ipl-logo

Charles Magel Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

862 Words4 Pages

Charles R. Magel said? Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction. Animals are living creatures that have feelings just like a human being. Animals are not like us on the physical part, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to kill, hurt or even experiment with them. If you ever had a pet or knew someone related to you who had a pet, they’d probably always be talking about how kind, sweet, beautiful, and lovely their animals are. Animal are even used to test products such as Shampoos, …show more content…

Magel said? Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is, "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction. Animals are living creatures that have feelings just like a human being. Animals are not like us on the physical part, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to kill, hurt or even experiment with them. If you ever had a pet or knew someone related to you who had a pet, they’d probably always be talking about how kind, sweet, beautiful, and lovely their animals are. Animal are even used to test products such as Shampoos, perfumes and cosmetics. Those products aren’t like the ones we use, they have different types of chemicals and they try them on the animals to see if it will affect us. Animals testing should not occur because killing an animal is not helping us It’s messing up the world. Animals aren’t something that we could manipulate they are living creatures that have feelings just like us. Humans wouldn’t like to be in cages or laboratories right? Animal testing is cruel because scientists do many horrible tests on the animals. For instance, they leave the animals in cages where they can’t even move their body. The scientists don’t even care if the animal dies. Scientists torture the animals by force feeding, force inhalation and by not feeding the …show more content…

So they believe that is a better benefit to risk an animal life than a human life. The World Medical Association Declare of Helsinki states that human trials should be preceded by tests on animals. But the real truth is that the drugs that they use on the animals aren’t necessary safe for us , for example the 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities. Scientist tries it on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters, but it did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses. In conclusion animals testing should not be done because animals are like human beings, they feel, they live, they eat so why would we want to kill animals for any type of testing when we could try it on a human being that might want to let the scientist try it on them. The animals have the right just like anyone else to have a life, a animal can’t speak, but that doesn’t mean that we could take over that and do whatever we want with them. Animals are like us just and just like them, we would not want to be in a cage dying just to try something that might not even

Show More
Related

  • Inaccurate Animal Testing

    400 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every day, thousands of animals are subjected to cruel, inhumane treatment. In the United States, there are many laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, but one of the most harmful ways of abusing animals is not only legal, but considered by many to be completely justified. The process described is that of animal experimentation, the act of performing experiments on an animal that can deliberately cause the animal suffering and even death. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unnecessary, inaccurate, and cruel to animals. Firstly, animal testing is an inaccurate and outdated means of gathering information.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Beneficial Essay

    574 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animals are subjected to excruciating experiments daily. Countries such as Israel and India have stopped animal testing as well as Britain. “…countless animals are experimented on and then killed…” (Murnaghan 1). Animals are subjected to confined rooms all of their lives, used in painful experiments and then disposed of as if they are an inanimate object.

    Read More

  • Why Animal Experimentation Is Unethical

    1066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

    Read More

  • The Ethicality Of Animal Experimentation

    1144 Words  | 5 Pages

    Many of the concerns of the ethicality of animal experimentation is understood by the people who still believe animal testing is necessary. Many regulations are enforced on animal studies in an attempt to make them as moral as possible. Additionally, there are also campaigns that advocate the regulation on animal testing “ which advocates the search (1) for the replacement of animals with non-living models; (2) reduction in the use of animals; and (3) refinement of animal use practices “ (Hajar 7). They understand the upset at the idea of animal testing, and they want to appease the masses by keeping the testing as humane as it can possibly be. Even with all of the outcry, there is a large group of people that see animal experimentation as a necessary evil.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II. So whether animals are like humans or not?

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech Animal Testing

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Since the value of animal life as a living being should be recognized and to a certain extent equated to the value of human life, the animal experiments raise a range of ethical questions (Armstrong & Botzler,

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong

    1111 Words  | 5 Pages

    Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

    Read More

  • How To Ban Animal Testing Persuasive Essay

    499 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing has been an ongoing debate for hundreds of years. I have done research on the benefits and withdrawals of animal testing. What you guys may believe is right might be different than the person sitting next to you. I will be talking about the failures of testing, he benefits, and what supporters and opponents say about whether or not animals have the same rights as humans. There has been many failures of animal testing.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Illegal Essay

    864 Words  | 4 Pages

    We wouldn’t subject our pets to burning, starving, and isolation, so why is it okay to subject other animals to this cruel treatment? Animal testing is harmful not only because it is unsafe, but because it poses a question of moral judgement. Testing on animals should be illegal because it is unethical, drugs that pass animal tests are not necessarily safe, and many animals lack the protection required for their safety. ​ Many people are unaware of the torture animals in labs must endure when being tested on.

    Read More

  • What Is Animal Testing Unethical

    193 Words  | 1 Pages

    Which is why animal testing violates “Direct but Unequal Theory” which simply means a beings can experience some forms of emotions, because they are capable and aware of their emotions they are in titled to be treated in a human manner! This particular theory also states “I am not permitted to harm animals without good reason; however,

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Flaws

    1714 Words  | 7 Pages

    Animal experimentation is a very noteworthy subject that has created quite a stir amongst the world. Anything from monkeys becoming anemic due to starvation to puppies with open sores from a new topical cream to relieve itching; animal experimentation is something that has been around since 129 AD. Testing human diseases or medicines on animals is factually not accurate, considering that there are so many differences between a human and a non-human animal. According to PETA, ASPCA, The Humane Society, and the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, they explain that animal experimentation can be avoided and is an unnecessary step in today’s testing. Most humans typically care for non-human animals and take

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Wrong Essay

    1444 Words  | 6 Pages

    Animal rights are violated when they are being poisoned and poked while being tested on by scientists, all for the safety of cosmetics, even if it requires the loss of several animals losses. Since animals have similar, if not exact, responses and characteristics to humans, causing pain and suffering to animals is parallel to causing pain to humans. Because of this correlation, animal testers are accused of dehumanization, according to the BBC. When animals are used for the benefit of humans, their right to decent treatment is violated. Animals have the right always to be given dignity and respect, just as people are given dignity and respect.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

    744 Words  | 3 Pages

    Drugs in particular can carry significant dangers with their use but animal testing allows researchers to initially gauge the safety of drugs prior to commencing trials on humans. This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved”(Murnaghan). Analyzing the text above it has a clear claim which is true it may save lives and all these good things but as mentioned before most of the experiments done don’t get used which makes the animal's death be in vain the researchers might just see it as any other death but animals matter and don't deserve to die being tested on something that will never be

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Is Inhumane Essay

    431 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal Testing is Inhumane. Multiple species are dying by normal nature happenings, such as being eaten or something like that. However, that 's just the life cycle. But even with this ongoing cycle, the deaths that happen in it don 't get anywhere close to the amount of animals killed by us humans. Each year, 100 million animals, including mice, rats, dogs, frogs, cats, and more, are all killed for scientific usage.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Banned

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are living in the 21st and it is for sure that subjecting animals to painful testing and experiments is no longer needed since we have alternatives such as bio-engineering and computer modeling which prove to be quite successful. In my opinion since we proclaim to be the smartest species on the Earth, capable of thinking and making choices, we should think and make the right choice about animal testing, it should be banned because animals even if they cannot talk for themselves, deserve the right of living a life without fear and pain. The results of this testing will never be enough accurate and even if it is animals are capable of feeling and you would not want to feel the pain that they are feeling, is that right? So, why are we willing to sentence them to that pain?

    Read More

More about Charles Magel Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document