ipl-logo

Why Was Truman's Nuclear Bombings On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified

1754 Words8 Pages

This investigation will answer the following question: “To what extent were Truman’s nuclear bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?” There were two sources that tremendously shaped this essay. The essential secondary source that shaped this essay, was the monograph Why America Dropped The Atomic Bomb written by Ronald Takaki in 1995. Takaki, a post-revisionist historian stated that the purpose for his monograph was to explain the reasons behind Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The origin of the monograph is that, Ronald Takaki being a post-revisionist and a third generation American with Japanese descent had a more open mind. As a matter of fact, he had never been to Japan and had only spoken japanese …show more content…

A group of civilian leaders led by Foreign Minister Togo Shigenori hoped that the Soviet Union might mediate a settlement between the US and Japan since the Soviet Union and Japan had signed a five-year neutrality pact in 1941. Furthermore this could potentially benefit the Soviet Union since it’s in their interest to make sure that “the terms of the settlement were not too favorable towards the United States” (Wilson). However, US generals wouldn’t take the chance that the people in charge [Japanese militarists] would want to end the war peacefully especially since the US were hesitant to trust them since events like Japan’s sneak attack on Pearl Harbor that began the war (Takaki 32-34) and forcing American prisoners of war to walk almost 100 kilometers through the hot jungle with little food and water which resulted in death tolls upwards of 10,000 (Young 26). Furthermore, three highly respected military leaders — Eisenhower, MacArthur, and Leathy all thought that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was not needed militarily (Takaki

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Winning Weapon? By Author Ward Wilson

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    In The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.

    Read More

  • Potsdam Declaration Dbq

    227 Words  | 1 Pages

    As the Japanese forces were considered the aggressors of the conflict by the Allies and Japanese veterans alike, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Their aggression previous to the bombing was demonstrated through the attack on Pearl Harbour, which led to America’s involvement in World War II. The attack was not one born out of vengeance and was not strategically logical, whereas there was a reason behind the bombing of Hiroshima, that reason being that the Japanese military would not agree to the clauses presented in the Potsdam Declaration. This declaration was given to the military officials as an invitation to surrender before the first bombing, providing ample time for them to make a decision to hopefully end the

    Read More

  • Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

    776 Words  | 4 Pages

    By July 1945, it was clear that Japan had been weakened by violent attacks, but there was no indication of any weakening of their determination to fight. In addition, the total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated to be close to 5,000,000 men, which posed an even greater threat to the United States (Blanche M. Touhill, 452). In order to end the war and bring down this large, determined army, the Potsdam Declaration was created. This ultimatum was designed to “spare the Japanese people from utter destruction”, as said by Truman (Kevin B., 605). This rejection shows that the Japanese army and government were aware of the possible dangers of the continuation of war and their choice to decline to surrender.

    Read More

  • Why Is Harry Truman Ultranationalism

    572 Words  | 3 Pages

    Harry Truman evidently demonstrates ultranationalist actions and motives to a moderate extent, accordingly, he is guilty of crimes involving the mistreatment, internment, and use of nuclear warfare against the Japanese peoples. Arguments on whether or not he is an ultranationalist are debatable to a considerable extent. Nevertheless, due to the complexity of the issue, the most reinforced position points to a moderate degree of ultranationalism for various reasons.     Although Harry Truman was responsible for the death of 129 to 246 thousand Japanese civilians as a direct result of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he ultimately prevented further casualties.

    Read More

  • Truman's Decision For The Invasion Of Japan

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    Furthermore, Byrnes and Acheson agreed that the American people would oppose terms that could end the war. The ideas that they had in mind was to retain the emperor of Japan, but others saw its fault. They were afraid that it would invite the Japanese or any other power that the consequence of destruction can open compromises in their favor. It can ultimately prolong the war, which prolongs the death of American soldiers.

    Read More

  • Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay

    694 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hundreds of thousands died, almost half of the population of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The effects were devastating for the slowly dying, and family and friends of the dead. In document “Effects of Atomic Attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki” it shows a burned corpse and miserable doctors. But all would agree that the American government announced the Potsdam Declaration and warned Japan that “prompt and utter destruction” would follow the refusal of surrender. The US also dropped leaflets around the city telling citizens that “So, in accordance with America's humanitarian policies, the American Air Force, which does not wish to injure innocent people, now gives you warning to evacuate the cities named and save your lives.”

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    1761 Words  | 8 Pages

    The background essay states that, “there was reason to believe that the war could be won without either the atomic bomb or a land invasion. This was because an allied naval blockade had already put a stranglehold on Japan. The Japanese people were facing the prospect of slow starvation.” The US military and government “understood that such an invasion might cost hundreds of thousands of lives,” yet they still chose to go through with the bombing. Anteceding this, the US had “cracked Japan’s diplomatic code and learned that the Japanese had approached the Soviet Union to help negotiate surrender.”

    Read More

  • Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

    1394 Words  | 6 Pages

    Walker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.

    Read More

  • Why Was Hiroshima Justified

    1840 Words  | 8 Pages

    the bomb’s code name was “Little Boy”. Three days later, on August 9th, 1945, America dropped another bomb on Nagasaki with the code name “Fat Man”. As many as 200,000 deaths were caused by “Little Boy” alone and many people would die of radiation for years to come. The dropping of the Atom bomb on Hiroshima is an extremely debatable issue with no right or wrong answer. In this essay I will describe both sides to the argument then conclude using my final opinion on whether I am for or against the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima.

    Read More

  • Was Hiroshima Justified Dbq Essay

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kids and others frightened at the sights they saw when the blackness rose, skin burned off, people holding an organ, and many other frightening things. Was the dropping the bomb in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? Do others believe it was a good idea? The correct answer is we don’t know. Just like many other political statements, millions disagree on this topic.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Leo Szilard's Last Resort

    715 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, if Japan was offered the opportunity to surrender and refused, then the decision to use the bomb should be reassessed (Szilard, “A Petition”). “A Petition to the President of the United States” by Leo Szilard provides a strong claim against the use of the atomic bomb supported by establishing credibility,

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb

    630 Words  | 3 Pages

    Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.

    Read More

  • Thesis Statement On The Atomic Bomb

    1523 Words  | 7 Pages

    Thesis statement: Though many speculate that the act of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) while not doing so on Europe (Germany and Italy) was racially motivated, racism played little to no role in these bombings. The United States of America and her allies were willing to end World War II at any cost, had the atomic bombs been available they would have been deployed in Europe. In the 1940’s there is no doubt that the United States of America was engulfed by mass anti-Japanese hysteria which inevitably bled over into America’s foreign policy. During this period Japanese people living in both Japan and the United States of America were seen as less that human.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    863 Words  | 4 Pages

    Theoretically of course, what if a country was to develop a weapon strong enough to completely disintegrate cities and all the people living in it? Coincidently, the United states discovered a bomb that did exactly that and ended up thrusting the world into a new era of weaponized technology towards the end of World War II. Countries from this point on became wary of opposing the United States, aware of the power they possessed, especially since the US had already used this weapon on Japan to end the war.

    Read More

More about Why Was Truman's Nuclear Bombings On Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified

Open Document