ipl-logo

What Procedural Steps Must The Orange County Prosecutor Take To Extradite Hurst From Arizona

579 Words3 Pages

In this paper in criminal procedure, I will discuss a scenario in regards to extradition. Throughout this paper, I will address and answer the following questions: 1.) What procedural steps must the Orange County prosecutor take to extradite Hurst from Arizona? 2.) What procedural steps must the Orange County prosecutor take to extradite Brook from Mexico? 3.) Solana files a writ of habeas corpus in the proper Arizona Court. How should the court rule? Why? Before a criminal extradition process can begin, there are important steps that must be followed before the person is finally extradited. The Supreme Court has identified four issues which a state court may analyze when determining whether or not to extradite: 1. Whether the extradition request documents are in order; 2. Whether the person has been charged with a crime in the requesting state; 3. Whether the person named in the extradition request is the person charged with the crime; and 4. Whether the petitioner is, in fact, a fugitive from the requesting state …show more content…

After this, they will need to receive a confirmation by the Court in Arizona to determine if the paperwork is in order. The next thing is that the court in the receiving state will confirm whether Hurst has been charged with any crimes. In most cases, by this point there would have been a warrant issued, and the warrant confirmation should say whether there is “full extradition” or “in-state pickup only”. Once everything is in order, the agency responding to pick-up Hurst will have up to 30 days to do

Show More
Related

  • Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

    1235 Words  | 5 Pages

    In a retributive justice system, the state is tasked with bringing Blanco-Garcia to justice. The state will accuse Blanco-Garcia of murdering Vanessa Pham and hold an adversarial trial to determine whether he is guilty of the crime or not. An appointed defense attorney (DA) will represent Blanco-Garcia at trial. Due process demands that the defendant is afforded legal representation to argue matters of law on his behalf as well as to protect the defendant’s other due process rights. Likewise, the state will also be represented by a legal agent, the commonwealth attorney (CA).

    Read More

  • Case Study: Strickland V. Washington

    1778 Words  | 8 Pages

    The respondent then sought collateral relief in the state court on numerous grounds, specifically among them was his assertion that counsel had rendered ineffective assistance at the sentencing proceeding. The respondent challenged his counsel’s assistance in six respects. He claimed that counsel was ineffective because he failed to move for a continuance to prepare for sentencing, failed to request a psychiatric report, failed to investigate and present character witnesses, failed to seek a pre-sentence investigation report, failed to present meaningful arguments to the sentencing judge, and failed to investigate the medical examiner’s reports or cross-examine the medical experts. The respondent then filed a habeas corpus petition in Federal District Court seeking relief on numerous grounds, including the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The District Court denied relief and found that the counsel made judgment errors in failing to further investigate mitigating evidence, but the respondent 's sentence did not result from any prejudice from any of the counsel’s judgment errors.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of KECIP

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    KECIP ( Kidnapping Exigent Circumstances Interrogation Provision) is a legislation proposed by President Donald Trump. He is committed to signing the law into a legislation if it is passed by the Congress and the fate of this law rests in the Senate. Some provisions about KECIP are when there is a federal arrest where the suspect is held in the custody while being charged with kidnapping them in 24 hours the district attorney has a right to have a court hearing, no information which is disclosed by the attorney during the 72-hour period can be used during the trial and the court during the time of a hearing can decide where he presents evidence that 1) the location of where the person is kidnapped is unknown to the law enforcement officers

    Read More

  • Habrzyk Case Analysis

    1142 Words  | 5 Pages

    Gomez filed a petition for the return of the children on the legal issue that the twins Oscar and Emme have become settled in their new environment. The petition of Jenifer Gomez to bring back the Oscar and Emme to Brazil under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Hague Convention”), and implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 42 U.S.C § 11601 et seq. (“IC-ARA). Habrzyk v. Habrzyk.

    Read More

  • Brady V. Maryland Argumentative Essay

    390 Words  | 2 Pages

    The duty of any criminal prosecutor is to seek justice. A conviction is the end of justice being served prior to sentencing; however justice cannot be served if an innocent person is found guilty. Even though the prosecutor(s) are there to represent the public and has the duty to aggressively pursue offenders for violations of state and federal laws, they shall never lose sight or their own moral compass of their main purpose is to find the truth. In the pursuit of truth, the United States Supreme Court has developed or made rulings in reference to several principles of conduct which have to be followed by all prosecutors to assure that the accused person(s) are allowed the proper procedures and due process of the law granted by the 14th Amendment.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Due Process In The American Criminal Justice System

    492 Words  | 2 Pages

    Due process is the fair treatment of the judicial system by the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This is the constitutional guarantee that one will be given the opportunity to be heard before they are deprived of their life and (discharge from all restraints or obligations unless convicted). (Schmalleger 631-632) And also guaranteed that the law will not be unfair in anyway and that the government will not in any way deprive any person(s) of their constitutional rights.

    Read More

  • Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    890 Words  | 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizona On March 2, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested from his home in Phoenix, Arizona in regards to a rape and kidnapping. After a two hour interrogation, the police had finally gained a confession from Ernesto.

    Read More

  • Film Review: Indiana Jones And The Temple Of Doom

    954 Words  | 4 Pages

    Himanshu Deswal BALLB 16 20161373 History Assignment THUGGEE, CRIMINAL TRIBES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURES In 1986, East India Company Introduced a THUGEE ACT but western countries have many misconceptions about the Thuggee one of the major example of misconception is the 1984 Hollywood movie Indiana Jones and the temple of Doom. Movie is set in the year 1935, after 100 years starting of Thuggee Act, the area near Pathankot city in state of Punjab of colonial India The film has also been the subject of controversy due to its portrayal of India and Hinduism. The depiction of Hindus caused controversy in India, and brought it to the attention of the country 's censors, who placed a temporary ban on it.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Asylum

    1314 Words  | 6 Pages

    An asylum is offered by one State to an individual looking for shelter from another State. On account of political shelter, the exile is inside of the region of the State where the offense was conferred. A decision to grant diplomatic asylum involves derogation from the sovereignty of that State. It pulls back the wrongdoer from the locale of the regional State and constitutes mediation in matters which are solely inside of the fitness of that State [Peru]. Such derogation from territorial sovereignty cannot be recognised unless its legal basis is established in each particular case.

    Read More

  • Ethics In The Criminal Justice System

    1279 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place

    Read More

  • Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Pre-Trail Release

    891 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper is to help show how sometimes judges can be Bias or inherent in the amount of bail set and other restrictions for pre-trial release while showing the concept of bail what can be done to prevent arbitrary and potentially prejudiced decisions from being made in the courtroom when it comes to bail by the judge, Also discuss the pros and cons of private vs. public defense. Introduction This paper will show the pros and cons of pre-release and define pre-trail release and bond, arbitrary. bond types also look into the factors of bail amounts a judge looks at to determine how much the defendant’s bail is and a few ways to prevent arbitrary and potentially Prejudice decisions from being made in the court by judges.

    Read More

  • Stamp Act Informative Speech

    410 Words  | 2 Pages

    Today, my dad is going to a meeting of the Stamp Act Congress to discuss how they going to deal with this new tax. They passed a tax on anything made of paper in March of this year and we only have until November to stop the Stamp Act from completely going into effect. (americanclass.org) Let's see.. it's April now... So, we only have five months to stop it from being fully enacted. My family has been split on their feelings about the Stamp Act.

    Read More

  • Irrestee Conviction

    684 Words  | 3 Pages

    Question 3(b) This question deals with the procedure after the arrest of an arrestee; specifically the 48 hour detention time constraint of an arrestee. Section 35(1)(d) of the Constitution guarantees that arrested persons, suspected of committing a crime, are entitled appear in a court as soon as reasonably plausible. This court appearance must occur within 48 hours of the arrest. The court appearance may ensue at the conclusion of the first court day subsequent to the termination of the 48 hour time frame, if the prescribed time constraint lapses beyond ordinary court hours or on a day which does not qualify as an ordinary court day.

    Read More

  • Extradition Condition In America

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to the West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, extradition is the transfer of an accused from one state or country to another state or country that seeks to place the accused on trial (legal dictionary). The country or state whom wants the person accused for a crime must provide documentation on the explaining why they want him or her in their custody (Zabyelina). Reason can range from murder, illegal goods being sold, and other serious offences. Within the documentation, the state or country must make sure they aren’t trying to charge him just because of color of skin, nationality, or religious believes. In addition, they must be given a fair trial with unbiased court.

    Read More

  • The Pinochet Case Study

    1342 Words  | 6 Pages

    1. Introduction and case overview. The Pinochet case was a media sensation in the end of the 1990s, well known by the general public as well as by jurists and vigorously celebrated by human rights advocates. It is claimed to have been an example of the successful use of universal jurisdiction and a twist in the understanding of immunity granted to state officials.

    Read More

More about What Procedural Steps Must The Orange County Prosecutor Take To Extradite Hurst From Arizona

Open Document