The Federalist Papers are a series of eighty-five political essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in support of the U.S. Constitution. In No. 51, James Madison argues that, Ambition must be made to counteract ambition”. Madison disagreed with the popular opinion that democracy required virtuous citizens that were actively involved in politics in order to be successful. Instead, Madison believed that it was the way power was spread within the government that determined how successful the democracy was. But if Madison is right and virtuous citizens are not required for a successful democracy, how does this affect citizenship and popular participation in politics? I believe that James Madison is right. We have seen in history that virtuous citizens are not enough to make the government run efficiently. For example, in 1781 to 1789 during the Revolutionary War, Americans had loyalties to their respective states, not to America. Many did not even think of themselves as Americans. This lack of …show more content…
In 1780, Massachusetts adopted a new constitution that seemed to favor the wealthy. As the economy declined, banks foreclosed on farms, many of which were owned by Massachusetts Continental Army veterans who were waiting for their war bonuses. But because the government had no money to pay them and no power to collect it, the veterans had gone unpaid. So, when in 1786 Massachusetts legislature enacted a new law requiring that all debts must be paid in cash, the people were outraged. Fifteen hundred armed and angry farmers marched to the government arsenal. Eventually, the government was able to form a militia and end the rebellion, but as we can see, having virtuous and politically involved citizens was not enough to prevent this tragedy. Without any power, the government couldn’t stop Massachusetts from creating a new and unfair law or from creating money to pay its promised war
James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.
As of recently, there have been reports of an increase in taxes to pay off debts in Massachusetts. A huge number of individuals who couldn 't pay these taxes are farmers, and they ended up finding themselves going to court, then to prison. This issue had led to the start of the Shay 's Rebellion, which was a fight for change between the farmers and the legislatures. I believe that the farmers were making the right decision to oppose the government because of the unfair laws that were placed.
James Madison addressed other delegates by saying: “But I go on this great republican principle, that the people will have virtue and intelligence to select men of virtue and wisdom. Is there no virtue among us? If there be not, we are in a wretched situation. No theoretical checks--no form of government can render us secure. To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea.
Massachusetts, which had suffered one of the greatest burdens economically, socially, and physically by the American Revolution. Poverty, unemployment, and imprisonment due to debt was rampant. Many of the citizen tried to voice their complaints to the state government. The state government, heavy in debt, responded with higher taxes. Angered by this, Daniel Shay, a former war veteran in debt who now faces foreclosure of his farm, started a mob that wreaked havoc on many important establishments such as banks or prisons.
After reading The Federalist Papers #10, 48, and 51 I believe that James Madison saw human nature as being selfish and self-centered, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition" (319). Madison continues on to explicate on his previous thought, "It may be a reflection of human nature that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government" (319). The devices that he talks about are the checks and balances that Madison declares that the government needs. The government needs the checks and balances because Madison believes that trusting one man to govern everything just feeds the selfishness inside the chosen man, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary" (319).
James Madison's assertion, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition," was a crucial development in the making of the American government. This quote shows that Madison knew that Americans had a strong ambition, which meant that these Americans' citizenship would be powerful. These men lived in America when the U.S. Constitution had an instructable will to be involved with the government based on their freedom from Great Britain, so these men would have a large percentage in popular participation and would take advantage of their citizenship. Therefore in this idea, Madison knew that with these men being ambitious, the government also had to be ambitious. After this idea, he knew that not just one person could run the government but
10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.
The most important thing a historian can do is provide the world with a reliable, sound knowledge of history and the truth in what has happened in our society. Without a solid understanding of where we came from, we cannot understand why things are the way they are, how we got here, and where we’re going. The farther back time goes, the harder it is to know for sure what the absolute facts are, however, there is plenty of evidence to let us know what happened during some of the most important time periods of our nation’s history. In The Last Of The Fathers: James Madison & The Republican Legacy, Drew R. McCoy uses both primary and secondary sources to show us facts about James Madison’s life and how he helped to build America. His use of reliable
The fourth president of the United States was born in Port conway, Virginia, in 1751, the oldest of twelve children. James Madison was raised on a plantation in Orange County; at eighteen, he left to attend the College of New Jersey, which is now known as Princeton University. After graduating, Madison realized how interested he was in the relationship between the American Colonies and Britain. When Virginia began preparing for the American Revolutionary War in 1775, he was appointed colonel in the Orange County militia. Realizing that he was physically unfit for fighting, Madison left the militia the next year and instead represented Orange County at the Virginia Constitution Convention to organize a new state government that was not under
Scholars argue that Federalist #10 can be considered the most important explanation of the genius of our federal political system. Written by James Madison, he directed everyone’s attention to the argument in favor of the Constitution, where many believed it established a government that was suited in regulating the corruption done by factions. However, Madison brought to attention the situation in the republican government, where the power is vested in the people, the majority would often sacrifice the minority’s rights to their own egotistical desires. He went further to argue that by setting up an extended republic, including multiple social groups, it would prevent the society from dividing between the wealthy and the poor.
Three of the four delegates from Massachusetts fully supported a strong national government because they had experienced firsthand the problems and conflicts that rebellions create, especially without assistance from a national government. The fourth delegate from Massachusetts also knew the issues rebellions could create and agreed that a stronger national government was needed to prevent such problems, but he argued that a bill of rights was also needed to protect the rights of the people. All of the delegates at the convention had heard stories of the events that had been occurring in Massachusetts and, fearful of similar rebellions in their own states, many changed their perspective of a strong national government, arguing that one was necessary to keep the peace. These fears are what led to such drastic changes in the powers of the national government compared to the Articles of
I would agree with James Madison because he was trying to help the people. He knew men where not angels at all and if they just behaved then they wouldn't need a government. See the government put down policy's when there is a problem going on. The reason why he wants a stronger government because there is more problems. If things where really that bad i would agree with that because it will never get better if they have strong policy's.
James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.
Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.
Due to the fact that Massachusetts was newly settled, yeoman farmers were attempting to build new farms resulting in debt that the farmers could not pay. The yeoman farmers were also in debt because of a post-war recession, lack of payment of their army stipends, and failure to receive payment for their bonds. These debts lead to farmers being arrested which caused the anger that lead to the creation of Shays’ Rebellion. Other states with this problem were passing laws to protect their farmers during this economic crisis, but Massachusetts did not which further angered the lower class. The already poor farmers were forced to give up their land as payment because the farmers could not pay their debts in specie.