What Was The Difference Between Political Reconstruction And Congressional Reconstruction

The time period after the Civil War was a very interesting time. Just because the Civil War was over does not mean that all of the hard feelings would go away. Families had been separated during the war and many of them still believed in what they had been fighting for. The Union had to figure out a way to get the North and South to work as a team, yet many politicians had different views as to how this should be done. Another issue that began to rise was between the President and Congress. Each branch was demanding more power over the other, and of course this caused problems. Some even find this tough-of-war between power odd because at the time both the President and Congress were the same party, so it would only be natural that they would get along better than if they were opposing parties. Nonetheless, when it came to the reformation of the Union there were two different views, the Presidential Reconstruction and the Congressional Reconstruction. When it came to the Presidential Reconstructions they believed that the states should still be governed as any of the Northern states were. However, the Congressional Reconstructions refused to take back their claim that the South had rebelled from the North; therefore, they should ruled

Both the Presidential Reconstruction and Congressional Reconstruction agreed that the abolition of slaves and giving Africans the right to vote was absolutely essential for the Union. However, they both disagreed on how quickly this should be applied to the government. President Abraham thought that this should be a slow process. Many people thought that this was strange and went against everything that he had originally fought for. Yet, Lincoln was using the idea that if you slowly allowed Africans to vote and become citizens then there would be less violence. The Congress on the other hand wanted to end slavery and allow them the vote right