The actions of these bullies are too severe to not be dealt and prosecuted in court. An example of why bullies should be prosecuted in court is, the victim 's best chance of finding relief and be put at ease is to bring a private suit against the bully. The bully has violated many laws and social media agreements, stalking laws. But the private lawsuit does not give total esurance of relief for the victim because bullying is not against the law. Therefore making bullying illegal is the proper solution (Manuel).
There is no doubt that anyone who breaks the law deserves to be punished accordingly. The punishment does not necessarily need to be a prison sentence; it could be community service, hard labor, or a heavy fine. However, there should be some variation of punishment because if there is no reinforcement it sends a message. This message is what the public society receives from celebrities convicted in the news. The message relays that breaking the law is acceptable and will not hold an individual accountable.
The deterrence theory of punishment justifies punishment as a necessary measure to prevent people from committing crimes. It deters previous offenders and those who have not committed a crime and are contemplating committing crimes. The punishment should be sufficient so that people choose not to commit the crime rather than being punished. Laws are intended to maximise happiness in the society. However, because crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, they should be kept to a minimum.
Devlin would have thought the act of polyandry to be immoral and disintegrates the society however, being a moderate moralism he would not have wanted to intervene with the privacy of other unless the act has become very widely practiced and start causing harm to the society. However, if the was a law to be passed to make polyandry legal, Devlin would have disagree with this because once it has been made legal it will drive and encourage many to conduct this immoral act. Devlin did not say that every immoral act is to be prohibited. Devlin used the jury box morality of average right minded citizens where moral standards of behaviour are the standards of behaviour of a reasonable man. Will a reasonable man think the act of polyandry as something good and to be done?
Which most of the song now a days got curses. As censorship in books, plays, and movies may affect the overall feeling and meaning of the writing but people should have the freedom of speech to express their self through many ways. While censorship is needed to ensure social media, it also negates freedom of speech. People should be allowed to convey themselves and say what they feel or believe without being restricted. But freedom of speech does not mean that you can say absolutely anything it comes with responsibility and therefore people should ensure they don’t offend
It is an invitation to deceive and impede ourselves, to follow false reasoning and toddlers, insisting that the addicts should die, insisting that they do not need a thorough process because they have just started things that should not be. That if the killings of "drug users and drug pusher" will certainly be addressed by mercenary police and abusive guards. With the mistakes and the burdens of the lives of those who are just bad, it's okay because, the "war on drugs" that the president will enforce is good but the truth is that we just believe that people who are guilty will never change, those people with bad consciences do not need to
It also creates bad self-image and feelings of guilt that can haunt persons throughout their lives. Pornography and hate speech, he claims, cause nowhere near as much harm as political and religious speech. His conclusion is that we do not want to ban these forms of speech and the harm principle, therefore, casts its net too far. Kateb 's solution is to abandon the principle in favor of almost unlimited
Lack of attention from friends, parents/teachers can make a person create rumors or a bully, just to feel popular, seem tough/cool or in charge. Some children even teens have learned to bully from others, such as parents, brothers/sisters, or friends. People have seen others getting in someone 's way by being angry or pushing other people around. They believe that by putting someone in fear, they will have the best shot at everything. However, some people also do that because they are victims themselves due to a bad upbringing because home can make people insensitive to other people 's feelings and emotions.
The central idea behind Jean Hampton's Moral Education Theory of Punishment (MET) is that it is best to educate criminals on their wrongdoings without handing down any physical punishments or ramifications. Hampton believes that excessive harm is not a moral response to a crime committed by a person. Rather, she argues that the point of basic punishment is to teach the wrongdoer that the action they did or wanted to do is forbidden, on the basis that it is morally wrong according to society. Therefore, according to Hampton, it is much healthier to educate criminals rather than handing down difficult physical punishments, which simply hurts the criminal and can be unproductive. To elaborate, Hampton proposes that any form of punishment is justified
Freedom of speech is indeed a basic human right, but does protecting free speech includes hate speech? Having the freedom to say anything causes the possibility of offending or harming certain groups. Consequently, protecting free speech at all costs might result in the instability of the country. Therefore, I disagree with the statement made that freedom of speech should be protected at all cost. Why is freedom of speech so important?