Why Do Animal Rights Groups Interact Or Misrepresented?
Statistics are often seen in the media, and use by various groups to act as factual information that scientifically backs the claims of the group, or so they say. There have been many accounts of statistics misused or misrepresented. As seen in the article “Nine out of ten Statistics are taken out of Context,” the statistics used in medical testing on animals has often been taken out of context and misrepresented by several different animal rights groups. It does not come as a surprise that a group opposed to a practice would use whatever data they can to further their position. Saying that something is 90% ineffective and thus should not be used is a fairly impressive number to have on your side. However, any time such a high number is used to prove a point, it should call for a further examination of the evidence. In the article “Nine out of ten Statistics are taken out of Context”, it can be seen where animal rights groups used the position that 90% of medicines that pass animal trials fail in human trials. As such, animal trials are ineffective as should not be used. …show more content…
However, the animal groups are misrepresenting the data and taking the data completely out of context. The high failure rate means that the trials are working correctly to ensure potentially dangerous medicines or those that are ineffective do not make it onto the market. The animal trials help prevent many potentially dangerous medicines from reaching the human stage of testing, and could not be done any other way without placing human subjects at undue risk. However, several animal rights groups have spun these numbers and place them in their own context in order to make the number appear to back their
Radical Animal Rights Groups Harm Society Summary
640 Words | 3 PagesTeresa Platt is an executive director for the Fur Commission U.S.A. division which works on behalf of mink farmers and furriers. The Fur Commission U.S.A represents over 600 mink and fox farming families in nearly 31 states. Throughout the article “Radical Animal Rights Groups Harm Society,” Platt describes to the reader how several animal rights and environmental groups such as the Animal Liberation Front, or the ALF, and the Earth Liberation Front, or the ELF, discriminate against honest farmers. She also claims that radical environmentalists vandalize mink and dairy farmers with the assumption that people can live without misusing animals. Lastly, she maintains that people have always depended on animal products such as food and clothing for survival.
Frankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
743 Words | 3 PagesThey assert that it is the best way to save a lot of people's lives by using relatively small numbers of animals. Trull says that the success of animal testing has led to safe treatments for human. Admittedly, this is certainly true about some animal testing. However, in the USA, more than 100,000 people died due to the drugs that were successfully passed by animal testing. This fact shows that even though the drugs have been developed and tested successfully on animals, they are not 100 percent safe.
Argument Essay: 11 Facts About Animal Testing
887 Words | 4 PagesAccording to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people.
Animal Testing Is Bad Essay
802 Words | 4 Pages“Nine out of ten drugs that pass animal studies fails in humans” (Moore 2). Many patients in the world of medicine need drugs with low risk factors. Animal experiment is becoming a thing of the past and for good reasons. The experiments are no longer answering the scientists questions, but when the products does work on animals it is never going to be hundred percent for humans. Animal experimentation is wrong because animals can register pain just like humans, the medication is not reliable, and money is lost when it is ineffective.
Pro Animal Testing
994 Words | 4 PagesThe scientists and doctors treat the living beings with such disrespect, ignorance, and cruelty. They treat it as if it is a test object, but not a living being. Also, animal use cannot always be reliable and accurate. For example, many drugs that appear safe and effective in animals fail in humans, or cause significant harm and sometimes even death. A 2004 study from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that 92 percent of drugs entering clinical trials following animal testing fail to be approved.
Benefits Of Animal Testing
1212 Words | 5 PagesThe opponents ' evidence is unreliable in that the studies of animal testing were conducted in 2010, and since then, laws and techniques have been changed to help prevent animal cruelty. Since laws have been implemented, scientists are taking precautions to prevent animal cruelty. It is obvious that these precautions are yielding good results because cures are being found. Additionally, it would be even more cruel to test on humans as well as more expensive. There are many consequences to human testing.
People Fight Against Animal Rights
1010 Words | 5 PagesMany people fight for animal rights. They demand that animal testing should be banned. They think that it is very unethical and wasteful. With the development of technologies, people think that animal testing is archaic, and there are many alternative ways. Often animal testing fails, and it is cruel to play with their lives.
Why Is Animal Testing Unnecessary
936 Words | 4 PagesThose statistics come from the US Department of Agriculture (New Technologies). Many argue that animal testing is not helpful and unnecessary. According to Andrew Rowan, “Aside from the ethical issues [animal testing] pose[s]--inflicting both physical as well as psychological distress and suffering on large numbers of sentient creatures--animal tests are time- and resource-intensive . . . provide little understanding of how chemicals behave in the body, and . . .
Animal Cruelty: The Negative Effects Of Testing On Animals
780 Words | 4 PagesIn order to test cures they will need to infect the animal with it and it could possibly kill them (PETA). Animals get harmed or killed when tested on. When getting tested on the scientists need to make the animal die or put them in pain just to test. Testing on animals will make them blind, sick, and many more dangerous actions. Animals should not die or be harmed for unnecessary products.
The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesMillions upon millions of animals are killed mercilessly every year due to these experiments. “Most animal experiments are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses” (Animal). Not only does this testing waste animal lives, but humans as well. Because animal testing is so ineffective, many humans have contracted illness, irritations, mental problems, etc. because of these drugs being successful on animals and not humans.
Why Animal Experimentation Is Unethical
1066 Words | 5 PagesIn “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in
Why Is Animal Testing Allowed
702 Words | 3 PagesAnimal rights companies have that the tests will not always deliver accurate results. If we inject an animal with a strain of a disease and find a cure that works for that animal how do we know that it will on humans? “The monoclonal antibody TGN1412 was safe in monkeys at five hundred times the dose tested in humans, yet all six British volunteers who received the drug in 2006 nearly died. Conversely simple aspirin produces birth defects in at least 7 animal species yet is safe in humans. Every 1 of 197 human trials using 85 HIV/AIDS vaccines tested have failed.
Animal Testing In Society
1018 Words | 5 PagesAccording to the article, “About us” on understandinganimalresearch.org, only 0.2% of all animals in the world are used for both scientific and commercial animal testing. Animal testing is the process of experiments being done on non-human animals, and this process is performed to ensure the safety of cosmetics, drugs, and food additives. Humans only use animal testing when there is no other available options, and animal testing is practiced on endless amounts of products that are very essential in our lives today (Murnaghan). Scientists have developed great deals of vaccine and medicine, as a result, human kids, toddlers, and the elderly’s precious lives have been saved from death. Animal testing is a controversial topic in society, and while supporters
Why Is Animal Testing Better Than Medical Research
627 Words | 3 PagesThroughout history, scientists have discovered life-saving treatments for thousands of diseases. Many different methods have been used to find the treatments, yet animal testing has probably been the most successful and efficient method used throughout the past. Considering, that is only one of the reasons that people believe that animal testing should continue to take a large role in modern health studies. Consequently, law regulated animal testing should continue to be practiced, as it is much more effective than clinical research, it prevents animals from being tortured during testing, and to develop a new field of health study would be extremely expensive. To illustrate, animal testing can be seen as much more effective than other types of clinical research.
Animal Testing: The Reality Of Animal Experimentation
509 Words | 3 PagesMedical advances are supposed to help better human lives, however, animal experiments are doing the opposite. According to Ray Greek and Jean Greek, the co founders of Americans for Medical Advancements, which is a nonprofit organization
More about Why Do Animal Rights Groups Interact Or Misrepresented?
Radical Animal Rights Groups Harm Society Summary
640 Words | 3 PagesFrankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
743 Words | 3 PagesArgument Essay: 11 Facts About Animal Testing
887 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Testing Is Bad Essay
802 Words | 4 PagesPro Animal Testing
994 Words | 4 PagesBenefits Of Animal Testing
1212 Words | 5 PagesPeople Fight Against Animal Rights
1010 Words | 5 PagesWhy Is Animal Testing Unnecessary
936 Words | 4 PagesAnimal Cruelty: The Negative Effects Of Testing On Animals
780 Words | 4 PagesThe Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing
604 Words | 3 PagesWhy Animal Experimentation Is Unethical
1066 Words | 5 PagesWhy Is Animal Testing Allowed
702 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing In Society
1018 Words | 5 PagesWhy Is Animal Testing Better Than Medical Research
627 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Testing: The Reality Of Animal Experimentation
509 Words | 3 Pages