How Did Communism Fail

During the industrial revolution Laissez-faire was a thing, but it was very controversial. Business owners were for Laissez-faire, because it benefited them more than it benefited the workers. Business owners made so much more money without the overhead over them. The absence of overhead is the main reason most business owners were for laissez-faire. Laissez-faire prevented the business owners from having to present workers with safe working conditions, this also led to spending less money which meant making more.

Socialism, unlike capitalism, does not support the free market and supports the idea of the means of production being controlled by the government. Because the exchange of goods is restricted by the government, the natural forces of supply and demand are suppressed, meaning the economy is less capable of growing. Socialism, however, is less extreme than communism, allowing for people to own their own property and have a little variation in wealth. This is slightly better because the government does not have total control over the people, and people still have a slight incentive to earn more money. But, often people rely on the heavy intervention from the government to get aid and are not as productive as they would be in a capitalist society.

At the turn of the nineteenth century many problems faced the American bourgeoisie. The cause of many of these problems was the laissez faire economic policy of the Unites States during this time, this meant that Business owners operated without any restriction from the government. Since they had no restrictions business owners made decisions based completely on what would be cheapest and make them the most money. As a result of this unethical situations developed in the workplace. These situations included child labor, unsafe working conditions and unclean food production.

Women’s rights weren’t as equal as men, I think they got off pretty easy on a lot of things. As far as a man providing or trying to make a living they had to be very efficient. Lack of productivity could lead to a loss of civilization, personal goods and even death. Honesty was also a major key, accusing a man of a crime but not providing the right evidence could lead to the death. In my opinion one of the biggest disadvantages was there was no alternative options such as jail time for any wrongful actions committed.

In short, yes, they do. The reason jury consultants ostensibly pervert the judicial system is that it eradicates the principle of fairness. “Very few trial consultants can come in and do any meaningful work for less than $50,000 to $100,000" (Strier 105). Because of the escalating costs, this makes the use of jury consultants will not benefit the indigent citizens. Moreover, the affluent individuals will find the expenditure beneficial as well as corporations and possibly the government in some instances.

Marx would see these inequality as inherently unfair, and only exists because the bourgeoisie control the political, economic and social resources while the proletariat do all the hard labor. Functionalism does not encourage people to take an active role in changing their social environment, even when such change may benefit them. Instead, functionalism sees active social change as undesirable because the various parts of society will compensate in a seemingly natural way for any problems that may arise.The data in the second table shows the top five reasons the population do not have health care coverage. 30% of the highest percentage of people did not have healthcare coverage because they couldn 't afford premiums. 1% of the lowest percentage of people did not have healthcare coverage because they 're healthy so they don 't need insurance.

Legalism is a very strict and harsh philosophy, yet they have a good economy. Furthermore, Legalism rewards you if you do as you’re told, but if you do an incorrect action you are punished. Daoism people lived simple lives, therefore, there was no competition, but there was also no wealth or power. Though they live simple lives, Daoism has too much good will; inability to fight.

Communism Isn 't always good, but it isn 't always bad either. Sure Stalin did kill millions of people but it gave the survivors better lives. I believe communism could change our nation for the better and should be instilled in the US instead of having Capitalism. In communism, money isn 't a factor to wealth because there isn 't any money “The Advantages of Communism are There is no gap between rich and poor” (Rud). Communism is a form of government in which the society wants a strong powerful leader to rise up and make decisions for them so they can worry about themselves: This is known as a Communist Dictatorship like they had in the USSR.

The reason why many Americans refuse to take these jobs is that they are low paying and tedious. They would rather do minimal amounts of work for higher pay in the comfort of an office space rather than pick fruits, packaging food, or work at a steel mill. To quote Dwoskins article “Why Americans Won 't do Dirty Jobs,” Dwoskin states “Americans won’t fill them, thus, Americans are too soft.” This may not be entirely true, but according to unemployment rates and desperate employers, it might

The great demand for cotton forces workers to continue using these dangerous pesticides. Individuals need the money so badly that they are willing to risk their health to work. The authorities do not enforce the rules for protective clothing with pesticide use. When European countries continue to do business with companies that are not following safety protocols, they are supporting the idea of unsafe work environments. Powerful companies take advantage of the lack of laws and regulations to produce products at lower costs in other countries.