Keshaun Spruill
2/4/2016
MLA Format
Professor Jones
Western Civilization I
What Made Rome Great
Rome was made great and a strong civilization through the characteristics of its culture. Rome has a variety of views in their government and the way the culture changed. Aside from the political arrangement of Rome’s government there existed an extensive patronage relationship that gave benefits to both parties. Virtues were also an important aspect of Roman culture that many sought to keep alive. Citizenship for Roman citizens made it more beneficial to those with the capability to obtain it. The qualities that made Rome great was found in how its people were valued and the government’s ability to take different forms of government and create
…show more content…
Roman citizenship actually opened a lot of opportunities for citizens of lands conquered by the Romans. “They could now hold office, they could serve in the legions (Roman military units), and more” (Hist 101 Section 11). The perks of being a Roman citizen, native to Rome or not, gives one the opportunity to serve in the government or military. Roman citizenship does not remove the citizenship of one’s original country, the individual has the protection under the Roman Empire while retaining their own. “Additionally, all of the masses of subjects under this government have protection against the more powerful of their native countrymen” (Aelius Aristides). The Roman Empire extended its protection to all citizens in any of its provinces in the case of officials attempting to break the law. “Thus, the present government serves rich and poor alike, and your constitution has developed a single, harmonious, all-embracing union” (Aelius Aristides). What makes Rome great is its care for all peoples under the law, as long as one obeys the laws of Rome. The Roman citizenship perks are not excluded due to religion either. Jews and Christians were extended the same rights under the law as any other citizen. This happened to serve as an asset to the apostle Paul when he was arrested by the Romans. Acts 25:11 shows Paul utilizing one of his basic rights as a citizen, …show more content…
Mixing three different forms of government into one working one that gives benefits to both the nobles and the commoners without one power overtaking the other. Rome also utilized the patronage system for mutual benefits to both the patron and client. The people of Rome also sought to hold onto virtues such as loyalty and bravery to loved ones and the empire. Bravery was shown with the ideal that military service would toughen young males. One of the greater characteristics that made Rome great was the perks of citizenship. References
Aristides, Aelius, Excerpt from The Blessing of the Pax Romana. HIST 101 Western Civilization I, "Week 4: The Romans." Virginia Beach: SoftChalk LessonBuilder, 2013. Horace, Excerpt from The Odes. HIST 101 Western Civilization I, "Week 4: The Romans." Virginia Beach: SoftChalk LessonBuilder, 2013.
Holy Bible: New International Version. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2005. Print.
No Author, HIST 101 Western Civilization I, “Week 4: The Romans.” Virginia Beach: SoftChalk LessonBuilder, 2013.
Tacitus, Excerpt from The Histories. HIST 101 Western Civilization I, "Week 4: The Romans." Virginia Beach: SoftChalk LessonBuilder,
The values of the Roman republic, included rule of law, upright moral behavior, the rights of citizens, and a political system that offers some protection to the lower class. The Rome army also helped the city become a success because it was drawn from the growing population of Italy and was renowned for being well trained, well fed, and well rewarded. This showed the people around the city that the Roman republic cared for everyone and was very straight forward about what they expected in their city. 6. How & why did the making of the Chinese empire differ from that of the Roman Empire?
Roman citizens had come to consideration that they, indeed, did have a poor government. The Roman government gave an unjust life to people based on their social rank (Document E). This led to the citizens not appreciating the government as well as the Empire. Most of the emperors in Rome were assassinated so it gives the citizens the intention that if you did not like the emperor you can just kill them (Document A).This tells the reader that it was hard to govern Rome because they constantly kept replacing emperors. Considering that Rome did not have a stable ruling system, citizens of Rome began to doubt and not depend on their government.
Camille Sicat #26 3/16/16 Writing/Social Studies Power of the People: Athens vs. Rome Essential Question: Citizenship in Athens and Rome: Which Was the Better System? Prior to the idea of people being “citizens” of a nation, people were subjects, with no rights and forced to serve under the iron fist of their ruler. The idea of people having rights and responsibilities to their country originated in Athens, Greece circa 500 B.C. (Background Essay). Rome, however, far surpassed the Greeks in their social contract theory of citizenship (Background Essay) for the following reasons: 1) More people were considered citizens i.e. females and sons of freed slaves; 2)
The Romans emerged from Italy and formed their culture that can find its roots among an array of native tribes and Greek colonies that populated Italy. There are two parts of the foundation of a Roman’s identity that stemmed from the cultural influences that produced the Romans, their culture and their ideals. The first component of the foundation of the Roman identity is the usage and the incorporation of others’ myths into their own etiological myth. The second part stems from these myths that made the Romans believe that their existence and success was the result of fate. By looking into Virgil’s Aeneid and Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline one can see that this two-part foundation produced a society and people that embodied this idea that they were the best parts of all the cultures
In Source A, Citizenship in the Roman Republic by USHistory.org, the text clearly states: “All males over the age of 15 who were descended from the original tribes of Rome became citizens.” This text proves the Roman laws of citizenship were not only non-democratic, but also ageist, sexist, racist, xenophobic, and bigoted. The law states that if you don't meet all the criteria for citizenship, you can't possibly be a citizen. In essence, this meant that you had no rights at all or little rights at all. This citizenship law does not ensure that all citizens have any rights or authority, which is a crucial element of what democratic citizenship entails.
Morals and values were one of the most important factors that kept Rome prosperous, and without it, the empire itself would have crumbled. However, as years passed, Rome’s citizens began to lose their honorable edge. This caused the streets of large, influential cities to become dangerous and infested with crime. Additionally, because the emperors began to get lazy, much of the money used for defending Rome was wasted on lavish parties and coliseum bets. Because of this, many soldiers left the army, seeing as they were not getting paid anymore.
Document C gives examples of how the Romans' citizenship was granted in these "measured amounts". One example was how the Foederati, or people of states with treaty obligations with Rome, were given limited rights for serving in the military. 4a. Unlike in Athens, citizens' rights would not have reduced the level of organization during political events. 4b.
Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Being a citizen means not only meeting certain responsibilities, but also enjoying certain rights. In the U.S. today, many of our governmental institutions are based on concepts of the Ancient World. Citizenship in the United States resembles the concepts of citizenship in both Ancient Athens and Ancient Rome. Ancient Athens believed that participating in government and making the city-state work was a part of being a good citizen.
Romans were also not beasts for not participating in government unlike the Athenians who punished them. In document D it also states that they were “ ranked into distinct classes” which shows that they were put together and had their priorities straight. In document F it states “ senate had full governing power in Rome” which is better than in Athens where everyone kinda ruled, Rome was more of a democracy. This evidence all helps to show that Rome was better when it came to citizenship because they were more thought out and not all
Ancient Rome is recognized for strength in war and battles, so the ideal citizen would be strong and willing to fight. Hunt explains that in Rome “one man’s loss was another man’s gain” (177). The culture of Ancient Rome was aggressive, as the men were trained to fight and be devoted to their country. “Male elites had to be on guard to defend against and avenge any slights to their personal, family, and state honor” (Hunt 177). In The Aeneid, Virgil writes “Roman, remember by your strength to rule //
In his Germania, Tacitus describes the lands and peoples of Germany. He sometimes praises them, sometimes derides them, but often he writes with an air of casual indifference. Since Tacitus was a Roman, and he wrote the Germania for other Romans, the reader can get a glimpse of Roman society at the time through analysis of Tacitus’s word choice and tone. While Tacitus covers many facets of Germanic culture, he particularly highlights their customs in battle and rather ethical domestic lifestyle, while disparaging their seemingly inherent lazy nature and tendency to fall into drunkenness. In this, the reader learns what values the Romans of the day - or at least Tacitus himself - held in high esteem.
Rome Impact On Today's U.S. There are many reasons on why Rome or Greece is better than the other in the categories of math, technology and even the military, But that's not the point I’m trying to get across I'm writing about how much of an impact these countries have made in modern day, here are my reasons why Rome has overcome that aspect. I think that the country of Rome has made a bigger impact on the U.S. today because of their military, leaders and also their technology was also more advanced than other countries. There are many reasons why Rome has made more of an impact on the US today ,the first reason would be because of their more advanced military, how well their leaders led their army and military during that time of war , that
There are several theories historians believe on what may have been behind the fall of Rome. One of the theories is due to its decline in morals and values and how its citizens carried themselves. The other two theories that were discussed were the environmental and public health issues and Rome’s political corruption in choosing the new emperor to rule. The importance of theorizing why Rome did not last as an empire is to try to figure out why the empire was destroyed and how its stability threatened the United
Introduction The Roman Republic was a good empire for a long period of time. They said they would never be ruled by someone again, SPQR. After a while, they got ruled again by emperors, but did they ever meet the common good? The Roman Republic somewhat meet the common good due to providing public services, preparing for a common defense, promote rule of law and protecting rights.
”This quote highlights the arrogance and warlike nature the Romans developed, and the paradigm shift that the Roman Empire endured culminating from “Pax