In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the author describes the characters’ beliefs and values through the actions. The protagonist, Rainsford is a hunter who believes that the animals he hunts have no emotion. While he was sailing to Rio on a yacht, there are gun shots that cause him to fall overboard. After falling into the water, he swims until he reaches the shore of the island, Ship Trap, and meets the owner, General Zaroff. As Rainsford converses with him, he ends up playing Zaroff’s “game” dedicated to all lost sailors. During the “game,” Rainsford realizes that Zaroff hunts for reasons that are different from his beliefs. Ultimately, the characters’ actions reveal that immorality and corruption cohabit the …show more content…
While he converses with Rainsford, he tells him that “[killing] supplies [him] with the most exciting hunting in the world” (17). In addition, when he “[invented] a new animal hunt,” he never [grows] bored” of hunting them, because he has finally found something that can “match [his] wits” (17). Once Zaroff reveals the ideal animal to Rainsford, he appears to be extremely shocked by his answer. Zaroff then takes this as his queue to tell him that he believes “life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs to be, taken by the strong” (18). The general explains to him that he thinks “the weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure,” (18) and since his is given the gift to be strong, he should use it to his own desire. All in all, Zaroff’s words and actions indicates that he is an immoral man who holds himself really high up on the spectrum of the strong and the …show more content…
He believes that the huntees do not understand fear, while his friend, Whitney, tells him that hunting is not “the best sport in the world” (10) for the animals being hunted. Afterwards, when he converses with Zaroff after arriving on his island, Rainsford calls him a murderer from the killings he has done from his “game.” He tries to explain the differences between his belief and Zaroff’s, but Zaroff does not seem to understand. Rainsford tries to describe to Zaroff that killing animals is acceptable, while killing one’s own species is a sin. Shortly after Rainsford escapes the general’s “game” using his experiences from the past, he is declared the winner. Zaroff, telling him beforehand that the winner gets to live, takes this time to say his final words to Rainsford. He says that “one of [them] is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in [an] excellent bed” (27), showing that he follows the rules he makes. Rainsford, however, shows no sign of compassion to his loss and then watches Zaroff get killed by the hounds. The experience makes Rainsford decide that “he [has] never slept in a better bed” (27), now that he no longer has to worry about playing Zaroff’s game in the future. The obstacles Rainsford experience shows the reader how he slowly becomes more immoral and goes against his past beliefs after his meeting with General
what you speak of is murder” (Connell 5). Rainsford is very astonished by this, if you couldn’t tell. The reader can infer that this isn’t the only time that Zaroff has killed a person because he made a game of it. Usually, when someone commits a murder, they are punished
He is greeted by a man named General Zaroff. A hunter like him but something is off about him. He hunts Humans. The only animal that can reason. Rainsford is in a terrible situation.
To begin with, I will be characterizing and analyzing the character Zaroff. Zaroff is meticulous and audacious. Additionally, he is meticulous in many different ways, when it comes to how he decorates his house he is especially meticulous. As Connell states, “There was a medieval magnificence about it; it suggested a baronial hall of feudal times with its oaken, panels,its high ceiling, its vast refectory tables. ”(44)
In Richard Connell’s, “The Most Dangerous Game”, Connell utilizes rising action, suspense, and characterization of Rainsford to convey the theme of power of mind against the power of authority. When Rainsford was in the forest being hunted down by General Zaroff, Rainsford had to make a quick decision when he thinks, “He could stay where he was and wait. That was suicide” (p.14). In this quote, Rainsford thinks about his odds of surviving and what he needs to do or what General Zaroff wants him to do, which is to die.
In the short story The Most Dangerous Game by: Richard Connell General Zargoff one of the main characters makes a statement saying that the world is full of hunters and huntees. He makes this statement because it’s foreshadowing the contest Rainsford and Genral Zargoff would have. This statement is not true. The world is not made up of hunters and huntees. There also the people in between them.
In the short story The Most Dangerous Game, the author Richard Connell shows that Rainsford needs control of his emotions, patience , and expert hunting and decision making skills in order to defeat Zaroff. Rainsford needs to gain control of his emotions to outthink Zaroff, who symbolizes Rainsfords "steep hill". When he finds that he is going to be hunted his natural instinct is to run and panic, but then he stops to look around and get a grip on the task at hand. Then at a critical moment when Zaroff finds him in a tree, Rainsford panics again because he realizes Zaroff is on his trail and is toying with him. Once again, he gains control of his emotions and formulates a plan.
Zaroff says, “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if needs to be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. ”(9) They both believe in the concept of survival of the fittest, or that the more dominant individual
“I am strong, I hunt the scum of the earth”(17). He only kills them because he wants to hunt something that can reason, something that can change its mind when faced with a life or death situation. “But they are men,” said Rainsford hotly. “Precisely,” said the general”(17). Zaroff is an apex hunter, and he demands the ultimate prey.
However, it does not change for the better. In the middle of the story when he finds out Zaroff hunts fellow human beings, to Zaroff's surprise, Rainsford’s thought and reaction is utter shock and disbelief. “‘But you can’t mean-’ gasped Rainsford. ‘And why not?’”(10). Zaroff knowing Rainsford was a great hunter he hoped that Rainsford would accompany him on a hunt; however, Rainsford accuses him of being a cold-blooded killer.
Firstly, in the story The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because on the island the only way to live is if the stranded people hunt or the stranded will in contrast become the ones being hunted. In the beginning of the story Rainsford is talking to Whitney about jaguars. Whitney is stating that the jaguars must feel some sort of feeling like fear or terror but in contrast Rainsford states that the jaguars have no understanding of feelings. Then Rainsford is put on a island where he symbolically represents the jaguar and General Zaroff would symbolically represent the hunter.
Rainsford has the difficulty to make himself continue on in the hunt while in a state of fear and fighting in the external conflict of the jungle around him. In the resolution of the main conflict, Rainsford exemplifies Connell’s central idea in that he kills Zaroff out of a survival instinct and not from a standpoint of
Rainsford is on his own in the woods with General Zaroff. General Zaroff character trait of challenging, motivates Zaroff to tell Rainsford, “you’ll find this game worth playing,” the general said enthusiastically. “[Rainsford] brain against [Zaroff]. [Rainsford] woodcraft against [Zaroff], [Rainsford] strength and stamina against [Zaroff]”(30). Rainsford now knows that he’s in this game with General Zaroff and that he’s being put to the test of hunting.
”(The Most Dangerous Game) This shows that Rainsford has learned the theme of the story because when he says that he is saying that he is still a trapped animal that has to fight back. This shows that he now knows how it felt to be hunted, and to be trapped and having to fight back and take risks to survive. Before the events that occurred in the story Rainsford had no idea how the animals felt and didn’t care how they felt, but after those events he knew how they felt and thought while being hunted and definitely cared about how they felt because he knew how much it hurt
When comparing stories the reader may point out revelations about human nature. The two awesome stories, Lord of the Flies and The Most Dangerous Gameshow a motif of being trapped, and they show that being nice can be taken for granted. Lord of the Flies and The Most Dangerous Gameprove that people can behave like animals when it comes to survival. There are several different simalarities for the two trapped stories Lord of the Flies and Most Dangerous Game; however, the most significant would be the setting of the stories. For example when Golding was explaining what the island looked like.
"The Most Dangerous Game" statement of The world is made up of two classes -- "the hunters and the huntees" is a great statement that makes sense. The Most Dangerous Game is about a man named Zaroff who lives on an island by himself. The people that come to the island get trained to get ready for the game. The game involves people going through the jungle, hiding from Zaroff as he hunts them. Both the hunters and the huntees have a different view on the conflict.