Persuasive Essay On Why Books Should Not Be Banned

Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.

This piece of literature is merely depicting history as accurate as it can be. Although people regard this book as inappropriate for the younger audiences, this book just wasn’t meant for kids, but more towards the young adults who are more mature that can truly understand the messages and teachings given by Twain on humanity in the 1840s. The audience should strongly be against the republishing of this book and truly try to intake Twain’s teachings and lessons that are included within the development of the characters and

Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.

Elie Wiesel’s Night should not be banned from the book list for ninth grade because it is a book that teaches very important lessons despite the fact that it contains violent scenes. The book shows that we should treat people in a good way even if they are not like us. It reveals the horrible consequences of inhumanity, the meaningless suffering and unbearable pain of innocent people. These reasons show that the book is very important for the grown-ups because it deals with fundamental questions about humanity and moral values.

Also books should not be banned so everyone can gain knowledgeable history of the world. Some people believe books should not be banned because it’s taking away our rights as human beings, limits knowledge and takes away our upper hand on history. To begin, books should not be banned from libraries, schools or in the United States because

Just because history is harsh and not always the most pleasant thing to learn about, does not mean that we can ignore it. Kenya Down with PBS said, “Being uncomfortable with history is not means to change it; people need to figure out how to confront issues.” Down also mentioned how Lee’s book is one of the most banned books

Books should not be censored for children and young adults because in reality, life is not censored. One specific book that should not be censored, or challenged, is The Color Purple by Alice Walker. It is challenged for exposing the gruesome truth of racism and abuse along with the use of profane language. Although these elements these elements are not positive topics, they are necessary to depict the reality of life in the early 1900s. The Color Purple teaches the reality about the mistreatment of African-Americans

If you want a book not to be read by an adolescent, banning the book will often have an opposite effect. Although it contains sensitive topics and harsh language, The Secret Life of Bees should not be banned in high schools because

What we need is a good official who institutes a reasonable law. Confucius’ idea of a good official should also be attained. Education is not enough for them to say that they are worthy to be a good official. They might have attained the knowledge but they were not able to meet the morals and values that they should also have. They should have both knowledge and

The labeling of the novel as racist is both a misunderstanding and deviation from the truth. The academic field is the most vocal in the quest to ban the book and save children from perceived moral deterioration. This hurdle is overcome by the fact that the book is only meant for adults. Furthermore, the proposition of inappropriateness of words such as nigger and Injun as used in the book is not enough to discredit the positives of the book and are therefore insignificant. Therefore, I propose on readers to focus on the greater good of the book and bypass the insignificant orientation of the language by aligning with the fact that the language is a construct of the 19th century Missouri

Even though it censors inappropriate material that influences impressionable minds, we should not ban books books because it filters realism and limits our ability for an open mind. It would deprive students of an education about the world around them. Banning books would completely get rid of our freedom of expression and it would restrain our usually infinite imagination. If we allow for books to be banned, it would limit our ability to have imagination and have an open mind about the world around us.

Censorship The United States Government is finding new ways to censor citizen’s freedom. Are they taking it too far by removing online content and books that might be considered offensive to the general public. The government should not take away offensive reading content for three reasons. Firstly all citizens should not be limited to what books they are allowed to read considering we have been granted freedom from the government with the first Amendment. Secondly, books are people’s best teachers and provide real life knowledge for kids and adults who are trying to comprehend subjects that we not taught throughout the many years of education.

The book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury shows censorship throughout the book to keep citizens in the dark about matters they should know about. The government does not want their citizens to know the reality around them. The reason given for censorship is to ensure the happiness of their citizens. Anything involving poems, stories or any piece of literature is prohibited. The idea is that people won’t be able to get ideas of revolting, personal opinions that are debatable and prevent knowledge spreading about what’s going on in there reality.

The memorization of every single book and every single chapter for the passing down for future generations would be a strenuous task. If I had to pick a single book in which to spend my time learning, I would pick the book of Psalms. Psalms is probably the most figurative of all the books, but I find that it has the most enriching material. Each Psalm is its own advice to Christians, I would

There 's no reason to change if I do that. " Montag does not want to change to become equal to the rest of the people. He would rather keep breaking the law by hiding books so that way he could be different.