cember 2015 The causes of the Civil War can be examined from countless angles, depending on the historian. Michael F. Holt and Bruce Levine are two historians that examine the causes of the civil war from two different perspectives. Holt is more concerned with the growing political sectionalism that causes the Civil War, while Levine argues that the economic divisions between the North and the South contributes a lot to the birth of the Civil War. Each argument is well thought out, historically accurate, and provides the reader with new perspective on the causes of the Civil War. In Levine’s article, “The Economic Divisions That Contributed to the Civil War”, he claims that in order to answer the questions of the Civil War, it must be examined
The Civil is a war between two territories or more, the North and South in this case, were the two territories to fight for one goal. North wanted to abolish slavery, and the South wanted to keep it. War didn’t start from one man hitting another, in fact the war had a cause to it. The Southern people were worried about the North establishing a new nation. Meaning to vote for a new president.
Their differences about many topics, is what resulted in the Civil War. Slavery was one of the main factors as to why the states started to secede from the union. As the states started to secede, the complications of the union started. Burn used the context of the cause of the Civil War well. There are many events that led up to the war, Burn
It was the infringement on states’ rights and collapse of the two party system, that made the disagreements between the North and the South nearly impossible to solve and made the Civil war inevitable. When America was establishing itself into a country, slavery was a debated topic; even though the founding fathers wanted to abolish
Southern Slave States feared an increase in Free States in the North, so with the implementation of the Missouri Compromise, they felt slightly more secure in their position in the Union. Henry Clay’s compromise forbade slavery north of the 36th parallel, which added security to the North as well, yet it was eventually deemed unconstitutional in the Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sandford. It was replaced by the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act with the execution of a policy known as popular sovereignty, which essentially allows the citizens of an area to determine whether they would allow slavery in that specific area. Nevertheless, neither the Missouri Compromise nor the Kansas-Nebraska Act impacted the South’s decision to secede like the Compromise of 1850. Though it was meant to benefit the South through strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act,
The initial causes of the outbreak of the Civil War: The Civil War began after the Ordinance of Secession in South Carolina on Dec. 20, 1860. Southerners clung to slavery since it was responsible for the production and wealth of their economy. The North declared slavery "the great moral, social, and political evil of the day." The North’s Republican presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln winning the election in 1860 directly caused the ensuing secession of South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas—even before Lincoln took office. On April 12, 1861, the bombardment at the Battle of Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor, South Carolina and its surrender by Brig.
Lower and South and Upper South had to go to war to decide whether what side to pick. The Deep South was slave based agriculture and the Upper south had a variety of economy. Abraham Lincoln and John Crittenden did not want this circumstance to progress in a negative way. “The Crittenden Compromise proved unworkable. Secessionists in the Deep South had no interest in returning to
During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln illustrated cautiousness as several States that was part of the Union were undecided whether to join the Confederate government or remain in the Union. However, Lincoln was aware of the pressure that he was facing and therefore, Lincoln, did not overuse his authority that would illustrate himself as a tyrant. However, authorized the suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus in 1861, which was not one of the greatest moments of his time; nevertheless, what showed of Lincoln was commitment and a sense of leadership within the line of the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln dislike of slavery was apparent from the beginning of 1850; however, he did not want the Civil War to be about slavery and was cautious not talking about slavery at the beginning of the war. Despite his avoidance of the issue slavery during the war, Republican radicals pressured Lincoln implemented the first Confiscation Act of 1861 in which slaves captured by the Union forces were not to be returned to the master since there was no contraband.
When the tension was at its highest, the north would attack the south verbally and call slavery Sothern slavery. There was slavery in the north at one part, but the north othered themselves form slavery because they addressed slavery as a problem of the south. Lincoln did not want to further push the divide between the north and the south, so he never wanted to refer to slavery as Southern slavery. This is an example of Lincoln accommodating both sides. When Lincoln referred to slavery as American slavery, he was addressing slavery as being an American problem.
The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to ban slavery in the territories that had not yet become states. When Lincoln won election in 1860 as the first Republican president, as he promised to keep slavery out of territories, 7 slave states in the South seceded and formed a new nation since they feared Northerners becoming more powerful under Lincoln; instead, they chose Jefferson Davis as their own President. One of the major causes that led the Americans into the Civil War was caused by slavery. While both Northerners and Southerners believed they fought against despotism and persecution, Northerners focused on the oppression
The causes of the war can be traced to the roots of our political fabric, in the complexity of mankind, in the fundamental law, in the Constitution itself, and in the institution of slavery which it recognized and ironically intended to protect. When the constitution was adopted, and the union formed, there was the presence of slavery in virtually all the states. Due to the industrialism of the North, slavery wasn’t really of a significant importance to them. While, the southerners were using slavery to benefit them in terms of farming, they didn’t want slavery to be
There are many factors that led up to the American Civil War. One of the main causes was the conflict that arose from the North and South’s opposing views of slavery. In Abraham Lincoln’s “A House Divided” speech he said, “In my opinion, [slavery] will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed. ‘A house divided against itself cannot stand’” (A House Divided 511). This quote was a prediction and antecedent to what would later be known in history as the American Civil War.
The Civil War occurred because the North and the South had opposing viewpoints over the topic of slavery, resulting in sectionalism and/or violence, as shown by the secession of the Southern states, consequences of the Kansas Nebraska Act, and the reactions after the Fugitive Slave Law was passed. Before the Civil War, the nation was divided between two powerful regions, the North and South. The North and the South disagreed about many issues involving state rights, tariffs, and most importantly, the issue of slavery, which was legal in the South, but not the North. As the United States gained new territory, huge debates erupted over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the area. Southerners feared that
Even though the South was a part of the Union, and was bound by a contract, the South had every right to secede from the Union. Many states of the North has broken the Constitution, therefore the agreement that keeps the Southern states from seceding is broken. The North has also gained overwhelming power over the South in Congress, therefore the Southern states are not equally represented in the Union anymore. According to the tenth Amendment, the rights that are not listed in the Constitution are reserved for the states, and the right to secede is not in the Constitution. Therefore the Southern states should have been allowed to secede from the union as the government of the Union did not protect some of their given rights.
The Battle of Antietam is significant to the overall Civil War history as it marks what most historians highlight as the turning point of the war. General Lee would eventually retreat, but many historians still argue that this was a stalemate with no clear victor. The Battle of Antietam is also significant as it sheds light on the weaknesses of General McClellan to President Abraham Lincoln. e. Battle of Gettysburg i. The Battle of Gettysburg is the most prominent and widely discussed battle in the Civil War.