ipl-logo

Why Alexander The Great Wasn T So Great After All

719 Words3 Pages

The first reason Alexander the great wasn't so great after all, is because he was arrogant. Arrogance comes when one has too much pride, and behaves in a unkind way, for example Alexander. To begin with, in Document A there are as many as 10 cities named after himself. Firstly, this shows arrogance because he did not conquer the cities alone, his soldiers were very handy but he didn't share his victory with them. What also makes Alexander arrogant is when in Document D he cared too much about the prophecy that he painfully had the solider killed, when the soldiers only intention was to get Alexander his hat back safely. The soldier didn't know any better and he only meant to put the hat on his head so that he would be able to swim back without …show more content…

Alexander was ruthless in the sense he showed no compassion or pity for anyone that did not oblige him. In Document C written by Peter Green in 1991 it stated that as many as 7,000 Tyrians died, 2,000 military age men were crucified, and not only but 30,000 people were sold as slaves. Yes, death is terrible but when death comes from crucifixion it's worse. Crucifixion is the execution of a person by binding or nailing them too a cross. Clearly it sound very painful and no one deserves to die in such manner, but Alexander thought otherwise before killing 2,000 men this way. This made Alexander ruthless because noticeably he was mean and harsh, he did not show mercy to anyone who tried to come in the way of him ruling and conquering more land. Also, proven in Document E an estimation of 100,000 enemy soldiers and civilians were killed in only 4 major battles. This makes Alexander ruthless because, 100,000 is not a small number and to have killed so many people in just the time of 4 battles it can be concluded that he did not like anyone who disagreed with him being the leader of all, so he did what he thought was best and killed anyone without the smallest amount

Show More
Related

  • To What Extent Was Alexander The Great Cruel

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, in the Legend of the Hat Band, he rewarded an innocent person who had done a service to him by killing him, showing that he relied so much on the legends that he was willing to kill a loyal soldier because it was thought that he might be a threat. He cared so much about legends that he was willing to sacrifice one of his own men. This does not seem like the act of someone ethical or wise as a great leader should be. A third reason that Alexander should not be considered great is that he used brutal methods to conquer land.

    Read More

  • What Was Philip II's Reign Of Alexander The Great?

    820 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander’s military brilliance was unquestionable. He was a leader invincible in both, siege warfare and set battles. In addition to that, his intelligence and communications skills were immaculate. The Roman historian Arrian, in his account Alexander Puts Down a Mutiny, explains Alexander’s ability of communication and leadership skills, “[M]arching out from a country too poor to maintain you decently, [I] laid open for you at a blow, and in spite of Persia’s naval supremacy, the gates of the Hellespont. My cavalry crushed the satraps of Darius, and I added all Ionia and Aeolia, the two Phrygias and Lydia to your empire….

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Essay

    1756 Words  | 8 Pages

    Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess

    Read More

  • Harriet Tubman Pawn

    498 Words  | 2 Pages

    He had very high standards at a very young age and surpassed those standards instantaneously (“Alexander the Great Biography”). One can infer that many looked up to Alexander and respected him. God believes that everyone is created equal; no matter if one is a slave, or a pawn, or a king, they are all equal in the eyes of God. However, when the time came, both of these people died.

    Read More

  • What Major Issues Did Alexander The Great Face After His Father's

    280 Words  | 2 Pages

    2. What are some of the major issues that Alexander the Great faced when he ascended the throne after his father 's death? How did Alexander handle these issues? Some of the issues Alexander the Great faced when he became a king, was some of the Greek cities did not want him as king and decide to doubt him. He proofed them wrong by setting a harsh example for them, he attacked the accent city of Thebes and then sold more than twenty thousand Thebans to slavery and killed six thousand of them.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Essay

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    The people who were conquered believe that he was brutal and relentless. Based on the information, Alexander was a great military leader and a great king. In the first part of document A, it takes the conquerors perspective of how great Alexander was. It states that he treated some of the rebels with compassion.

    Read More

  • DBQ Essay: How Great Was Alexander The Great?

    781 Words  | 4 Pages

    He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent

    Read More

  • How Great Was Alexander Really Great?

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    He was born in 356 BCE, more than 300 years before Jesus of Nazareth. First Alexander should not be considered great because he killed many innocent people and he had a huge ego and he conquered everything in his way. Document A is an example of this because it talks about his route and how many cities he went through and destroyed everything and everyone in his path. This makes Alexander not great because those people didn't harm or hurt him in any way. He felt like they were in his way and anything in his way is to be destroyed.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Research Paper

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Essay

    343 Words  | 2 Pages

    Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.

    Read More

  • Why Alexander Was Great Dbq

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander was practically unbeatable shown that every war fought resulted in him succeeding and winning over the land. Another piece of evidence is the statistics of his legacy, Alexander’s territory grew to a massive 2,000,000 sq miles. As well as this he was able to take control of this much land in only 11 years (Doc E). He was only around 30 years old when he met his fathers goal of conquering the Persia Empire. Alexander made this achievement look easy when it only took a few conflicts and through this he still care for his soldiers and never put himself first unless he was leading his army into

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq Analysis

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Vs Plutarch Analysis

    1369 Words  | 6 Pages

    He disagreed with the treatment given to the innocent people of the cities he conquered. He regretted being so harsh and became merciful in his campaign. One such example is when he let a woman go free even after she admitted to having killed a soldier and admitting that she herself was the daughter of a man that had once opposed King Philip, fearless of any repercussions that could have come from her confession. Alexander was also kind to the family of Darius with whom he was fighting. He provided them with decent living space during their fight and even let them know that Darius was not truly dead when they grew distraught at the idea

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great A Villain?

    799 Words  | 4 Pages

    So Great “But seen through Persian eyes, Alexander is far from "Great". ” (6-7) Through the eyes of Greeks, he was truly a great man who honored greek culture. But seen through the eyes of a lot of other major cultures and countries, he was a bloodthirsty madman who only had power and control on his

    Read More

  • How Did Alexander The Great A Hero Or A Villain

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, it is my opinion that he is a villain. I believe this because he could be an extremely violent leader and because he never fully reigned over one of the places he conquered/ruled. He is a villain because he murdered thousands of people and soldiers from different nations. Alexander tortured many of his victims and then he killed them.

    Read More

More about Why Alexander The Great Wasn T So Great After All

Open Document