Jimmy Carter - Persuasive Techniques
Usually, when people have to give a speech or write an essay they have to convey a message or convince the audience of a specific idea or argument. In this instance it is very important for the speaker to use the correct techniques so they can connect to the audience and convince them of their point of view. For politicians especially they must be able to have the audience intrigued and convinced of their ideas. In his speech to prevent those who wanted to industrialize and drill oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, President Jimmy Carter can be seen using many of the common argumentative techniques, such as logos, pathos, and ethos, to convince his audience against the industrialization of the Refuge. To build his argument, the reader can see Carter use his personal experiences, historical evidence, and alternative options to support his claim.
…show more content…
Carter introduces the audience to his argument not by giving his statement or "mission" immediately but by telling the audience a story of a personal experience that helps the audience sympathize with his point of view. The way Carter describes the beauty of his trip to the Wildlife Refuge and how it was a very personal experience makes the audience feel they are being let in on a personal level to the President's point of view against the drilling in the Refuge. The story of the migration of the porcupine caribou gave the his audience an idea of what the refuge really means and emphasizes how it would all be destroyed if industrialization on the Refuge were to happen. By giving his personal experience first, Carter is able to draw his audience in and let them sympathize with his cause before he actually gives his real argument and calls people to
At the end of his speech, he pointed out six solutions about how to resolve the energy crisis, and stated his position again that he firmly believed they would win this war. The purpose of this speech is obvious, President Carter put forward one of the important issues in America now—energy crisis in the public, and made people regain their confidence to solve the problem. Also, he made his own decisions to pull through the troubles and proposed some
Jimmy Carter and Environmental Conservation In former President Jimmy Carter's account of his visit to the far north Arctic Refuge in "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land," he recalls the unbelievable beauty of the wildlife and nature in the area, calling on conservationists, as well as those whose intentions for the land may permanently damage the wilderness of the region, to consider the effects of construction, industrialization, and oil-drilling in such a rare and environmentally precious area. Carter uses his personal experience in the Arctic Refuge as well as his knowledge of conservationist and environmental affairs as President to establish credibility, along with vivid diction and tone elements to further strengthen his argument against industrial development in an area of the world that should be kept sacred. Carter establishes his knowledge of the Arctic Refuge area almost immediately, recalling his visits to the area with his wife.
Thousands of women have screamed at the top of their lungs, clawed at the patriarchy, and tirelessly fought for their rights as citizens of the United States of America. From the beginning of mankind, women have been labeled as inferior to men not only physically, but mentally and intellectually as well. Only in 1920 did women gain the right to voice their opinions in government elections while wealthy white men received the expected right since the creation of the United States. A pioneer in women’s suffrage, Susan B. Anthony publicly spoke out against this hypocrisy in a time when women were only seen as child bearers and household keepers. Using the United State’s very own Constitution and Declaration as ammunition, Anthony wrote countless
One thing that made this speech so impactful was the use of ethos, and the ways he used to build a relationship with Americans through trust. “And I realize more than ever that as President I need your help. So, I decided to reach out and to listen to the voices of America” (Energy and the National Goals - A Crisis of Confidence). President Carter tried to prove his credibility through his position as President. He tried appealing himself to the audience’s sense of trust.
The 39th president of the United States of America Jimmy Carter fears the domination of domestic use of the Artctic Refuge. Carter argues that it is the duty of everyone to preserve the Arctic Refuge rather than dig holes in it to extract oil. The Arctic Refuge is a crucial refuge as it is one of the few left in the Arctic and around the world. In his letter, Carter uses ethos and pathos to persuade his audience to preserve the refuge and keep it sheltered.
Carter laid out his plan for foreign policy in his Commencement Speech at Notre Dame. Carter’s goals were to focus on Human Rights. In Carter’s eyes he saw protecting human rights as a way to create peace and lessen cultural tension while pointing out American morals. Carter worked with the trilateral commission, whose goals were to adapt to the changing world. In other words do away with the old ways, for U.S. supremacy was over.
President, Jimmy Carter, in his speech, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, argues that Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be kept safe. Carter's purpose is to prevent the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to be developed for industry. He adopts a sympathetic tone in order to get Americans to protect the wildlife. Carter begins his speech by describing the beauty of the Arctic Refuge.
Jimmy Carter builds a compelling argument to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. He has evidence to back up his argument. He uses reasoning to develop ideas and uses persuasive elements to get his point across. Jimmy uses facts or examples to support his claims.
His inclusion of analogies and emotional appeals, combined with his strong sense of authority, brings his arguments into focus and gives them a punch. His power in delivering this speech quite possibly kept America looking towards the stars and propelled them into the next age of space exploration. President Reagan’s speech serves as a touching conclusion to a tragic event. Despite the terrible catastrophe, Reagan’s four-minute speech provided closure on the one-minute tragedy whose impact will be felt for
Rhetorical Analysis: A Crisis of Confidence by Jimmy E. Carter From his speech in the Oval Office, 39th US President, Jimmy Earl Carter uses several rhetorical methods to get his point across to the American public. He rallies the audience to a common goal using diction, charged language, and rhetorical appeals like ethos and pathos. This is all in an attempt to help the citizens of America understand the necessity of confidence in our actions to fight against foreign dependence in the energy crisis. Carter utilizes diction to prove the necessity of his argument through using the repetition of statements pertaining to confidence in one’s actions.
“As a matter of fact, I visited Poland, Yugoslavia and Romania, to make certain,” continued Ford. Jimmy Carter came out with the win that year.’’ (Cramer, 2016) So the debate between Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford really helped open the eyes of the audience to know who they should vote for as their next
When Carter became President the House and Senate had Democratic majorities, so many people thought it would be easy for Jimmy to get laws passed, but it was not that easy. Congress blocked Jimmy’s proposals for welfare reform and for a long-range energy program. Carter was not getting the changes made that he had told the people he would and this
Analyzing Challenger’s Address Delivered on January 28, 1986, Ronald Reagan’s speech addressing the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster was a plausible proof of the possibility to communicate various ideas during a tough situation effectively and efficiently. In a speech that lasted less than five minutes, Ronald Reagan managed to express his thoughts verbally and attempt to persuade his audience through an eulogy, a speech characterized by its epideictic occassion, that had been infused with a deliberative content that did not conflict with the core of the speech. Before one can analyze the details of Ronald Reagan’s speech, understanding the purpose behind the creation of the speech might be useful for understanding the context of the speech as a whole. Based on the speech how it relates to common speech purposes
On August 8th, 1974 at exactly 9:01 pm, Richard Nixon--former President-- gave a speech that would affect both United States history and the american people. Richard Nixon’s argument and claim lay within the textual aspects, in other words, his tone, attitude, and the strategic ways of presenting to his audience. In this historical speech, Richard Nixon broadcasted his character, past decisions, and future advice to the people of the United States in order to justify his resignation from the presidential office. The rhetorical stylistic tools were effective and instrumental in backing up the argument. Recognition of audience was important, because it will determine his attitude and tone, which was innocence.
In this six persuasive principles the researcher will analyze how Obama implement the persuasive principles in his presidential campaign speech. The persuasive utterances made by Obama in the presidential campaign activities were found to use these principles effectively. Moreover, the results of the analysis shows that there are twenty-six ( 26 ) persuasive utterance found which they are divided into ( 2 ) Concistance ( 12 ) Authorithy ( 3 ) Social evidence ( 4 ) Preference ( 4 ) Rareness. The followings are some explanations regarding to the classificaton of the principles. 1.