He wanted people to despise the government the way he did. McVeigh didn't care what people thought of him, because he showed his true character when he blew up that building with all those people in it. When he did get caught, he was sentenced to death by lethal injection. McVeigh's close association with white supremacists and other government-haters at
As mentioned above, Willy reflects Biffs’ failure in business as a reflection of his own dreams of succeeding although he only succeeded for a short while in his life. Also, the affair that Willy was in might have affected Biff and made him unable to keep a job. Willy has such insecurities with betrayal and himself that not only does he believe his family betrays him but also people on the outside too. His boss, for example, just because his boss fired him, Willy takes it as a form of betrayal even though he tells him, “there’s no room for betrayal in the business
The government in the book had been brainwashing their citizens into believing books were bad for society and were constantly distracting them. Beatty had also tried to protect Montag, by warning him that he only had one day to burn the book. Proving that Beatty is justified in telling Guy Montag to burn his house down Starting off, Beatty was doing his job when telling Montag to burn his house down and if he were to let Montag go then Beatty would have had to suffer the consequences. Montag
Jake tried to get out of it, but Alonzo threatens his life and his family. He gave Jake no choice to be the good guy that he is. To Alonzo it’s his way or the highway. The whole scene shows how evil and corrupt Alonzo and his Narcotics team really is. Alonzo plans everything and makes sure that everything goes his way, or he will fix it by pulling the trigger.
As an important figure he is put in that place to keep everything calm and peaceful. The prince is the most to blame for the terrible deaths. First - he played a big part in the story in the sense that he made the laws for the town. Even know the Prince did not speak to much in the actual play he was one of the main factors in the end. He claimed that if any more fights broke out the people would be killed.
Greyson was completely caught off guard with the accusation. But he composes himself and tells them part of the truth. He tells them that he had heard some agents that were talking about how it was a shame that they had to ignore it and couldn’t warn Scythe Curie. Then the Chancellor says that he thought he could be a hero. So then they expelled Greyson permanently.
The justice looks like the major issue of the plot, as Abner’s actions are explained by himself and his family as a response to an insult. But it is clear the man’s logic is twisted; Abner Snopes provoked all incidents by himself to create a reason to excuse his desire for fires. The final scenes of the story suggest the justice was served, as the man was caught during his final crime. But this is also a complex situation, as other family members, who did not support Abner’s position directly, did not experience the improvement in their living conditions and even could be hurt or killed. The story starts with the description of a trial, where Abner Snopes was accused in burning of his neighbor’s barn.
King and Milk had the guts to stand up for their beliefs and people did not like that, two men didn’t like it so much, they killed these influential, important leaders. I believe Harvey Milk and Martin Luther King Jr. were brave and crucial leaders to their time. They made important changes and awakened the the people who were so enclosed in their opinions. Whether they liked it or not, they were exposed to leadership that they were going to be seeing and enduring for the rest of their lives. Even if Milk and King were
The conspirators thought that the plebeians would understand their motives, but, instead,“the city was in shock, and people became increasingly more hostile” after the assassination (Wasson). The commoners sided with Anthony and Octavian, ignoring the lack of justifications that the conspirators and Brutus provided. They were angry that their beloved king had been assassinated by the senators who were supposed to be working and supporting him. The author of The Assassination of Julius Caesar. A People’s History of Ancient Rome and political scientist, Michael Parenti, stated that Caesar’s assassination “marked a turning point in the history of Rome.
It took some convincing but he finally agreed and said they would validate for one another. A week later when it was payday the man whose idea it was to falsify their timesheet reported to the boss that a fellow employee had lied on his timesheet. After a small investigation they found out he was not present during the hours he claimed to work and was fired. This situation is very similar to Cassio and Iago because the man wanted to the promotion and was successfully able to manipulate his opponent. From this experience, you should learn to stick to your extinct and not let others convince you to do something you know is wrong.
From what this case turns out to be, as determined by the facts surrounding it, if our organization was set up such that our supervisors have the power to fire employees under their supervision, the company could have potentially found its entangled in a Sarbanes-Oxley lawsuit. There is no doubt that had this morally upright secretary been fired for standing her ground in the face of our rogue supervisor 's demand for her to cook the books the company could have been in violation not only for attempting to file a fraudulent expense account but for taking retaliatory action against her for refusing to do such. On the other hand had the secretary connived with her boss, the supervisor and prepared the false expense report, the company 's reputation could have again been in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. A federal law that prohibits publicly traded companies such as ours, in engaging in fraudulence accounting and financial practices. Such a scenario could have ruined the corporation 's reputation and expose it to an enormous fine from the Federal Trade Commission.
Lawson was a communist and had been since 1934, but he refused to answer any of the questions that HUAC had asked. He said, “You are using old technique, which was used in Hitler Germany in order to create a scare here--” (L 57-58). While this is showing HUAC was trying to create a scare to the people, he was proving a point that their scare wasn 't scaring Lawson. HUAC was a very powerful committee who accused many Hollywood producers of being communist. These accusations caused loss in Hollywood business because Americans began to be fearful that Hollywood was communist and they didn 't want to give any of their money to people who were not of what they believed.
Let’s get down to business. The person who crashed into you obviously didn 't want to get caught so they decided to run off before the cops came. We 're thinking that the person did it on purpose because you were finding too much information out about them. I would not have been the drug lord because he makes all his followers do all his dirty work for him.” My boss