Taking pills and injecting testosterone are popular ways that athletes use PEDs. The whole reason that athletes choose to take these drugs is because of the unfair advantages they gain. Athletes take these drugs knowing it will increase their athletic ability and decrease their rest time. Anyone that knowingly takes a drug that will increase their ability is not playing their sport the acceptable way, and obviously this glorified cheating should not be allowed. Evan Argintar, an orthopedic surgeon at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, had this to say about performance enhancing drugs.
Next, the consequences for using steroids are huge. Lastly (transition), many athletes that use steroids are better than their opponents, by cheating. Athletes that use steroids should have bigger consequences. First of all (transitions), reports show that athletes that use steroids have a number of health issues. According to www.drugabuse.gov , all steroid users could get liver damage, heart disease, changes in cholesterol, and weight loss.While (conjunctions) males will develop breast, have shrinking testicals,
Performance-Enhancing-Drugs (PED) takes advantage of the athletes and their bodies causing more muscles to increase in size and the bloods oxygen capacity. With the intake of drugs commonly happening more within athletes the performance-enhancing drugs are being outlawed by groups of organizations to help prevent the drug use within athletes. This makes getting PED’s difficult and much more dangerous to be around because of drug testing. Every
Even though using performance enhancement drugs can give athletes benefits, but it can also cause harm and severe danger as well, therefore using drugs in sports should still be illegal. Competitors would prepare harder and try to meet their goals while some will attempt to cheat their way by utilizing enhanced medications to expand their capacities even beyond. The want to win is very affected in the idea of games, and a few competitors will do whatever it takes to ascend to the top. Over the most recent few years, numerous competitors in various games have been caught using performance enhancement drugs. At the point when a competitor tests positive to participate in sports, the competitor is either disqualified or suspended for the entire game.
In “Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sports Fast Facts”, the article states, "Anabolic steroids are natural and synthetic substances that help build muscle mass, enabling athletes to train harder and recover quickly from strenuous workouts" (Performance Enhancing Drugs). This shows that steroids are used to speed up the process of becoming stronger. It is true that steroids speed up the process of becoming stronger, the result of using substances and drugs is that they will have a bad effect on a person’s body and a person’s mental health. Also steroids can hurt sports. According to some studies steroid use could lead to cancer, heart failure and even cardiovascular problems.
The use of performance-enhancing drugs creates a disadvantage for the athletes that don't use PEDs since they will not perform as well as the athletes that used the drugs during the game or competition. Also, when drugs are used it takes the human effort away from sports where athletes have trained hard. There are many different types of PEDs and here are some of the major ones that are used: Stimulants: Stimulants are substances that act directly on the central nervous system to speed up parts of the brain and body. Anabolic steroids: They build muscle and increase endurance. They are used mostly by football players and weightlifters.
He turns to Tamburrini's positive arguments for lifting the ban, challenging three specific claims: “that lifting the ban will erase competitive inferiority, that it will help athletes in perfecting their skills, and that it will improve knowledge that can reduce harm to athletes”. Erasing competitive inferiority is just a fancy way of saying that the playing field for professional sports will be more even in terms of athletic ability. Every player at the professional level has the necessary elite skill set or they wouldn’t be there, but not everybody is blessed with super-natural athleticism as most of the best players are in the professional leagues. Using performance enhancing drugs could balance that out by giving that skilled player the elite athleticism he needs to go from being good to an all-star. Every athlete in the world wants to be the best they can be and want to perfect their sport they play.
Both men had the same motive and willingness to kill the child, but the only difference was one killed while the other let them die. In this situation there is not a moral difference between killing and letting die. I believe the majority would agree that both are morally wrong. People might think that Dr. Rachels’s argument only works with negative motives, but it also works for euthanasia where the motives are generally for a positive reason such as relieving a patient from their suffering. For instance, looking at either passive euthanasia or active euthanasia it is the same positive motive and the same result and once again it only comes down to the killing and letting them die.
The most common type of doping is stimulants to overcome stress and challenges that athletes have. Is it appropriate for citizens to revolt against steroid use in sports. Athletes should not be able to take steroids to increase their strength. Steroid use in sports is cheating, if found out that a team is doping in sports they can be eliminated from the event. Although some may argue that steroid use in sports can increase athletes performance.
Performance Enhancing Drugs Introduction Performance enhancing drugs have become almost an established part of sports activities in our society, and allows the athletes to reach lengths they could never have dreamed of reaching without these drugs. However the ethical question of whether performance enhancing drugs are highly unfair and even dangerous, or if they are no worse than more traditional ways of enhancing performances, stands unanswered. Taking my point of departure in the points presented by the three authors, Travis Track, David Van Mill and Richard Taite, I will discuss the benefits and disadvantages of performance enhancing drugs. Outline In his article “The Inside Dope: Professional Athletes and Performance Enhancing Drugs”, Travis Track is discussing the view on doping in the past as opposed to the view on doping now. He claims, that before the 70’s, people did not care if athletes used performance enhancing drugs (PED’s), but today they do.