing work, prestige, value, family members, and all the necessary things needed for a good life. Other than that, becoming an addict to something is a very bad thing anyway, regardless of how good or bad it is. People who became addicted to lottery has given up on many things which they could have done if they weren’t addicted. For example, my friend spends so much money on lotteries, which he could have spent on many other things to make his life a little better. When you are playing lottery, you are actually being lazy and inactive.
Although, a contrast is sometimes not created due to the separation pulling two forces apart, and because of this, our perceptions of the world may not change. This is evident in Pawel’s image where the homeless and the rich obviously have nothing in common and are clearly separated. We see this from the lighting of the poster, the rich man is in bright light whereas the poor are in darkness. The darkness symbolises that their lives are much harder and darker than the rich man’s bright and exciting life due to wealth. Distinctively visual features effectively show us the separation between the two classes and help the readers understand that the rich and the poor will never have a relationship due to the structure in