They can feel all of the pain being caused to them, and humans don’t know that pain because we don’t have to go through it, we don’t have to feel it. Or see it. If the consumers saw what was happening to these poor animals, they would think twice about buying the products that test on animals. There are many people standing up and fighting against animal testing, people whom all of us look up to. Paul McCartney is one of those people, and he stands up and fights for these poor animals being used to test chemicals.
Animal experimentation is cruel and inhumane, and it can be replaced with other methods. Finally, animals make bad test subjects because they are very different from animals and humans. Animal experimentation has caused a lot of uproar, but in the end, people can hope more animals will have happy families to go home to, like the “Chicago
Once said by Ricky Gervais, “Warning: Wearing make-up that was tested by torturing a beautiful, innocent creature makes the world an uglier place.” Cosmetic animal testing has been around for close to 80 years due to safety regulations that were implied by government. If these were really safety regulations, wouldn’t someone think that it is not safe to test on animals? Animals are animals whereas humans are humans. Using rats, dogs, or rabbits as testing subjects for mascara, perfume, shampoo, etc. is not humane at all.
They are tortured during animal testing. Animals might receive the necessities. The only way to know if the product works is to test on another human being. Outlawing animal testing will cause people to die. Life saving drugs weren 't never able to reach the market.
For decades humans have tested on helpless animals with cosmetics, medicines and other medical supplies such as bandages, cleaning products, candy, and even office supplies. Animal experimentation is a cruel and inhumane act upon creatures who are believed to be fearless and painless. But, on the contrary, others believe that animal testing has become a groundbreaking way of research for numerous diseases. Although many have mixed feelings about animal testing, it is something that we must address and take seriously, realizing that it is a horrible act upon innocent animals. According to the Humane Society International, animals are commonly subjected to force-feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, and many other pain-inducing and life-threatening situations during such experiments.
People all over the world say it's the closest thing were ever going to get to an actual human being. There is a heated debate on whether animal testing should be avoided in the U.S. Should the animals be able to go threw alarming experiences that can cost them their life forever, or should the innocent animals
Persuasive Speech Essay The ASPCA is well known for their heart wrenching commercials against animal abuse. People like them know that animals are not politically secured, and that the injustice they have must come to a stop. In order for this to happen, the laws must change, the consequences for animal cruelty should be raised, and people have to understand the result animal abuse has on humans as well. There are about one million animals that are a victim of cruelty. This should be considered a violent crime, which is when the victim of the crime is either threatened or harmed by violence.
The most egregious unethical practice towards animals would be Animal Testing! I believe this is the worst because it is completely unnecessary. Medical testing is preformed on animals because the are most closely related to humans. However if these animals are really like us, how can we in good conscience allow them to suffer. Science has already proved that animals think, experience emotion, and feel pain.
Animal testing is wrong and needs to stop. These animals are dying from neglect and harsh conditions. Animal testing is not even one hundred percent accurate! People have talked about what it 's like to be a test subject. So again, why is animal testing still allowed ?
However, even with the supposed “protections” afforded by the AWA and PHS policy, millions of animals continue to suffer and die in unnecessary, inadequately monitored, and counterproductive research. In the end, the minimal protections offered by the AWA and PHS policy provide no real safety or relief to the millions of animals in labs and offer only a false sense of security to the caring public. All it takes is for people to know the facts about animal testing and what truly goes on behind closed doors. If more people understood how it affects the lives of animals, maybe, just maybe their could be a change in the way people think about animal