United States is one of many countries that isn’t under a tyranny, but do you know how it remains like that? On the year of 1787 the people who wrote what now is the Constitution met in philadelphia to write a new Constitution because the Articles of Confederation were not successful. How does the Constitution guard against tyranny? The Constitution protects against tyranny because the principles of Federalism, Separation of Powers, and Check and Balances all divide powers. The first method the Constitution protects against tyranny is Federalism.
Edwards and Wattenberg define Federalism as, “a way of organizing a nation so that two or more levels of government share formal authority over the same area and people. (Edwards and Wattenburg,70)” When the United States first started to form a central government their objective was to never allow for a dominating power to take over the country again. To do so they created a division of power and made it possible for states and more so the “people” the right to have more of an impact on government. Or so were their intended thoughts when creating the constitution and the branches. In doing so their focus constrained national government but left a loose string as to what the states and their constitutions could do.
Who were the founders and what methods did they use? What were their successes and/or failures? Women’s Suffrage Movement gave women the right to vote in elections during the late 19th century. Women organizations nationally and even globally formed efforts to gain voting and equal civil rights for women. Women's Suffrage Movement has taught many students about the importance of gender equality and how women deserve the same rights and benefits that a man is given.
The Iroquois tribe had something called the Great Law of Peace. This included a constitution very much like ours. alson this show our leaders that they wanted to be more civilized. Also it sets up democracy in the united states These ideas are seen in the Constitution when it says, “No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.” (John hancock)this shows us that they wanted to make decisions as a group and they all wanted to be informed The founding fathers believed it was important to include these ideas because it would benefit their country and it would make them more different from britain Many events and documents inspired the American US Constitution. These ideas are still believed
By splitting up the types of power the government and states hold, the citizens’ rights are afforded, as noted by James Madison, “double security” from tyranny by either the states or the government. All other political power remains with the states as a result of the 10th Amendment which also states that the federal government may only exercise the powers as defined within the Constitution. Unless the people want the federal government to execute a power, then the government can not take such individual actions like they have with the Net-neutrality rules. As Madison wrote in Federalist #45 of the Federalist Papers “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.” This statement of Madison’s serves as a reference that helps to further justify the state of Washington’s actions to pass a law to retain the original Net-neutrality rules that the government had no authority to change in the first place.
They were scared of tyranny, especially pertaining to the fact that under the new Constitution, the national government, or Congress, would be able to make decisions without even asking for the states’ permission. (Anti-Federalist 1: Brutus). Even though the Constitution called for checks and balances, Anti-Federalist Patrick Henry, was convinced that the president would be the one making all the decisions, not unlike a king. (Bianco and Canon, 44). The national supremacy clause in the Constitution even stated that national law supersedes any state law when there is conflict.
Without racial superiority in social status with politic and economy, tones of whites were willing to return to past life. Hence, when Ku Klux Klan (1872), an organization terrorized African Americans and supported desegregation appears, many whites agree even participate. Not only the poor whites and mobs, even high social status whites, like polices, lawyers and firemen join in “KKK”. In conclusion, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments conform to the liberty and equal spirit in the U.S. Constitution, which according to empower backs liberty with civil right and voting right. Even thought the Amendments’ limitation cannot avoid, they have landmark influence to the U.S. civil right and political rights.
Finally there was the 15th amendment which was ratified on February 3, 1870 and granted African-American men the right to vote. (“Primary Documents in American History." 15th Amendment…). These amendments attempted to alleviate some of the maltreatment black people faced in this country. Yet many of the rights that these
The government of the United States (U.S.) has a largely balanced position between the federal and state governments. Through the U.S. Constitution and multiple years, the states and the central government are required to have an equal amount of power. Both the states and central government have certain powers and responsibilities that control and affect the other version. Within the central government, it was created to serve, protect, and provide services for the state and people of the U.S. Limited within the articles of the Constitution and implied powers, there are certain rights it gives to the states. Within protecting the rights of the people, the national government must provide a “republican form of government,” without being specific to its promises.
Executive Orders are orders that are legally executed by the president. “Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies. However, in many instances they have been used to guide agencies in directions contrary to congressional intent.” Those executed laws have full power when they take authority from the legislative branch. There is not much of a difference between executive orders and law. Executive orders have to be obeyed unless they are overturned by capable authority.