Bradley Allgire
Arch 365 Statecraft
Professor Miglio
1 March, 2023
The Eloquent Peasant The ancient Egyptian story The Eloquent Peasant concerns the titular peasant, a man named Khunanup. This story originated in the Middle Kingdom, but appears to be set earlier, during the First Intermediate Period. The text seems to direct criticism towards and call out injustices within the legal system which would have been in place at the time. The story begins with a peasant, Khunanup, packing up goods on his donkeys, so that he might trade them for supplies elsewhere in Egypt. A list of what he had packed is provided, and includes items such as reeds, natron and salt, various unknown plants and stones, and animal skins. He leaves from a town called
…show more content…
In these speeches, he criticizes the justice system which allowed him to be put into this situation. One of the statements he makes in his second petition to that effect is that “The judges are an insatiable belly”. The meaning of this is that they readily accept bribes which will alter the outcome of a case. This accusation may be applied on several levels. First, it is saying that the justice system itself is corrupt. Furthermore, it suggests an implicit bias against those of a lower class, who would not be able to afford to give such a bribe. Not only this, but the very next line states that “the speaking of falsehood is like (fine) herbs for them”. This implies that not only will the judges be dishonest in their rulings if offered a sufficient sum, but the very act of lying is enjoyable to …show more content…
However, the pharaoh of the story, Nebkaure the justified, king of Upper and Lower Egypt, has instructed him to not assist or even respond to the peasant, and instead to only record his petitions so that they may be read to him as entertainment. This indicates that the king, having been notified of the peasant’s skill in speechcraft, wants to hear more from him before he returns home, which he would surely do if his appeal was heard and granted right away.
Throughout all of the peasant’s petitions are inserted lines where he posits how this system should be run, in contrast to what often actually happens. Khunanup says the judges should be like a beacon for the population, a paragon of virtue and an example to live by. In this way, the peasant’s speeches often come across as an entreaty for the officials to improve their actions in this regard. A prime example of this is in his sixth petition:
You are educated, you are intelligent, you are proficient— but certainly not in order to steal— but look at yourself! You make yourself just like everyone else! Your deeds are perverse, and the example for all men is now the deceiver of the entire land. He who tends the garden of evil waters his field with corruption, and cultivates his plot / with falsehood, so as to irrigate iniquity
In “The Palace Thief,” by Ethan Cain, Cain conducted a thesis of morals versus pragmatic. By having his main character as the narrator, Cain introduces a character called Hundert, a history teacher who claims he wanted to teach good virtues to his pupils so that they could become great leaders. However, this was then challenged by one student, Sedgewick Bell. The relationship between Hundert and Sedgewick challenged Hundert’s convictions and principles. Cain develops a central idea that morals and virtues are irrelevant to gaining power.
Also, how would they get a job to provide for their family without hands? Another example is paragraph 4 of document B. It states, “ … If the rulers do not esteem my words, … If he destroys the law then I have given you, … may the great gods of heaven and earth … inflict a curse … upon his family, his land, his warriors, and his troops.” This is basically saying that if the upcoming king does not agree with some of the laws, that he can’t change them, even if he thinks it’s unfair to his subjects. The next King should be able to tweak the laws a little if he disagrees. Some people may claim that that Kings’ can do whatever they want but, Kings’ should do what is best for the citizens, and punishing them harder than necessary is not going to benefit their kingdom.
By dismantling the clergymen’s claim, King proves the innocence and integrity of his actions. In another attempt at criticizing him, the clergymen claim that King must advocate for protesters to adhere to and comply with all laws, regardless of their opinions, because he constantly demands for peaceful protest. However, he refutes this statement by alluding to St. Augustine’s belief “that ‘an unjust law is no law at all’” (King 4). St. Augustine’s comment on the legitimacy of a law signifies that if a law is immoral or degrades the human character, then the law is deemed invalid and should never have been instituted in the first place.
King comes to the conclusion that, when laws are unjust it is the duty of all citizens to stand up against them, cause tension, and try to evoke
Apart from the means by which King believe negotiation should be achieved, he also understood who was trying to be negotiated with and why it was made to be so difficult. King analyzes that “privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily” and that a majority force is very useful in abolishing what would be considered these undeserved privileges of the time. For example on the type of individuals who dodge the issues and do not wish to give up their privileges, in the letter
A prominent point was when he expressed that “We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed”. A law addressing an injustice sometimes does not become justified until it is overdue. Another notable statement from the text is “An unjust law is no law at all”. King questions our corrupt system where breaking some laws is advocated while others require conformity. The statements cited from this document are authentic points for issues of the present and the past.
In his poem “Incident in a Rose Garden,” Justice brings to light the idea that higher social status causes greater arrogance in one through the author’s diction. After encountering Death, the gardener runs to his master, proclaiming, “Sir, I’m quitting my job/ I want
This displays the King's character,in being unwilling to let the people opinion and assemble against his ruling. He inhibited
Moreover, King pulls together some very important points in his letter. He refutes all the points made by the clergymen, stating that waiting for the courts to handle everything has never worked in the past. In his words, “this ‘wait’ has almost always meant ‘never’. We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that ‘justice too long delayed is justice denied’”(p. 264). In his eloquent and composed writing, he not only manages to address their criticisms and answer with indisputable facts and stunning rhetoric, but also helps elevate his cause.
In the poem Ozymandias and the novel, The Scarlet Pimpernel, the authors tell stories of two men whose thirst for victory and rule turn them into unforgiving leaders. As with every ancient egyptian king, Ozymandias wanted a vast empire that would conquer the world and intimidate anyone who dares to challenge their authority. The once mighty statue, now a pile of
He deals with the facts of the situation in a way his critics fail to and details the local political situation and the ramifications of the recent elections. The letter explains in detail why non-violent disobedience is the ideal way to proceed and refutes each element of the argument put forward by clergymen, one by one. For example, one of the criticisms from the clergymen was that King was breaking the law. King's argument against that was that just laws should be followed, while unjust laws should be openly and deliberately disobeyed. He then goes on in detail to explain what makes a law just or unjust.
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely”-John Dalberg Acton. For Judge Crevan, his power corrupts him wholly because of his greed, grief, and wanted to stop people from negatively affecting society. In the real world, people have tried to control others through propaganda, education, and threats for those in power to conceive their plans for a “better world”. Cecilia Ahern explores the idea that unbridled power leads to corruption through her main antagonists in Flawed.
This can be seen as the narrator using his writing to voice his opinion to the audience by referring to individuals as useless. The second point addresses the economic state of the country and how selling “the beggars” (Swift) will allow for the economy to grow. This can be seen as a persuasion technique as Swift discusses how they is “millions of creatures, who would be debt of two million pounds sterling if begging was a profession” (Swift). This convinces the audience to perceive the country’s people as beggars who don’t work for what they need, pushing Swift’s idealistic views onto them. Swift also elaborates on his point further through discussing the politicians who may oppose him and how they may “first ask parents of these mortals (referring to the adults as if they were still children) whether they would not at this day think it as great happiness to have been sold for food at a year old” (Swift).
In the third page of his letter King, expresses his understanding on his and his companies willingness to break laws. It is explained that only the “unjust” laws are to be broken and, "An unjust law is no law at all." By relating to, and showing his understanding of the concerns of his opposers, King makes his letter
Ancient Egypt SLL 1057F Amber Waynik WYNAMB001 Tutorial group 2 Jessica Nitschke 1.Hymn to the Nile i) The phenomenon that the “Hymn to the Nile “responds to the dependency of the Egyptian people on the Nile river. The text shows that the Nile river served as a source of life which sustained and provided all for Egyptians “who creates all that is good” (“Hymn to the Nile” stanza 9). The text asks questions about who controls the Nile and why it flow the way it does - the text itself answers that it is the Egyptian god Hapy who controls the Nile.