In Jon Krakauer’s narrative, Into the Wild, 22 year old Chris leaves his family behind to venture off to unexplored scenes all over the U.S. From start to end, he meets various individuals who take him in and teach him essential life lessons. Chris makes his way through the states to find himself in Alaska, and resides in the wilderness for about 3 months, where he eventually passes away. When the McCandless family receives this information, they mourn and question why Chris would abandon them without reason. Chris McCandless has been perceived as irresponsible and ungrateful for leaving his seemingly perfect family, when in reality, he was damaged from past traumas and naive because of his young age. Many were quick to express their opinion …show more content…
In the Ted Talk, Your DNA Does Not Define You, she discusses both her and Chris’s traumatic childhood, which heavily relates to why Chris acted the way he did in his adult years. Carine expresses,” our childhood home was far from peaceful- domestic violence, our father’s gin-included rages, combined with constant lies and manipulations…”(McCandless 2:37). Many presumed that Chris was immoral for leaving his family, not knowing that those various family gifts and pictures were a front to put up for both Chris and his sister’s sufferings. Internally, Chris taking the emotional damage from his overcontrolling parents affected the way he perceived life and others. Thus explaining why he made decisions for himself, whether that meant ignoring others advice or hitchhiking to cities with drastic measures. It was a way to finally express his freedom from his past. Despite the fact that Chris did not have the ideal childhood, he strived to focus on the things that he loved. As he grew up,” Chris was drawn to nature from an early age. He immersed in the peace, the purity and honesty that those surroundings offered him”(McCandless 4:35). Using nature as a coping mechanism was beneficial towards Chris, helping him to see the positive in his life and protect his peace. Nature gave him what he lacked at home; tranquility and answers to his own
Although Chris went to a university for a couple days prior to learning about foods he could eat, he still did not obtain enough knowledge. He memorized a couple of berries he could eat, which did help him survive for a while, but when those started to run out, he grew helpless. He was forced to eat things that could've killed him since he didn't have the proper knowledge of them, which sadly became true. He ate berries along with the nut inside, which turned out to be poisonous. The concepts of weather and naturistic food are the primary keys when it comes to surviving in nature, and Chris didn't learn any of
Chris had to have kept that anger inside and to himself without ever confronting his parents and resolving the issues. It isn't healthy for anyone, least of all a child, to keep any emotions inside for so long. Since finding his father's secret, it strained his relationship with his parents even further and because of that, it might have cause him to be more stubborn and independent, which was both beneficial and damaging for
According to Jim Gallian, on page four, “He wanted to walk deep into the bush and ‘live off the land for a few months.’ ” This shows the fact that Chris wanted to just go straight into nature away from everyone else. Being away from civilization also made it to where he could just truly be himself without being judged or looked down upon. Chris was also an adult who is allowed to make his own choices with his life as long as it doesn’t harm himself intentionally or
However, his parents would often fight and his father was abusive and seceretive. Chris also had a love for nature, and thought that if he emersed himself in it he would find the meaning to life or discover more about himself.
Ryzz Mrs. Moffat English 5-6 11 January 2023 Was Chris Justified? In John Krakauers book Into the Wild, a man named Chris McCandless left everyone he knew in his hometown of Annandale, Virginia as he hitchhiked to Alaska. He burned all of his money and left behind most of his personal belongings, in order to live life to the fullest in the wild. Chris McCandless was justified in leaving his family to travel in the wild simply because he was old enough to decide to cut ties with his abusive family and be happier in life.
He wanted to live a life of simplicity and to be free from the materialism that he saw as corrupting society. However, his actions could also be viewed as selfish and immature. He left his family without warning or explanation and did not think about the impact it would have on them u realize this on page 37 when he gives his entry about living life to the fullest Chris's actions were also dangerous and reckless. He had no experience or training for living in the wilderness, and he put himself in a dangerous situation without any means of communication or assistance. It could be argued that his decision to leave his family was not only selfish but also stupid Now, there are still plenty of angles to look at this situation.
Some would argue his adventure was to escape the real world and embrace nature’s natural beauty. For example, the author writes, “But in reality nothing is more damaging to the adventurous spirit within a man than a secure future. The very basic core of a man’s living spirit is his passion for adventure. ”(Krakauer 40). Nonetheless, Chris was still selfish for leaving behind his loving family, and hard-earned scholarship, and abandoning everything he had.
Dylan Howell Mrs. Moffat English 5-6 11 January 2023 Was Chris Justified? Would you leave behind your life to live in happiness, freedom, and a somewhat fantasy life. In Jon Krakauer’s book Into the WIld Chris McCandless was living a rough life until he decided enough was enough. Chris MCandless was justified in leaving his family without a trace because he wanted a new start to life and a reset, he lived in an abusive home and his family would blame everything on him, and nature made him happy.
He traveled across the United States to the west coast to pursue a physical and mental journey that many would be too scared to do. Chris’s father, Walt, would have this to mention about him, “Chris was fearless even when he was little” (109). Chris believed that adventure was an answer to being lost in life and an essential activity for people to fulfill. Chris would say this in a postcard to Ron Franz remarking, “the joy of life comes from our encounters with new experiences, and hence there is no greater joy than to have an endlessly changing horizon” (57). People should interpret this quote as a call to travel and to see and experience the joy and beauty of the world, not to get caught up in
His family had a prodigious amount of money, lots of money and luxuries, those things that makes people happy. The feeling he had, the feeling of self-realization and a slight resentment of society, for his life is what drove him out, into the wild. If we really look at what
Though many look at Chris McCandless's journey to Alaska as a waste. I truly feel that his extraction from society and its ongoing noise and distractions was necessary for him. If Chris would not have pursued the trip he would not have come to the revelation that he wrote in his journal “Happiness only real when shared. “ Chris`s downfall was his ignorance to survival in the wilderness.
First sentence…..hook? In the novel Into the Wild author Jon Krakauer reveals that Chris McCandless is a hero for abandoning his family and society to run off into the wilderness to sacrifice himself in order to find his true self, his primordial being. Krakauer develops this revelation by presenting a balanced perspective by introducing his family history considering his wealthy upbringing, his mistakes of improvising his time in the wild, and his accomplishments of feeling self-worthy, however, he indulges the reader’s right to make up his or her own mind about Chris McCandless even though Jon Krakauer is biased. ”This is a story of a young man, of his energy, his idealism, and the arrogance that ultimately kills him.
The reason i believe he chose to go to alaska was that there was nothing up there so it would all peaceful and quiet but i also believe that Chris thought if he went to alaska and not had died his family would have never found him and probably still be missing to this day. But then raises another question should Chris have come to his senses and have come out of the woods and have tried to fix his family problems?I also believe the reason chris chose to go to alaska was because of the beautiful alaskan Wilderness the view of alaska do not compare to any other forest because of its all natural look due to not having a lot of deforestation. Honestly i could see why he chose the alaskan wilderness just for its beauty but with that beauty comes with it challenges in the winter time below zero temperatures and in the summertime a lot of wild animals looking for food to eat before
Jose Ruiz Mrs. Moffat English 5-6 11 January 2023 Was Chris Justified? Would you go into the wilderness to find yourself? In the book Into the wild by Jon Krakauer, I will argue if Chris Mccandless was justified in leaving his family without a trace. Chris McCandless abandoned his family; Chris was selfish and reckless with his decisions. Chris McCandless abandoned his family, and he had many reasons to leave his toxic family; Chris wanted to find himself.
He was not concerned with the trivial details of life that most people would have. He constantly tried to get away from society. Chris never wanted to stay in a place for too long. He had a mentality of “Don’t come closer or I’ll have to go / Holding me like gravity are places that pull” (Vedder, Guaranteed). Whenever Chris got close to someone he would always leave.