Not even one manuscript written by his hand exists. Information on his background is limited and shady. For someone who we presume to be the most prominent author of all time, there should be cold hard evidence that he wrote the plays and poems himself. However it is extremely difficult to believe that Shakespeare wrote his own literature. I believe that the conspiracy is true, Shakespeare did not write his own plays and poems. How could someone write such powerful, brilliant texts with such insubstantial education? Geniuses do exist, but this man supposedly wrote some of the most complex, well-known pieces of literature known in history. Apparently he went to the local grammar school, King Edward VI Grammar School Stratford-upon-Avon, even though there aren't even any physical records saying so and was only in school until he was 14 years old. He didn't even attend college! It …show more content…
According to nosweatshakespeare.com, one of the first candidates is Sir Francis Bacon. He was an essayist, writer, and scientist who many believe wrote Shakespeare's literature. Suspicions arose from the fact that Bacon's Grand Tour brought him to some of the locations in which Shakespeare's plays took place and that some of the plays contained scientific understanding that only Bacon would be able to comprehend. Those who believe that Shakespeare did write his own plays and poems might argue that there isn't actual proof that someone else wrote them.However there isn't any proof that he did either. TIME states, " The Anti-Stratfordians point out that nobody even knows if that's how Shakespeare spelled his name: the only surviving examples of his handwriting are six scraggly signatures spelled several different ways." It cannot be proven that he wrote the texts when we don't even have a single, uniform signature or record showing that he
There are many reasons that prove William Shakespeare’s claimed authorship was authentic. William Shakespeare was a poet born on the 23rd of April in 1564. He was born into Stratford-Upon-Avon. (Shmoop Editorial Team) If you’ve ever read any of Shakespeare’s plays, they’re all quite well written, including proper grammar, metaphorical phrases, and many other good writing techniques any good writer may know and see frequently in other English pieces.
William Shakespeare’s works are some of the most famous throughout the world, in both history and in the modern era. However, Shakespeare may not have written the entirety of his pieces. In his play Macbeth, there is evidence that Shakespeare may have had his works altered after his original publication, perhaps due to the passage of time and the countless individual interpretations of the play. Most recently, experts have criticized Act 3 Scene 5 and Act 4 Scene 1 for not being authored by Shakespeare. However, they are only slightly correct in that Act 3 Scene 5 may not have been penned by Shakespeare.
Edward de Vere: The True Author Imagine if William Shakespeare, one of the most praised English writer, was actually a fraud. There has been a question going around whether Shakespeare, supposed author of works such as Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet, was the true author of the works attributed to his name. From Shakespeare’s lack of education, traveling, and manuscripts; there have been many suspects as to who the true author may be, but the most convincing arguments that have been made have put Edward de Vere, also known as the 17th Earl of Oxford, as the most convincing candidate. There have been arguments made such as his great knowledge, the markings in his bible, the correlation between his life and that of the character Hamlet, and so on.
We must acknowledge the arguments that is typically used against this playwright. The First comes in the form of burden of proof. According to William Causey, “the Oxfordian’s should have the burden of producing the evidence and the burden of persuading the audience in the authorship debate of the strength of the evidence”. He expands on the idea of persuading the audience with authorship by stating that a “standard of beyond a reasonable doubt should be used in resolving the Shakespeare authorship debate” (Causey, 102). After the establishment of proof has been made.
William Shakespeare is easily the most influential writer throughout English history. Shakespeare was born in 1564, his father was a successful glove-maker. They were from Stratford-upon-Avon in England. Other than attending grammar school, Shakespeare otherwise had no other formal education. He soon got married, had three children, and ultimately left to pursue a career in London as a playwright and actor.
William Shakespeare, a country bumpkin from Stratford-upon-Avon would simply have been unequipped to write about such things” (Jamieson 1).This proves that De Vere was certainly knowledged on the information that would be needed to write the works attributed to Shakespeare. This also shows that Shakespeare was not qualified being that he was a “bumpkin,” or an unsophisticated person from the countryside. Sure anyone would be able to write, but using the immense amount of detail that was used in these writings would need someone very qualified to write them. In another article, called “De Vere Authorship Argument”, it says that Edward De Vere could fit the role of Shakespeare being that “He is known to have graduated Cambridge University at age 14, becoming master of arts at age of 16.” It also states that “account books clearly showed that Edward De Vere had an extensive library underlining his qualifications to write as knowledgeably as Shakespeare”
It has been agreed upon between both sides that the Shakespeare of Stratford went to grammar school- the equivalent of elementary school if you live in America- but that is where the disagreements start. According to Simon Schama, Stratfordians believe that Shakespeare possessed the capability to write his extraordinary plays because he studied works of classic literature written by authors such as Cicero, Virgil, and Plutarch. Since Stratfordians believe that ”most of his plays were adapted from earlier works,” he could have been creative enough to write all of the works in his name (Farouky, 2). On the other hand, the Anti-Stratfordians say that there is no proof that the Shakespeare of Stratford was even literate, as there are only 6 surviving copies of signature, all of which are almost illegible (Shakespeare Oxford Fellowship,1). Some of these signatures are even spelled differently than the rest.
The well-known William Shakespeare wrote many prominent plays and sonnets that lead him to be one of the greatest writers. As a youth, he grew up in Stratford and learned to speak and write Greek and Latin. Then, after having twins, he left his home town, and pursued his writing career. His 37 plays and over 150 sonnets soon became top hits throughout the world. However, is Shakespeare himself the one to take credit for these famous plays?
Although, it is unclear how Shakespeare’s career in theatre got started, there is proof that in roughly 1594 he became a member of King Chamberlain’s Men (who later changed their name to the King’s Men), an acting company who produced many of Shakespeare’s plays. Several years after he died in 1616, collegues of Shakespeare, John Heminge and Henry Condell, assembled a collected edition of Shakespeare’s plays, and in 1623 appeared as Mr. William Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies. Heminge and Condell, as well as contemporaries Ben Jonson and Leonard Digges, make testimonies to Shakespeare and his writings. Indeed, little documentary evidence has been found to support the idea that Shakespeare was a writer, there is additionally
Shakespeare is the famous author of many different plays and poems. He began his writing in the 1500’s, and moved on to theatrical work as well. According to Barnet, “ eighteen of his plays were published during his lifetime.” ( Barnet).
Also Archaeologist found out that the bodies were man and woman from the Neolithic period. Last, Shakespeare only wrote the story so that could get people's attention and make them buy the book, just so that he could be rich with money. When Shakespeare got popular with his writing and career he got to hang out with King James and Queen Elizabeth. Some say that most of Shakespeare's play were written by other people by Francis bacon and Earl of Oxford.
Could a common folk be capable of writing some of the world's best plays? William Shakespeare was a commoner who couldn’t write. In one document you can see six of his signatures, they were all drastically different. William Shakespeare the writer, could be a pseudonym for various people. It is highly unlikely for someone that couldn’t sign their name, to write some of the best plays in the world.
No one will really know other than him. All there is to do is to base the answer on what is seen, read, or heard. Shakespeare is world known as the best playwrighter of all history. How did just writing plays make him so famous and how is he kept alive to this very day? Well, in his plays he used beautiful poetry that people during that time loved and
Marafuga 1 Fact or Fake Throughout the ages of literature there has been a question whether William Shakespeare wrote his plays or not. Many authors and poets as well as critics have spoken out about this issue. Often times it is varied to both sides whether he wrote his plays or not. This is an issue attempted to be made clear with much research.
William Shakespeare was a very influential writer during the time period of 1500's-1600's. Shakespeare published many great plays that people still read and act out today. He had a very different style of writing, he used 'blank verse' when he wrote his plays, a metrical pattern consisting of lines of unrhymed iambic pentameter. One of the plays this amazing writer publushed is a very well known play called Julius Caesar.