Upon first seeing the book, The Good Earth, I thought it was going to be absolutely tedious, however, my judgement was proven incorrect after I read it. The novelist of the book, Pearl S. Buck, did a competent job at captivating her audience, but with the historical and dramatic elements that she incorporates in this tale, she is able to possess her readers with some unknown desire to keep reading.
In this story, a devoted Chinese farmer, named Wang Lung, dreams of wealth, success, and strives to become like the honorable Hwang family- a local family who takes pride in their decadent lifestyle. When everything is finally in his grasp, his world begins to fall apart. The author manages to take her audience along on a journey of this man’s life
…show more content…
The author is able to show her readers this by describing Wang Lung’s longing for the connection to the earth when he is no longer in its presence. “But Wang Lung thought of his land . . . with the sickened heart of deferred hope, how he could get back to it. He belonged, not to this scum . . . of a rich man’s house . . . He belonged to the land and he could not live with any fullness until he felt the land under his feet and followed a plow in the springtime and bore a scythe in his hand at harvest” (123). She uses this quote to tell how one can feel so lost and wrecked when they’re away from the very thing that gave them life. After all, the land is considered to be “one’s flesh and blood” (52). Another one of the many morals found within this story is that wealth can cause a person to neglect what they value most. Along with wealth comes the need to constantly display one’s opulence with lavishing items. “There is this and that which we need in this house and we must not think we can be a great family just because we live in these inner courts” (309). In this case, Wang’s family begins to lose interest in the things that they once used to work so hard for and rather than be appreciative, they continue to seek out items that are of more value and higher …show more content…
For example, the beginning of the book drags on; has a low tempo; and isn’t very intriguing. A book should jump out at a reader and instantly captivate them, but this novel didn’t do that for me. Also, it contained lots of foreshadowing, thus making the book a little too predictable. Pearl S. Buck should have incorporated more action, more excitement, more plot twists and things or actions that will cause a reader to never want to put the book down.
Overall, The Good Earth was not a book that captured my attention. This novel left me discontented and I felt as though it ended quite abruptly. I expected for this book to include a bit more action and drama as well. On the contrary, I did like the historical element that was included and also the major plot twist at the end. If anyone wants to know the ending, they’ll just have to read the book to find
Overall, the book is a great read, even for those who do not enjoy
I did not have many complaints. Even though, at times, I may have felt there was information or conversations that were not entirely needed, it did add more depth to the book and allowed the reader to see more into each individual
The loss of home became one loss, and the golden time in the West was one dream” (p.193). Steinbeck demonstrates these families become one family and they all depend on each other instead of being independent or self-centered. They will help each other, and they will encounter the challenges together so no will feel alone during the process of rebuilds their lives. The readers can view the difference that once Thoreau said
I went and read several other reviews on this story and the majority said that they loved this book. And another can be also added to that list, myself. I absolutely fell in love with this book. After getting a couple of chapters in, the story really started to pull me in. I would look at the clock and realize that I had been reading for over an hour when it felt like I had been reading for twenty minutes.
Even though it was such a short book, it seemed complete. There weren’t gaps in the story like I’ve seen countless times in other short books. Nothing seemed to be missing, and there was a full
Although there are a few parts i did not like. Sometimes her use of description was a bit of a bad thing. For example the ending did seem a bit unfair and unfinished. they told about events but never tells what happens
There were some positive things throughout the story. One example, is the author did a decent job of creating suspense. This means the author kept building on the main conflict that kept the reader interested in the story. For instance, in the story, Kyle locked Cameryn in his chicken coop and threatened to hurt her. However, his tactics kept in question
In Rachel Sherman’s “A Very Expensive Ordinary Life: Conflicted Consumption,” the argument centres around the “legitimization” of wealth by the New York’s upper class in order to be seen as not only rich, but morally worthy. The possession of great wealth alongside their less fortunate peers could be uncomfortable also for those that hold the city’s riches. Hence, New York’s affluent has “legitimized” their wealth and consumption, or on a more macro level, the inequality between the social classes in the city in order to feel more comfortable in their spending, and to manage the impression of the wealthy in the eyes of the greater public in the much morally contested behaviour of lavish spending in an unequal society. This is supported throughout the reading by the justification of excessive spending and consumption by the claim that the rich live an “ordinary” life. The need that they feel towards justifying their spending comes to show that their amount of spending is excessive in the eyes of the ordinary person, in which they also acknowledge themselves as well.
It was slightly confusing at times, and the plot would be somewhat boring at times. Most of the characters were developed well, but some characters were confusing and seemed all over the place. The conflict, however, was very true to life, as elephant poachers do exist, and it’s apparent that the author did her research. The ending was quite bittersweet, as Date Bed had died by the time the family found her, and makes the reader unsure whether the elephants did end up making it to the Safe Place after all. There is also a lot of in-depth analysis required to fully understand the book, else the reader may get quite lost in the plot.
The previously poor Kino was overcome by the thoughts of the greatness that the pearl held when he could see the wealth in the pearl, and the happiness it would bring. Kino was a poor person, had a poor family and had been looked down upon his whole life. However, for once, he was able to look down on the pearl and see his great future. “Kino looked into the pearl...and in the incandescence of the pearl, the pictures formed of the things Kino’s mind had considered in the past and had given up as impossible.” (Steinbeck 24).
Moving to what was the epitome of wealth, and an embodiment of the American Dream, Nick immediately feels unnoticed and as if he’s a nuisance to the other characters, for he states that “...[his] house was an eye-sore but it was a small eye-sore and it had been over-looked” (10). Illustrating the underlying theme, because Nick, who had chased the American Dream to a city, was instantly affected by the dream’s isolation, for his comment on the house is a reflection of how he views himself, an eyesore that had been overlooked. Moreover, Nick’s feelings of loneliness do not dissolve, in fact, these feelings, that derived from the American Dream, become magnified later in the novel when Nick reveals that “...it would be a privilege [for him] to partake vicariously [through other characters’] emotions” (138). Demonstrating Nick’s perpetuating alienation from other characters caused by him chasing the American Dream, for the quote depicts him fantasizing about hiding himself in other
Uday Sethi English 10 Monday, October 5, 2015 Comparative Essay A seeking for identity shown through evolution takes place in both “The Chinese Seamstress” and “The Handsomest Drowned man”, seen through the development of characters from narrative stories that help them grow as individuals who live in societies that are isolated and unknown from the rest of the world. The way the narratives impact the characters and society in the two stories help them seek a new identity that could not be discovered without them. The novel “The Chinese Seamstress” is a great way to exemplify development of knowledge and character seen through two major characters, the narrator and the seamstress.
More importantly, the earth that the narrator is unwilling to dig is a symbol of the conflicts in communication between two
In Duong Thu Huong’s Paradise of the Blind, Hang has been placed on a path of self-sacrifice and duty by her family. Her life unfolds in stages- childhood, young adulthood, and her eventual role as an exported worker in Russia. With each of these shifts in her life comes a shift in setting and a shift in her emotional state. Hang’s changing emotional state depicts her “coming of age” and her growth as a character. Setting is important to creation of shift in the novel, and is often described in detail.
As the novel demonstrates, Lung has multiple values that he follows, but he also has made countless mistakes and has many faults as well. This novel focuses on the values and flaws that Wang Lung possesses. He makes mistakes that people in today’s society might make. People in today’s world, go and think about the mistakes and faults that might have been made or have the potential of being made, and change them. Try to prevent problems before they occur.