ipl-logo

Why Did Rome Succeed In Controlling The Roman Empire

530 Words3 Pages

The Roman empire controlled its people and land but, the Han controlled its people and land more effectively. Of course, Rome could have succeeded in controlling its empire but, by looking at the political, technological, and social aspects, it is clear that the Han left a larger impact to the world and revolutionized life by exercising more effective control overall. The Han controlled its people and territory more harshly than the Romans. Although they were harsher, they also worked more efficiently and took initiative. They generated new order and collected more taxes to support the military and government. By doing that, they had the resources they needed for everyday The military helped protect those items along with the Han people. Rome on the other hand, controlled its empire differently. What the Romans did was have the senate run the government and have geographical features distinguish boundaries. Clearly, the Roman's actions were not as effective as the Han's so, basically, the Han had to control its empire politically in some way and, they acted on that well. …show more content…

To start off, Rome did not succeed in controlling its empire through technology. They managed to develop trading skills but overall, they were far less developed than other countries. Especially when comparing the Romans and the Han, it is clear who achieved more. Again, Rome developed trading and other simple skills. While they were busy doing that, the Han people were inventing paper. From then on, that invention was used every day and “revolutionized Chinese life” (Han Cornell Notes). Not only that but, the Han also used their resources to their advantage and used collar harnesses, plows, and wheelbarrows to help improve farming. All in all, the Han used technology to control its empire

Show More
Related

  • Unit 7 Han Dynasty

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    Unit 7 is a rather long section covering both Rome and China 's powerful and expansive empires during the time period 300 BCE - 300 CE. The Han Dynasty and Imperial Rome were very similar in their unprecedented scale and duration. Although they did operate in differing ways, for example, Rome relied on slaves to expand its workforce, while the Chinese 's economy lived off of free peasant farmers. The Chinese benefited from having an overwhelming population that would benefit the bureaucracy and supply political stability for the Hans. When it came to the Roman Empire, religion did not have the same impact that Confucianism had on the dynasties in China.

    Read More

  • How Did The Han Dynasty Build The Western Roman Empire

    569 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another similarity that they had were taxation problems. Difference that they had was, religion. Those two similarities and one difference that these empires had were a big part of why they fell. Barbarian tribes had put up with the Western Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty long enough. The Western Roman empire had the best army, they were the strongest.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Han And Roman Empires

    322 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Han and the roman empires shared similar interests and attitudes towards technology. Technology became a primary focuses for the civilizations. The Han and Roman made the same amount of attention towards technology. They both found it important to be the most advanced in technology. In Documents 3 and 4 both empires had a positive attitude towards technology and both thought it was a gift from the “gods”.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Han And Roman Empires

    412 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were prominent globalizing empires that created lasting legacies for many years to come. The empires were able to do what most have failed to do previously. They were both able to successfully incorporate their enemies and neighbors into their realms. In doing so, they were able to amass a population of about 60 million. Even though both empires had many things in common, they exhibited some key distinguishing differences.

    Read More

  • Dbq Han Dynasty

    1061 Words  | 5 Pages

    For decades people have been wondering if the Han dynasty was effective or not. The Han dynasty was the dynasty after the Qin dynasty. Unlike the Qin dynasty that only ruled a short time of fourteen years, the Han dynasty ruled over four hundred years. So with the evidence that I have read, I believe that the Han dynasty was an effective government for a number of reasons.

    Read More

  • Fall Of The Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    After all of these diseases struck the empire it was very difficult to find soldiers fit for battle. This led to Roman military officials recruiting Germanic soldiers to defend Rome. Since the Roman Empire needed to pay for its troops it also needed the money to do this. The empire decided to increase

    Read More

  • Fall Of Rome Research Paper

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both had social unrest and internal decay. China and Rome both had their bureaucrats assassinated. They received no taxes from their landowners and eventually their landowners formed private armies. To some extent religion also broken up the Han dynasty and Rome. Christianity began to spread in Rome drastically and eventually fracturing the empire.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ottoman And Ming Empires

    312 Words  | 2 Pages

    In final analysis, the Ming Dynasty and the Ottoman Empire were great empires while they lasted. Their leaders had a lot to do with their success. The order in their economic and political structure was crucial to maintaining their empires. Their history will always have an effect on the modern day continents of Asia, Europe and

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Han China And Rome

    952 Words  | 4 Pages

    All these reforms helped consolidate power in Rome while also allowing them to expand their reach beyond its borders. In comparison, the Han dynasty's decentralized approach meant that there was less uniformity in terms of administration due to varying degrees of autonomy among local rulers causing confusion at times when dealing with certain matters like taxation or foreign policy making it difficult for them to establish more powerful overseas presence compared with Rome during this period

    Read More

  • Roman Attitude Towards Technology Dbq

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    China’s Han dynasty and the Romans valued technology in their civilizations, but they used technology for different reasons to accommodate their empire. The Hans relied heavily on agriculture and developed technology to make labor easier and more efficient, which is depicted by some of their technology like iron metallurgy and water systems. In contrast, the Romans focused primarily on science and mathematics, so the intellectuals looked down on technology as it was used by slaves and for their labor. Han China’s attitude towards technology was more appreciative and focused on its benefits toward labor than the Romans who viewed technology as inferior and for the laborers in their class-divided society. All the documents written by the Han,

    Read More

  • Rome And Han China Comparative Essay

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    China on the other hand had more problems in its bureaucracy and civic unrest. For example, some peasants who had lost their farms had to sell their children into service. A third difference is that as previously stated, China had a successful revival while Rome did not. Rome divided and the Western half survived but was diminished by attempts to regulate the economy and decline tax revenue ’s.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Qin Dynasty And Han Dynasty

    1233 Words  | 5 Pages

    China, up until the Qin Dynasty, consisted of independent states controlled by kings fighting each other for land and power. This time period was called The Era of Warring States, which lasted two hundred years. After this time, the Qin Dynasty rose to power. They conquered all other dynasties, and established a centralized government, unifying China for the first time. The dynasty that succeeded the Qin, the Han, continued the centralized government and they started a westward expansion that would encourage trade and cultural diffusion.

    Read More

  • Similarities And Differences Between Imperial Rome And Han China

    708 Words  | 3 Pages

    In various ways, Han China and Imperial Rome were politically similar yet also had their pair of differences. Two very well-known classical empires, both had highly advanced political systems for their time; Han China, lasted from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, and Imperial Rome, lasted from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Many think these two empires where built with no previous influence, however; the Roman Empire had retained many aspects from the Roman Republic, and Han China from the Qin Dynasty. During their peaks, they controlled the majority of the world 's population because of their constant expansion of conquered lands, while their structure of administration and rule influenced many empires and future societies around the world. Aspects such as these, ultimately, led these two empires to be, arguably, the most influential societies in the world; as their legacies still live on today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Fall Of The Han And Roman Empires

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The Roman Empire And The Han Dynasty

    1525 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

    Read More

More about Why Did Rome Succeed In Controlling The Roman Empire

Open Document