ipl-logo

Who Is Machiavelli's The Prince Still Relevant Today?

871 Words4 Pages

In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote his key piece of work, ‘The Prince’, as a study of human nature and the political sphere, and put forward a set of characteristics that the next ruler of his home Italian city-state of Florence should abide by. Machiavelli painted a very pessimistic picture of the nature of man, which is a common feature in realist theories today. I will discuss this focus on human nature in both Machiavelli’s work, as well as how it is relevant in contemporary realist theories today, with the example of the work by Hans Morgenthau. I will then offer a feminist critique on this depiction of human nature, arguing that these realist theories allow men, and masculinity, to dominate, at the expense of acknowledging women in politics. …show more content…

Realists, especially the classical realists, argue that their theory is based on objective knowledge and a realistic view of human nature, and that all politics is subject to this manifestation of the corruptible and egotistical human nature (Lebow 2013: 61). This pessimistic outlook of human nature was first introduced by Machiavelli in the 16th century, and is still relevant today as one of the hallmark principles of realist theories. Machiavelli, in writing ‘The Prince’, changed direction from the ‘idealism’ of his political science predecessors, and rejected the traditional morality of their politics (Mindle 1985: 213; Patrick 2014: 1). He sought to observe political life and human nature as they really were, without any delusions or idealism, and thus began the realist school of political science thought (Mindle 1985: 212). Machiavelli’s …show more content…

). Gender is a socially and historical constructed concept, and has asymmetrical power in international relations, often excluding women from political life (Tickner and Sjoberg 2013: 206; True 2001: 236-237). Realists argue that they have put forward an objective and universal knowledge, however feminists argue that their ‘knowledge’ is socially constructed and favours the masculine ideals, and either denying or misrepresenting the women in politics (Tickner 1988: 432; Alexandre 1989: 6 cited in True 2001: 240). As argued by Cynthia Enloe, women have always been a part of international relations but have largely been ignored (True 2001: 239). Realist theorists have made assumptions about masculinity and its relativity to describe human nature, such as characteristics such as rational, self-nterest focuses and autonomous (True 2001: 250). These assumptions are critiqued by feminists as being at best a partial representation of the truth, and argued as continuing the power and knowledge of a male dominated international relations system (Tickner 1988: 429,

Show More
Related

  • Walzer's Arguments In The Prince

    1422 Words  | 6 Pages

    Machiavelli’s arguments in his work The Prince, surrounding ruling and the concept of dirty hands, were utilised in Michael Walzer’s political piece titled, Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Walzer uses Machiavelli’s commentary to advance many of his central points. Throughout his comprehensive article, Walzer effectively utilizes Machiavelli’s arguments that consistently stays true those in The Prince and provides a persuasive reading. In order to understand Walzer’s commentary, it is first important to have an understanding of Machiavelli’s The Prince.

    Read More

  • Human Nature In The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli

    1072 Words  | 5 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli was a standout amongst the well-known philosophers of the Italian Renaissance. He exhibited a drastically unique view of how a prince should run his state than other political philosophers of the time. From his perception of Italian governmental issues and the Medici Family, he believed that Italy required a ruler who could take control over the state and maintain its political power. With this new perspective of politics, Machiavelli wrote his most famous book, The Prince, to draw a line among politics and morals, and accentuated how human nature should attribute to the state should continue to maintain its statue by analyzing historical facts and events. Machiavelli seemed to have a critical look regarding human nature.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli And Christianity And Evil Essay

    651 Words  | 3 Pages

    Machiavelli’s thinking troubled a tremendous amount of people and his challenge to the status quo was interpreted as evil. It was interpreted as evil because it was different from the status

    Read More

  • First Global Age Analysis

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    The main point made by Machiavelli was that men are inherently bad, so a leader must rule in a way that takes this into account. He taught that because of man’s ungratefulness, it is safer to be feared than loved (D-4). This shows that Machiavelli believed that the power and success of a country will lead to the prosperity of its inhabitants. Both influential people believed that a country prospers the most under absolute power.

    Read More

  • Political Perspectives Of Niccolo Machiavelli's Political Views

    926 Words  | 4 Pages

    Machiavelli's Political Views Niccolo Machiavelli is treated as “one of the founders of philosophy of history and one of the first to create a political science based on the studying of historical actions” (“Machiavelli's The Prince”). The man lived in 15th and 16th centuries, but his political views are still appropriate for today, despite the fact his ideas were called dishonest, sinister and cunning. The Prince is one of the most famous Machiavelli's political works. It was written in 1513 and was dedicated to Lorenzo de' Medici. The book is unique “not because it explains how to take control of other lands and how to control them, but because it gives advice that often disregards all moral and ethical rules” (“Machiavelli's The Prince”).

    Read More

  • Aristotle And Machiavelli's Definition Of Politics

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    These ideas of Machiavelli are shown in his text ‘The Prince’. His view on politics strongly influenced the ideas of English political philosopher Thomas Hobbes (Sullivan, 2004). In Hobbes’ book ‘Leviathan’ he further claims that politics is based upon self-interest; that is inevitable to avoid conflicts. Both Machiavelli and Hobbes thought that politics is about power and self-interest. These two prominent philosophers well explain what politics is and they may define the most appropriate definition of politics in the 21st century.

    Read More

  • The Prince Research Paper

    1531 Words  | 7 Pages

    Gür Ağcı Ms. Amy 12 Advanced English 11 May 2015 YEARLY PROJECT Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: A Follower of The Prince One of the most notable philosophers of the Renaissance age, Machiavelli truly opened a new era in political philosophy. Up until then, philosophers such as Rousseau, Marx and Plato elaborated on the ideal instead of basing their ideas on real life events. Machiavelli objected his predecessors and defended: “There is such a gap between how one lives and how one should live that he who neglects what is being done for what should be done will learn his destruction rather than this preservation” (Machiavelli, 72). In this sense, Machiavelli introduced the term political realism. In his most established work The Prince, he outlined

    Read More

  • Niccoolo Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis

    847 Words  | 4 Pages

    Niccoolo Machiavelli is an Italian writer born in 1469 and one of the most influencing writers in the history of politics. Machiavelli finished writing his famous book “The Prince” in 1514, however, the book was published in 1532 after his death. Machiavelli wrote the prince as a guide for rulers to maintain and escalate their power, therefore, he was realistic and down to earth and instead of using ideal republics he spoke the truth of the human nature and how to survive the obstacles in order to become a great “prince”. Some people claim that Machiavelli is the devil and his book is evil full of fear and hatred, however, I firmly believe that Machiavelli’s theories are wisely balanced as he did not turn a blind eye on the importance of being

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    580 Words  | 3 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher, politician, and is known for being the writer of the Renaissance period. Today, Machiavelli’s legacy still lives on being that his political philosophies were very harsh and firm. Machiavelli composed many books, however, one of his most notable pieces of work is The Prince, a book that sets basic guidelines for how to rule. Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli intelligently sets guidelines for the systems that a ruler must take after to keep up his position and represent his state.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's The Morals Of The Prince

    179 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “ The Morals of the Prince”, Machiavelli argues the prince should be feared if they want to get their position or control

    Read More

  • Humanity And Virtue In Machiavelli's The Prince

    782 Words  | 4 Pages

    In The Prince, Machiavelli establishes a primitive and inherently negative view of human nature that centers around man’s obsession with self-preservation through the means of obtaining power. It is this thinking that propels his understanding of the nature of a prince as a leader, and the qualities he must possess due to the nature of his subjects, which validates the natural fear he must have to lose his rule. This logical deduction of fear justifies his perception that the strong are in fact virtuous in respect to the preservation of the state when they are committing vicious acts on its behalf. His fundamentally caustic beliefs about the nature of humanity are the base upon which his understanding of principalities and the relative power

    Read More

  • Realism Vs. Idealism In Machiavelli's Republic

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    Sheldon Wolin argues that this is an “economizing frame of mind” (202) that Machiavelli had in his comments on violence. However, Hulliung maintains that it is “in reality an aspect of the heroic code and its call for glorious action” (202). This calls back to the previous two interpretations of Machiavelli whose claims have been refuted with simply Machiavelli’s few for collective glory and virtu. The “economy of violence” was in actuality practiced by the “commercially-minded ruling class of Florence” (202). While Machiavelli believed that being deliberate and careful with the way violence was carried out was important, he also believed “unlimited conquest, growth, and aggrandizement [was] the objective” (202).

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    1306 Words  | 6 Pages

    Niccolò Machiavelli wrote a book which called The Prince. It is about the political ideology of Machiavelli's political realism, which means the effective truth is taken to be more important than any abstract ideal. In this book, he talks about the importance of the concept of virtú. He claimed that rulers have to suppress their personal virtues while sometimes committing improper acts in order to maintain powers and protect their principalities. In Discourses, Machiavelli becomes to extols the virtues of a republic.

    Read More

  • Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    I'm Niccolo Machiavelli and I was born on May 3, 1469, in Florence, Italy, I was a diplomat for a long time in Italy's Florentine Republic amid the Medici family's exile. I composed "The Prince" book for politicians on the utilization of heartless, rousing the expression "Machiavellian." My perspectives of human nature firmly impacted my suggestions for governing. The Prince is a handbook for how one ought to rule. To my comprehension of human nature, it was an absolute rebellion of what humanists lectured and attempted to show others.

    Read More

  • Anthropological Argument Analysis

    415 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the first part I addressed the examples of Machiavelli and Schmitt whose "extreme" and "negative" view of human nature has led them to develop the political conceptions praising the strong state and focusing on the idea of conflict. Nonetheless, I maintained that their approaches point to the lack of ethics which I considered an apparent disadvantage. The second chapter was dedicated to another, in my opinion, "extreme" case, namely, theories of Kant and Rawls. Both of them adopt more "positive" conception of a human as a reasonable and rational being. I have tried to show that, although they convincingly bring together politics and ethics, their theories

    Read More

More about Who Is Machiavelli's The Prince Still Relevant Today?

Open Document