One of the greatest men in history died at the peak of his success in a terribly miserable manner due to his lack of greatness. Alexander the Great was named Alexander “the Great” for a reason. He was one of the most celebrated conquerors in history, who never lost a battle. All the Greeks admired Alexander the Great and his remarkable conquering skills. However when he was at the peak of his greatness and was about to receive honors, he died a sudden death. There have been many theories regarding how Alexander the Great died, but none were proven. Even though the events leading to Alexander the Great 's death will never be proven, much evidence points to his drinking as the reason for his demise. By the age of 33, Alexander the Great conquered …show more content…
Even after Cleitus death Alexander the Great continued to drink whether it be in his free time, or at parties. Alexander the Great was to stubborn to change his ways after killing his general Cleitus and seemed to learn nothing from the situation. One night Alexander the Great was out at a party drinking as normal when he suddenly became feverish. “He had been drinking at a private party the night before with his senior staff, and after returning from his quarters he became feverish.” It came as no surprise that Alexander the Great got sick from his drinking as he was addicted and just could not stop. Alexander the Great was addicted to liquor and his addiction led him to feel sick. Some theories are that on this night Alexander the Great was poisoned, and had a sudden back pain but this is not the case. “Alexander drank all night. That night and the next day till he at last found a fever coming on him…[Alexander the Great] did not, however experience sudden pain in his back.” Alexander the Great drank all day and all night. This is the reason his fever came about not because he was poisoned it is because he was addicted to drinking. Alexander the Great 's drinking caused him to have a sudden fever. At this point Alexander the Great drinking and fever put him in a terrible …show more content…
Because Alexander the Great was weakened by both his drinking and fever, he was vulnerable. Any of his enemies who wanted to hurt him had their chance. Some of those enemies were Antipater, his tutor Aristotle, and any of the generals that may have turned against him. The one who most likely murder Alexander the Great was Antipater, Antipater had worked for Alexander the Great 's father Philip. Antipitar may have had a reason to kill Alexander the Great as, “Alexander sent orders for [Antipitar] to surrender his post and report to Babylon.” Antipater was not very happy with Alexander the Great for this decision as well as killing one of his companions Cleitus. Antipitar saw an opportunity to poison the great Alexander as he was at his weakest point. Antipitar then collected the poison from the styx river and made a plan to kill Alexander the Great. After he collected the poison, “Antipater sent with his son a draught toxic water that was collected from the legendary river Styx.” Antipater sent his son to a party that Alexander the Great had to attend. Even with his fever Alexander the Great was told he had to attend a party and continued to drink. Antipater son found a way to get the poison into Alexander the Great drink as Alexander the Great wine pourer looked away. Then Alexander the Great drank the wine and that’s when, “Alexander cried out from a stabbing pain in his back after drinking a goblet of wine.” Alexander the Great had gotten poisoned, and died shortly after in
However, recently historians have started to contradict this opinion. Though many people think Alexander was great, he was not a great leader because he did not plan for his death, he thought himself better than he was, and he used brutal methods to conquer land. A great ruler should provide a good example to their people,
The people of the Roman Republic were so complimentary of Alexander that they actually started to treat him like a god. Kanye West is not the only man in history to be this obsessed with himself; Alexander of Macedon loved himself just the same. Worthington continues, “It was plain stupidity on his part if he thought his men would embrace the custom with relish, and his action clearly shows that he had lost touch with his army and the religious beliefs on which he had been raised” (Worthington par 17). Here Worthington explains the reactions of his people when Alexander introduced the idea of proskynesis.
He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent
The fact that Alexander’s army went off on killing sprees during their downtime, he abandoned his kingdom, and he lied and took advantage of his people is why Alexander the Great is a villain. This is why Alexander the great is really not so great after all. ALexander was more focused on himself then what he could do for his army and his civilization. “I am not afraid of an army of lions led by sheep. I’m afraid of an army of sheep led by lions” Alexander the Great once said.
Alexander the Great built an empire by stealing land from blameless people from weaker armies. Alexander was not a hero, but a terrible dreaded villain; Alexander the not so great. He was a villain because of his superstitions, immaturity in battle, and the sheer quantities of conquered land and killed enemies. Alexander was a really bad person, a villain. Alexander is not great because he killed one of his soldiers for luck.
In Parallel Lives by Plutarch, he portrays Alexander the Great as an outstanding moral individual and an excellent leader of his people. Although Plutarch illustrates Alexander as a wise, compassionate, and ambitious individual, his defense of Alexander against the people who think of Alexander as a bad leader is weak and inefficient. Plutarch’s defense of Alexander’s fallible qualities, such as his drinking problems and his apathy to his people at the later part of his life is questionable and easily disproved, weakening his argument that Alexander is a truly admirable person. The majority of the beginning of Alexander is dedicated to the description of Alexander’s background and his experiences as he grows up into a mature and ambitious
Alexander the Great inherited his throne from his father, which was assassinated in 336 BC. He also inherited a strong kingdom and an experienced army. He was tutored
I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.
The first reason Alexander the great wasn't so great after all, is because he was arrogant. Arrogance comes when one has too much pride, and behaves in a unkind way, for example Alexander. To begin with, in Document A there are as many as 10 cities named after himself. Firstly, this shows arrogance because he did not conquer the cities alone, his soldiers were very handy but he didn't share his victory with them. What also makes Alexander arrogant is when in Document D he cared too much about the prophecy that he painfully had the solider killed, when the soldiers only intention was to get Alexander his hat back safely.
He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
Being a good leader does not necessarily mean shining in the spotlight. Some of the most revolutionary and successful leaders are the ones who worked the lights. Self-awareness, self-direction, vision, ability to motivate, and social awareness are the characteristics of a good leader according to SIY Leadership Institute (SIYLI). There have been many accomplished and renowned leaders in America since (and before) the 1770’s, ones whose names are universally known and others who are unfamiliar. Of the latter is Alexander Hamilton, who showed potential since the minute he was put on earth, for no matter what obstacles were thrown in his way he forged ahead and never threw away his shot.
While a literary device, tragic heroes also appear in real life. A perfect example of a real life tragic hero is Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury. This modern tragic hero started life as an orphan in poverty, living in the Caribbean, but his elevated character of exceptional literary skills, wit and progressive political ideas eventually landed him a spot as one of the most influential people in the United States. Alexander Hamilton had a positive hamartia, as he refused to remain quiet about the injustices of his country, oblivious to the danger it created for him and his family. The downfall of Hamilton occurred gradually.
Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.
King Tut has died a mysterious death. There are three theories I believed that have caused King Tut’s death. One theory was murder, I think he might have been murder by Aye and Horemheb. Another theory was an illness. The third theory was a chariot crash.