ipl-logo

Who Is Alexander The Great

479 Words2 Pages

There are three main components of greatness. Being humble, having integrity, and caring for others. There are many figures throughout history that have displayed these such as George Washington, Rosa Parks, and Gandhi. Alexander the great was not great because although he conquered a lot of land he was very greedy and conceited. Alexander could not recognize when others attempted to help him. One time Alexander was standing on the deck of a boat when a big gust of wind came and blew his hat into the water. A sailor jump in, retrieved it, and returned it to him. Next the document states, “Just then Alexander remembered a prophecy he had been told, and his expression became very serious. The prophecy said that ‘anyone else who wears the king’s crown is a threat.’ And so he ordered the sailor’s head to be cut off at once.” By saying “anyone else who wears the king’s crown is a threat,” the document reveals that Alexander doesn 't care that the sailor was trying to help. If anyone is a threat to him, Alexander is willing to kill them so they don 't take his spot as King. This shows that Alexander is greedy because he wants to be powerful and have control over everyone. Also, Alexander did not value …show more content…

In addition, Alexander thought he was the best and did not like when he was considered equal. According to The Letter from Alexander to Darius the document states, “‘In the future,’ Alexander wrote,‘any letter you write to me should be addressed to The King of All Asia. Do not write me as an equal!’” By saying “Do not write me as an equal” the document explains that Alexander thinks he is the better and more powerful than everyone else, even another, former king. This shows Alexander is conceited because in Alexander 's mind everything is all about him. Also he wouldn 't even let Darius’s family free because he didn 't write to Alexander as “The King of All Asia. Alexander thinks he is the best because he defeated the Persian Empire and had one of the biggest

Show More
Related

  • To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    By this I mean that his empire only held together for ten years after his death (Doc E). A great conqueror would want his empire to go down in history as the best, but Alexander did not even tell the people who would rule after he died. His grand empire took up a great chunk of his life to build and not caring what happened after his death shows that he was not concerned about what happened to others after his death. In the background essay, it says that, “For reasons that are unclear, he [Alexander] had not named an heir. After much fighting, Alexander’s generals split up the land.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    818 Words  | 4 Pages

    “The second part of Alexander’s plan-to inspire loyalty among his followers and the people he had conquered. ”(How Alexander Used Religion) In the same document it said, “The second part of Alexander’s plan-to inspire loyalty among his followers and the people he had conquered.” This quote tells us that Alexander was planning to inspire his followers.

    Read More

  • Harriet Tubman Pawn

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    He had very high standards at a very young age and surpassed those standards instantaneously (“Alexander the Great Biography”). One can infer that many looked up to Alexander and respected him. God believes that everyone is created equal; no matter if one is a slave, or a pawn, or a king, they are all equal in the eyes of God. However, when the time came, both of these people died.

    Read More

  • DBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?

    781 Words  | 4 Pages

    (Doc. B). This empire had not messed with him or affected him conquering land, but Alexander saw an opportunity and jumped at it first chance he saw. Alexander did not think about the negative affect that was created by him conquering all this land, he just saw the opportunity to become more powerful, and make his empire one of the biggest. He wanted to set a legacy for himself, and did not care about how everyone else was

    Read More

  • Parallel Lives Plutarch Analysis

    1783 Words  | 8 Pages

    Instead of letting the women be enslaved and left to the whims of his men, Alexander is shown to have treated them with honor, respect and generosity. He does not treat them like prisoners, but like guests of honor in his camp. Plutarch uses this situation to show Alexander’s compassion and his rationality and sense of justice when it comes to protecting those under his domain. Another example is Alexander’s policy of letting his conquered territories to govern themselves independently and not robbing them of their freedom. Through these merciful and honorable acts of Alexander, Plutarch manages to highlight Alexander’s greatest traits as leader as an individual, and simultaneously support his argument that Alexander is inherently good and exceptional among

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Research Paper

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of Alexander’s first military feats was the battle against the Macedonians and the Thebans. The Thebans were bitter about the treatment they had received from Alexander’s father, Phillip. Phillip had held Thebans prisoners and even executed some of them. So when Alexander became the new Macedonian king after his late

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Khan And Alexander The Great

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Essay

    977 Words  | 4 Pages

    When he encountered Porus at the Hydapses River, he engaged with him in an interesting way. Alexander realizes he cannot cross over the to where Porus was because of his numerous amount of elephants. Alexander decided to trick Porus into battle, and while he did that, he would take Porus’ elephants and use them as his own weapon. (Arrianus, document B). Alexander uses his creativeness to defeat an opponent in a way that would be difficult today.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Vs Plutarch Analysis

    1369 Words  | 6 Pages

    He disagreed with the treatment given to the innocent people of the cities he conquered. He regretted being so harsh and became merciful in his campaign. One such example is when he let a woman go free even after she admitted to having killed a soldier and admitting that she herself was the daughter of a man that had once opposed King Philip, fearless of any repercussions that could have come from her confession. Alexander was also kind to the family of Darius with whom he was fighting. He provided them with decent living space during their fight and even let them know that Darius was not truly dead when they grew distraught at the idea

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    381 Words  | 2 Pages

    First of all, one reason that Alexander was great was because he was a military genius. He was a genius because he conquered so much land and did not stop. In document B it states, “That Alexander made a plan to trick Porus by acting like he was going over the river by making

    Read More

  • Harriet Tubman Strengths

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    Harriet Tubman What is greatness? Is it showing the ability to be strong? It is showing courage? In this world there are many people that are considered to be grate, a good example of a grate person would be the one and only Harriet Tubman. Harriet Tubman is considered a great person because she was a former slave that escaped slavery of the south.

    Read More

  • How Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great's Impact On Future Generations

    1530 Words  | 7 Pages

    Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Alexander The Great And Charlemagne

    1216 Words  | 5 Pages

    This meant that he saw them as an asset to the kingdom whether they were in the military or ordinary citizens. Alexander used his people but not the way Charlemagne did. Charlemagne squeezed out details from anyone who might have a valuable information that he can use for military purposes. His advanced planning and calculation had prevented rebellions domestically and helped him conquered foreign lands. Charlemagne’s military conquest had outlived Alexander and even pass his succession that Alexander did not do.

    Read More

More about Who Is Alexander The Great

Open Document