ipl-logo

Why Did The Founding Fathers Need To Draft The Constitution

693 Words3 Pages

These national "superstars" did not, however, include people from western parts of the country, nor did it include any artisans or tenant farmers. Indeed, there was only a single person of modest wealth whom we could consider a yeoman farmer. These were superstars and that meant that they did not reflect anything close to the full range of American society. Partly because the delegates had already served as national representatives, they shared a general commitment to a strong central government. Many were strong nationalists who thought the Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states and were especially concerned about state governments' vulnerability to powerful local interests. Instead, the delegates to the Philadelphia Convention aimed to create an energetic NATIONAL GOVERNMENT that could deal effectively with the major problems of the period from external matters of diplomacy and trade to …show more content…

They already had the Articles of Confederation as a model for the nation. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation did not give the Federal government enough authority, leaving the power instead with the states. This link, from the Federalist Papers, provides Hamilton's list of the weaknesses (1787). Report broken link Articles of Confederation vs. the Constitution This site may not win any awards for its attractiveness with its yellow background, but when it comes to information, very few sites are as excellent. From interstate trade to levying taxes, this comparison between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution will answer any questions that you have about the differences between these two important historical documents. In addition, this site links to a larger area with well-organized outlines and charts detailing the most influential periods in U.S. history. Report broken link Constitution of the United

Show More
Related

  • Fifty-Five Delegates At The Philadelphia Convention Of 1787

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    In May of 1787, fifty-five delegates from eleven of the thirteen American states came together in Philadelphia. The goal that they had was to fix and improve the current government created by the Articles of Confederation, which had been occurring since the year of 1781. The Articles created a weak alliance among the states. There was nothing that the national government could do about the taxes or regulate commerce. The delegates whom attended the Philadelphia convention had came to agreement that there were issues in the Articles of Confederation that needed to be fixed.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation Shays Rebellion

    330 Words  | 2 Pages

    Later on, people realized that they were in urgent need for a government reformation. This supported the federalists demand for creating a powerful government. The articles of confederation were a plan established in 1781, and were a limited government that gave most of its power to the states. The articles of confederation were too weak

    Read More

  • How Did The Central Government Created When The Articles Of Confederation Were Not Working Well

    807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Week 6 Review Questions 1. How did the limited central government created by the Articles of Confederation reflect the issues behind the Revolution and fears for individual liberties? The limited central government represented more of a peace treaty between that states than a blueprint for a powerful nation. It was created to maintain national coordination during the Revolution, but not much more; The States still held most of the power. The only powers the national government held were those essential to the Revolution such as declaring war, conducting foreign affairs, and making treaties with other governments (Foner 249).

    Read More

  • How Did The Article Of Confederation Have A Strong Central Government

    841 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, they did not form this kind of government because they were fear of a government with so much authority, which same as British system. This cause guided the Article of Confederation had an inherent weakness which set sovereign power in the hands of each state. In Article II, which explicitly stated, “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right (Brackemyre, 2015).” They didn’t make a strong national government, but constructed an American government rely on dominant state governments. Thus, due to the reason of absence of strong, powerful government that generated a series of limitations and issues to make it lost efficacy.

    Read More

  • Why Did The Us Need A Constitutional Convention Of 1787

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    According to the materiel Of The People, moderate nationalists wanted to create a stronger central government while the radical localists resisted fearing that this would subvert their liberties. The nationalists in congress realized that the national government was powerless concerning the current economic issues, they lacked money and could not pay the army they had. In the middle 1780’s several nationalists began to call for a constitutional convention. Before the Constitutional Convention in 1787 there were two previous meetings. Over the summer of 1787, 55 men from twelve states wrote a document to strengthen their government, this became one of the most influential documents in the history of the world.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Lead To A Rebellion

    141 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were the first document created after the American Revolution. The Articles of Confederation were problematic for the nation because they gave to much power to the states. For instance, the articles did not include a central banking system, no executive, legislative, nor judicial branch of federal government. Therefore, the power of the country resided in the states, and this lead to an ambiguous nation with no stability. For example, some states were creating their own money and negotiated deals with other countries that did not include all the other states.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Articles Of Confederation

    270 Words  | 2 Pages

    What were the Articles of Confederation? (1-2 sentences) The Articles of confederation was a draft that took 12 years in the making, it was later used to create the US constitution; the states laws of governance. It is how the government is run and explains its values. The main difference between the two articles is, the Articles of Confederation in practice would have little power to the central government.

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Brilliant Solution

    1319 Words  | 6 Pages

    If anyone was to do even a little research about the United States in 1787, one would find that the states were not very unified and life was not easy. Men like, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and George Washington had one thing in mind, to reunite the United States. The book, A Brilliant Solution by Carol Berkin, very clearly depicts the obstacles and adversity that the men attending the constitutional convention had to overcome. Due to a plethora of factors, the men attending the constitutional convention encountered many complications during the convention, ranging from travel issues to a lack of power to even do anything necessary to change the “United” States. The book shows this by describing the story of the men as a “story of anxious

    Read More

  • Why The Articles Of Confederation Failed

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    All these financial and political problems were due to a loose union of thirteen states known as the Articles of Confederation. Although the Articles of Confederation was a big help to make our new nation, it failed in many ways. The national government was unable to solve all the problems mentioned in the previous paragraphs. As a result, in 1787 a meeting was held in Philadelphia by Congress and asked each state to send their delegates to discuss about how to improve the Articles of Confederation. They wrote a new constitution even though they gather to improve the Article of Confederation.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation In 1781 And The Drafting Of The Constitution In 1787

    611 Words  | 3 Pages

    The period between the adoption of the Articles of Confederation in 1781 and the drafting of the new Constitution in 1787 was one of weakness, dissension and turmoil. Under the Articles of Confederation, no provisions were made for an executive branch to enforce the laws nor for a national court system to interpret them. A legislative Congress was the sole organ of the national government, but it had no power to force the states to do anything against their will. It could declare war and raise an army, but it could not force any state to meet its assigned quota for troops or for the arms and equipment needed to support them. It looked to the states for the income needed to finance its activities, but it could not punish a state for not contributing its share of the federal budget.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Influence The Constitution

    1018 Words  | 5 Pages

    After the Articles of Confederation failed because they failed to give enough power to the national government and congress, our founding father’s needed to reflect on its flaws for a new system to be set in place. Their new creation, our Constitution, was then set into place, and was created from a basis of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation directly influence the Constitution by its failure by changing some of the responsibilities of the federal and state governments. The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states, and the Constitution changed that.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Compromise

    298 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Great Compromise which was founded at the Constitutional Convention wasn't formed without trouble. Many of the delegates that participated in the convention were wealthy landowners and lawyers, who owned many slaves. They failed to notice the diversity that excited within the nation. As they talked how to repair the Articles of Confederation, issues would arise that would create continuous debates amongst each other. One of the issues that would arise would be the nature of the new government.

    Read More

  • Why Are The Articles Of Confederation Still Relevant Today

    798 Words  | 4 Pages

    The convention was held solely for the purpose of replacing the Articles of Confederation. The new Constitution was created with the intention of establishing a form of a central government that with real power. The lack of power and ability to unite the state governments as one sovereign nation had been an extreme issue with the Articles. The articles had left the state governments sovereign and bound them together with an extremely weak form of a “treatie” for emergency situations. This left trade and other important issues at the mercy of the states and put the young nation in a state of turmoil.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

    Read More

  • Discuss The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Articles of the Confederation was the first government constitution that the United States used, and, although there were strength like the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, there were major weaknesses of the Articles of the Confederation like the following: requiring 9 out of the 13 colonial votes from the representatives from different states to pass a law; having no executive and judicial branch; and the federal government being unable to impose tax revenue onto the states. Such flaws would eventually lead to the Constitution and the repeal of the articles, for the Constitution was a measure to fix the problems of the articles with a stronger government that allowed them to impose taxes and and implement new laws for a more effective government.

    Read More

More about Why Did The Founding Fathers Need To Draft The Constitution

Open Document