The video introduces the idea of “in between people. These in between people were of European Decent and could be transformed into Americans by Americanizing them into the White American. They would be apart of a term known as the “melting pot”. A melting of all European Descent to mold them into Americans. Italians, Germans and other European could be apart of the American way of life by being taught the language and customs. This melting pot exclude black people, chinese, puerto ricans, and other people of color. They could never fit or be apart of the pot. Race in some cases in this time of Americanizing is fluid only if you can fit in the white American life style. The races with fairer skin are more fluid and can pass for white American. …show more content…
For example, Black and chinese are race that American considered not apart of Americanization. They are considered static and undesirable races that got no freedom compared to the European immigrants who got more acceptance. This shows us that raced can change, but only by what the Americans thought could be changed and what races were fixed. In this case, Europeans could be changed,but not colored people. The melting pot helps us understand that there was a lot of white supremacy at the time and America really only valued the white American and no one else. It also shows us all the other races that go left behind during this time. It was still a time where freedom wasn’t given to everyone. The people of color can’t go into the pot and become Americanized but they could help the flame the pot and help it burn. In other worlds, people of color were more people who could work for low wages and do grunt work. Like for example, When American workers went on strike colored people were given jobs so employers didn’t have to pay minimum wage to their
David Brook's essay focuses in the main part about the discussions and conversations on race, which is aimed to lead the readers to contemplate the assumptions we take for granted such as the critical question of is diversity a cared for subject in the United States?” Intro :- The occasion that gives rise to David Brook's essay “People Like Us”, is diversity in America. In his essay , David plainly and purposely confronts his audience – which are most likely Americans- with the reality of diversity in The United States .
Explaining Ethnorace Thesis: With existing schematization presenting a range of issues in society, Alcoff’s theory of ethnorace provides effective ways to resolve the issues present within it. Fanon and Young on Schematization: Fanon and Young’s texts provide excellent accounts that allow schematization to be understood from different perspectives. In The Lived Experience of the Black, Fanon recounts and compares his experience around other “black” people (like himself), and around “white” people. These experiences, according to Fanon, brought about the experience of skin color.
The term “melting pot” has been used since the early 1900s, and it means a place where people, ideas, theories, cultures, etc. are mixed together. Although this may seem like a harmless thing, the idea that one must give up part of their culture to obtain parts of a new one undermines the importance of cultures in one’s life. In chapter 14 “The Melting Pot” of The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, Anne Fadiman shows the challenges and hardships that Hmong immigrants faced when immigrating to America to show the power that an environment has on a person’s connection to their culture, and the impact that people have on the culture of the society they are entering Fadamin provides examples of the action of Americans towards to Hmong people
While A Quilt of a Country concerns the diversity of America after the tragedy of September 11, 2001, The Immigrant Contribution revolves around the idea that immigrants are American history and isn’t specifically about the diversity of America. A few quotes may explain some confusions:”When photographs of the faces of all those who died in the World Trade Center destruction are assembled in one place, it will be possible to trace in the skin color, the shape of the eyes and the noses, the texture of the hair, a map of the world”(Quindlen 16). This quote is about how when the World Trade Center came crashing down, viewers can recognize how diverse America is just by examining the photos of those who died; to put it in plain English, they can trace features from every part of the world in those photos. “Oscar Handlin has said, ‘Once I thought to write a history of the immigrants in America. Then I discovered that the immigrants were American history.
This was supposed to mark the end of slavery and the beginning of freedom for black people. In no way did this mean equality or even equity between black and white people would exist. The inequity between black and white people didn’t suddenly come to an abrupt ending. White people still had superiority over black people and the law was still in their favor. Not to mention, people were still extremely prejudice.
The “discovery” by the United States that Europe had inferior and superior races was a result of the large amount of immigration from southern and eastern Europe in the late nineteenth century (Brodkin, 1994). Before this wave of immigration took place, European immigrants had been accepted into the white population. However, the European immigrants who came to the United States to work after 1880 were too numerous and too concentrated to scatter and blend in. Rather, they built working-class ethnic communities in the United States’ urban areas. Because of this, urban American began to take on a noticeably immigrant feel (Brodkin,
Pratt explains that this intersectionality of cultures produces ideas and perspectives about people of different cultures. In developing a broad course on cultures, Pratt engrossed students of various backgrounds and experiences such as a would soccer team produce. In the United States, there are numerous subcultures that fill the melting pot known as America. The dominant culture is that of white, middle-class, Protestant people of northern European descent. The subdominant cultures of the U.S. include Asian Americans, Jews, African Americans, Latinos, and among others, are seen as facing a choice to oppose, be opposed to assimilation or otherwise react to the dominant culture.
I also chosen the Caucasian-American approach that allow the most to teach self-reliance. One of the most important evidence of this, I see that these children can more easily adapt themselves to the new environment and has more experience to express themself. For me also, the article was very informative in terms of many aspects of the different approaches on feeding routines within each culture. It is great example of the fact that the approaches of learning and ways to achieve them may differ, but every parent wants the best for their
“That tension between “the melting pot and the salad bowl” a recently popular metaphor used to describe New York’s diversity” (Sotomayor 74-78). She was using the melting pot, and the salad bowl to make listeners or readers think about how the metaphors relate to diversity in New York. The metaphors explain the diversity quite well. The salad bowl refers to how many different cultures can be integrated into one society like veggies in a salad. And the melting pot which means mostly the same thing where in a society many different types of people blend together as one.
Equality: The Rebirth of America In Patrick Buchanan’s essay “Deconstructing America” he mentions in regards of the creation of America, “But that republic and that empire did not rise because the settlers and those who followed believed in diversity, equality, and democracy, but because they rejected diversity, equality, and democracy. (Buchanan 597) Mr. Patrick Buchanan clarifies what the founding fathers of this nation were based, shaped, and modeled by rejecting any close contact with today’s melting pot model, which it led to an era of chaos when this sense of thoughts were implemented. Even though the melting pot model shows how cultural pluralism might create cultural separatism due to America losing its fundamental traditions and
Often times people put the founding fathers on a pedestal,but Hamilton portrays them in a relatable, humanistic light. The fact that the cast consists of people of color furthers the audience connection to the story because America today is racially diverse; audiences wouldn’t be able to connect to the story as well if the actors were all white because that is not the America that the audiences are familiar with. People of color can now view themselves as a part of American history through Hamilton’s diverse casting. In history class, many people of color cannot personally relate to the information taught because a majority of American history was written from a white perspective. Hamilton allows people of color to feel like they are an
The United Kingdom and the United States of America are two of the most influential nations in the world. Both nations are known for their unique systems of government, which differ significantly in terms of their structure and functionality. When comparing the sovereignty of the political systems in the United Kingdom and the United States of America, one must keep in mind that it boils down to the power to not only successfully govern a society, but to maintain that power without challenge. In this essay I will compare the ways both systems interact with their different forms of legislation, and where sovereignty can be found within the United Kingdom, or the lacktherof in the United States. Firstly,^ Arend Lijphart used the UK and the
We see how the leaders of this country, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, had prejudice thoughts about these two different ethnic groups, how prejudice was built into society and the
Can you image living in America and be told you can not love or be with an individual base on there skin color? For over centuries, America was consider the land of freedom and opportunities and also know as an melting pot, due to the mixtures of ethnic cultures in America. This place that is name the place of freedom and land of opportunities is the same place where people were and continue to be discriminated against and have laws based around race. “The American melting pot? Miscegenation laws in the united states” is one of the most interesting article that I have readied.
Asians were concurrent members of the nonwhite/other population, regardless of sometimes being classified as white. This led to being a bridge between White and Blacks, but also caused Asians not to be considered as belonging in American