The narrator of the book monster is a 16 year old boy named Steve. He is a film class student in Harlem. He is on trial for murder with another person he knows from his city. Steves notebook may not be the truth. Steve is an unreliable narrator because he has a reason to lie so he doesn’t get put in prison,he knows that the prosecution will see his notebook, he unsure about if he did anything wrong. Steve is an unreliable narrator because he has a reason to lie so he doesn’t get put in prison. Steve doesn’t want to spend his youth in prison. Steve wrote in his notebook “I want to be away from this place so bad, away from this place, away from this place.” There is no way to be sure that he is telling the truth. If he did commit the crime it would benefit him to lie making him unreliable. …show more content…
Anything he writes in the notebook could be used against him in the trial. Steve wrote in his notebook “Before she left, Ms. O’Brien warned me not to write anything in my notebook that I did not want the prosecutor to see.” If he did commit the crime and he told the truth in the notebook they could use that to put him in prison. This gives him another reason to lie making him unreliable. Another reason Steve is unreliable is he’s not sure if what he did was wrong. Steve admits in the book that he did go into the drugstore and later says he’s unsure if he’s telling himself the truth. Steve says “anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around. Is that what I’m on trial for?“ Steve later writes in his notebook “and I knew she felt that I didn’t do anything wrong. It was me who wasn’t sure.” He could’ve convinced himself he didn’t do anything wrong. He admits to not knowing if he was wrong in the situation making him an unreliable
In court, Ms. Petrocelli was talking about Steve being involved with the crime. The author wrote “‘The man who was to enter the store and check it out is sitting at the other table. His name is Steven Harmon.”’ (Myers 24). Steve probably being involved with the crime of helping the criminals with robbing the store shows that he is a bad person.
Throughout the book Steve shows signs of being scared. for example, when he is mopping the floor with his other inmates Steve starts feeling nausea looking at the rest of his inmates wearing the same suit he is wearing and doing the same activity as him. Steve’s biggest conflict in the story is himself. He starts feeling his self doubt
This statement proves that no one is fully sure that he is guilty or not. This makes Steve a good person because when you read, later in the novel Steve was found innocent. Also, Steve writes about Mr. Nesbitt. In the book Steve writes, “I
In Steve's journal he wrote, “What did I do? I walked into a drugstore to look for
In the courtroom Steve had some troubles with a lot of racism and prejudice. Steve decided to go on the stand to prove his point otherwise they wouldn't believe him and the task wasn’t that easy but somehow he managed. The jury saw him through and he was claimed not guilty. His lawyer O’Brien wasn’t that happy in fact we think that she thought he was actually
Steve is fighting with himself to figure out whether he is a monster. In Monster, Myers examines his idea of a monster through a court case. Firstly, Steve is fighting himself to try and find who he truly is. Disappointing, devastating, discriminating, the boy fights for his rights in front of the jury.
Additionally, lying to a jury, also called perjury (lying under the oath to tell
(Myers 235)This proves Steve is a good person because he still cares about if people die,nesbitt and him were not even close and he felt upset about what happened to him. He was disturbed that people would do that to an old man that worked his whole life just to get that drug store. It made him feel sick to his stomach and felt like humanity was falling. Furthermore,During this, Jerry and Steve were on the couch watching tv, Jerry said that they should be superheroes and help people. Steve said that would be cool because he could help people when they need help, when they are hurt, and when they are in danger.
Steve Harmons actions depicted his characteristics and we can, therefore, conclude that Steve Harmon is a liar as he lied under oath. Steve was also a guilt-ridden man ashamed of his actions. People who disagree may claim that Steve was undoubtedly innocent as Lorelle Henry, a witness, declared that there were only 2 people, proven to be James King and Bobo Evans, inside the store who eventually murdered Mr.Nesbitt. This may be a strong argument because it shows that Steve was not in the drugstore and could be really innocent. On the contrary, however, Steve’s job was just supposed to be a lookout and ensure that the drugstore was clear of cops or anyone inside.
He depends on others to bring clarity to his mind, such as saying, “What did I do?”. After the session at court was finished, Steve was insecure about what Ms. O’Brien, his lawyer, thinks of him. He writes an entry about it: “Who was Steve Harmon? I wanted to open my shirt and tell her to look into my heart to see who I was, who the real Steve Harmon”(92). During the trial, Ms. O’Brien stays distant from him.
(Myers 58). This shows Steve is a good person because he wants to help the world. He would do this by saving people. This has more evidence than him being a criminal because criminals don’t save people, they kill people. That is not what he wants to do.
The book said, “‘Usually I see him in the playground. Maybe he’d say something like “Those guys can’t play ball,” stuff like that.’” (Myers 226). So when Steve gave his testimony he started lying saying things like how
We know this when the author wrote, “I didn’t kill Mr. Nesbitt.” (Myers 140). Steve is a good person because he didn’t kill Mr. Nesbitt and we know this because later in
He said that he did not go in the store that day but he did. He also said that he is not friends with James king but he is. He also said that he will not lie during the testimony. but he lied six times during the testimony. Steve was a monster because he did not tell the police about the
The narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper” is unreliable because she cannot determine reality from hallucinations and cannot express herself because she is dominated by her role as a woman. The most unreliable narrator out of all the short stories is the wife who narrated the short story The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman because she cannot distinguish reality. On the other hand, some would say that the narrator from Strawberry Spring by Stephen King is the most unreliable narrator because he is a serial killer and has no recollection of the murders he has committed. The narrator from The Yellow Wallpaper is the most unreliable because she cannot