Andrew Jackson is a man who has traits that are good or evil. The Trail of Tears happened because of him, he killed many famous men in duels, he bought and sold slaves in bulk, and he denied the national bank because it was against his beliefs. Andrew Jackson was loved by some citizens, but he was despised by many more. His tough life as a kid does not excuse him for any of the awful things he did as an adult. Treaties that promised land to the Native Americans were ignored and thrown away. Some may say that Andrew Jackson was a man who only did what he did for America, but was it really for America? The first point we can make about how evil Jackson was what he did to the Cherokee. When the Georgia territory struck gold, the governing body there wanted the Cherokee off the land so they can dig. Jackson agreed with Georgia state. He went to the Supreme Court to issue a Native American Removal Act but the Justices believed that the act was unconstitutional. He ignored them and sent an army to escort the Native Americans, which Jackson thought foreign aliens, to the wild western territory. The trail was called the Trail of …show more content…
He owned many slaves and bought and sold them in large quantities. When one of his slaves escaped him, he offered anyone money to who caught his slaves and lashed them. He killed the runaway slaves as well just like he did to the National Bank. Jackson was strongly against the National Bank and the person who ran it, Nicholas Biddle. After the election the Bank was in bad shape they had too much money going out but not enough going in. This worried Jackson. Then, Congress let the Bank go on with Biddle in charge. Jackson had no choice but to take action and at the end result. Andrew Jackson made the worst economic failure in history because he couldn’t control himself. Britannica stated that the weak economy we have now is still the result of his bias
Andrew Jackson was a controversial figure because he did so many negative things to so much innocent people. He was one of the first imperial presidents and one who was not a Virginia planter or a New England Federalist. Jackson was determined to change the United States; one of his first acts was the Indian Removal Act in May of 1830, which removed five tribes from ancestral homelands (Cave). This act led to thousands of Indian deaths more known as the Trail of Tears. Jackson was also a slave owner; he owned over 100 slaves and believed slaves were put on this earth to labor while whites were there to govern.
Andrew Jackson was not a successful President. Many of his policies were selfish. For example, so me of his monetary policies led to the Panic of 1837. He also ended the Bank of the United States. He took the money form the Bank of the United States and put it into “pet banks”, which contributed to the Panic of 1837.
Andrew Jackson is a villain because, of the Trail of Tears and Westward Expansion. One other is the Indian removal act. these are some of the very things that make Andrew Jackson a villain. The Trail of Tears is one example that Andrew Jackson is a villain. In the trail of tears Andrew jackson killed a lot of Indians in the thousands.
In my opinion, Jackson was more of a villain because of the Trail of Tears and his handling of the national bank. One reason Andrew Jackson was a villain was because of how he handled the Indian removal act which ended in thousands of lives being lost. According to the text.” In the year 1828, a little Indian boy living on ward creek had sold a gold nugget to a white trader”(Station 3).
Andrew Jackson was a good, but busy man. My opinion that he is good is because he helped the people grow and he supported them. He was winning battles with them, he set the people free of debt, and he was a good administrator of the public business. He had to go through so much, but everything he did as president was for the country. Jackson led 5,000 soldiers to an unexpected victory over the British in the Battle of New Orleans, this was the last major engagement of the War of 1812.
Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.
Andrew Jackson has been described as a great hero of his time , but he was a man who was atrocious and destroyed the Union. Andrew Jackson accomplished a great number of things during his life but some of his actions were quite questionable. Looking from the present to the past gives insight into areas where the events can be examined more objectively. However, it is vital when examining past events to keep in mind the mindsets of the past. He thought about himself but not about others.
Andrew Jackson should be viewed as a villain. Primary sources such as ¨Treaty of New Echota¨, ¨Private John G. Burnett's account of the Trail of Tears¨ ¨Warning from the south carolina to Jackson regarding Tariff of 1828¨ and ¨Jackson's response to south carolina, 1832¨ explains that, he should be viewed as a villain because he released Cherokee Indians claims. He mistreated the Cherokees and shipped them out west. Finally, he didn't help the continuance of South Carolina. Jackson released the Cherokees' claims.
The website I chose for this assignment is titled "The Trail of Tears- The Indian Removals", at http://www.ushistory.org/us/24f.asp. I chose this website particularly because I am familiar with it from using it for other assignments. Also, the site always has several helpful pictures and it is full of useful information about my topic. Lastly, the website asks you questions that make you feel involved with the article.
In my opinion, Jackson was a very good president but made terrible and in humane choices. An example of this is Jackson’s approach and actions towards the native Americans and their rights. The trail of tears, which was Jacksons way of moving the Indians, resulted in over 4000 innocent
Andrew Jackson during his time was considered a very patriotic politician he hated the rich, he hated the Indian, and loved the idea of slavery. It has been said that he grew up not educated and had a bad up bring but still managed to get to a high political suture. Jackson at one point was general and had a very decorated portfolio, which made sense he would become president, Andrew was most well know for “The Battle of New Orleans” where Andrew Jackson, prevented the British Army and General Edward Pakenham, from seizing New Orleans nearing the end of that war.
Jackson was obviously pro-slavery considering he owned about 150 slaves. A lot of people believe that this was not really a bad thing considering the times he lived in but in reality, it does not matter. The fact is this man owned many people as if they were his property, knowing they were living breathing human beings like him, is horrendous. Slavery existed to show off wealth and keep wealth in expense of African-American ’s freedom.
In this attack, he moved about 20% of United States’ money into private banks. These banks were known as ‘’pet’’ banks because they politically supported Andrew Jackson. This causes what we know as The Bank War. Andrew Jackson enlarged credit by doing away with the bank. Andrew Jackson then moved the money from those banks into the private ones that only supported him.
Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.
One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”