In the video “Farmland,” there were six farmers that took their own roles in each of their farms. They each had interesting chores and responsibilities for their farming business. The video showed the importance of living on a farm and knowing what it is like because most Americans have never been on a farm or a ranch or even know what takes place with farming occupations. The public perceptions created from this are many times incorrect, causing many wrong assumptions in the public. As we watched the video, we noticed a variety of occupations for each of the farmers throughout the agriculture business. Many new technologies were also presented. In my opinion, Ryan Veldhuizen, Margaret Schlass, and David Loberg were three of the most interesting farmers in “Farmland.”
First, Ryan Veldhuizen is a fourth-generation farmer that is taking over the family operation. The focus for Ryan’s operation is the grow pigs and crops to feed the animals. Dealing with public perception, he also dealt with diseased crops. That being said he had to spray chemicals on the plants to help treat them. The public has an issue with chemicals being put on crops because they feel it will harm the animals or humans eating them, an incorrect belief
…show more content…
The focus for her operation is to raise vegetables for markets and people in her community. Some struggles that she had were old equipment, harvesting enough food for all the people, and tending to her crops every single day. She performed everything by herself, meaning she fixed the equipment, harvested the food by herself, and made sure all the crops had enough water and were growing correctly. I thought it was extremely cool that she accomplished growing such a variety of crops all by herself. Also that she was part of the Community Supported Agriculture membership program. Many people supported her which helped her first-generation farm become so
Now that may make him sound naive about plants of the area but the catch is that there was a little amount of poisonous amino acids in the seeds, something his guidebook didn’t mention. His death wasn’t the result of being unknowledged, it was simply a misfortunate mistake that anyone, besides probably a highly trained botanist, could’ve made since it was a kind of poison that had only affected a few cases of starving
Again, I think this is a great opportunity for students to see first-hand the process of farming or growing a produce, the work it takes to package it and get it sent out to the manufactures who are selling the product. If a student has the aspiration or goal to become a farmer, this experience is one that introduce them to the work and type of environment in which they will be.
In many ways, Farm City is a political book that touches areas that the city population didn’t know existed. When we imagine a farm we think large vast area with perfect sunny weather and huge sum of produce. What we learn from this book is that we can be a farmer with just planting a pot of vegetation by the windowsill or keeping a pet rabbit with intent to kill it and consume it. I spontaneously went to the flee market one Sunday and came across some rabbits. I currently am raising a bunny in my apartment that I adore and although I might not kill it myself, I heard rabbit’s meat is delicious.
Poking fun at the lack of intelligence of farmers,
In Blake Hurst’s “The Omnivore’s Delusion: Against the Agri-Intellectuals,” he opposes the accusations made by tofu-eating, recycled-toilet-paper-using, self-starving Michael Pollan and his followers. Throughout “The Omnivore’s Delusion…,” Hurst mentions how methods of farming have evolved to match demands of produce. The author states that “Only ‘Industrial farming’ can possibly meet the demands of an increasing population and increased demand for food as a result of growing incomes” (Hurst 4). This quote essentially means that “Industrial Farming” is the most efficient way to farm for today’s population level. A second point that is made by Hurst is that changes made by today’s farming are necessary.
She had to be escorted to and from school to avoid people harassing her. This didn’t just affect her, it affected her whole family. Her father lost his well paying job, and her mother Lucille couldn’t go to the grocery store in peace. As her family suffered, many other people were empathetic for them. Sending them food, and other goods to keep their spirits up.
Bluemoon Acres has posted an image on their website of a pair of hands each full of rural and urban soil. While scrolling through Google, this picture has the ability to catch the eyes of those who are involved in programs such as the National FFA Organization and 4-H, most members can recognize the difference between the two types of soil. Not only is the focal point eye catching the color scheme could be considered vibrant and contrasting which may create interest in the image. The appealing colors and relatable subject constructs an attention-getting ethos and pathos argument. However, the lack of statistics and other numbers show a lack of a logos argument within this image.
He bring up how people do not realize the consequences of farming
Farmers in the West, both before and as the Depression hit, frivolously worked to farm their land and produce as much agriculture as possible, aiming to fulfil their duty as a “proper” American citizen in fulfilling their role as a hard and productive worker. The ideas of hard work ultimately led to over-working the American farmland in the western United States. As the overworked land was uprooted, displacing these farmers, the ideas of a strenuous American work ethic continued to remain in the minds of these
Another technique the author uses is to put you in the farmer’s shoes so that the audience can empathize with the farmer. “Three thousand hours a year is a staggering amount of time to spend working, particularly if many of those hours involve being bent over in the hot sun, planting and weeding in a rice paddy ”(Gladwell, 2008, p. 235-6). Here the audience both feels bad for the farmer and feels the enormity of the amount of work that a rice paddy farmer has to go through which allows the audience to both empathize with the farmer as well as sympathize. Other techniques that Gladwell uses to appeal to the reader’s emotions are the use of a description of rice farming so that the reader can understand the complexity of rice farming, the use of powerful proverbs to invoke the reader, and the use of a joke to include the
Intro BP 2a. Audience -tone (Text evidence+text evidence) 2b. Purpose-repetition 2c. Context-organization 3.
She was a working nurse for wounded soldiers and work without payment mostly. In her interview in document D, Tubman mentions that she worked in order to help, not to receive any payment. The way she made her living was by simply creating different good and treats to sell around the military camps. By living this generous way, she was able to help her community all while supporting herself during the war. Her second achievement that is well-known is opening her house to those who were in need of shelter.
For many people the ideal meal is inexpensive, fast, and tastes good. When purchasing these quick and inexpensive meals we put very little thought into how that food was actually produced. Food Inc is a documentary produced by filmmaker Robert Kenner and Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation, to bring awareness to Americans about the industrial side of food production. Kenner wants us to question how much we really know about the food we have been feeding to our families and to ourselves. He interviews various experts such as food advocates, farmers and authors who have written books about the food industry.
Human civilization evolved over a period of time. People’s life, behaviour and adoption have been changed from gathering and hunting to urbanization stage. In the beginning, people were depending on gathering and hunting then they reached the stage of cultivation of crops and this way agriculture began. At that time people did agriculture from bare hands, later on, plough developed. At that time, agriculture production is low because of lack of agricultural knowledge and technological inputs were also low which bind the whole family to work in agriculture fields.
This provides humour while portraying the farmers as dull and unpleasant enabling the audience to relate to the