Why officers should wear body cameras The federal government should provide body cameras for police officers to improve the way the officers and the public respond because of accountability, instill trust, and prevent violence. Police Officers wearing body cameras are now being held as a solution to preventing police conduct and enhancing police accountability. With these cameras, we will be more Intune with an officer's appropriate and inappropriate conduct. For example, these cameras will keep track of what the officer says or does when at the scene of the crime. Having these cameras will also speed up court proceedings and reducing the cost of court.
Although beliefs may not all be positive, Body cameras should still be used in the police force around the country. The case in New Mexico is proof that body cameras should be used because it showed that there were false claims of sexual misconduct against the police officer who pulled over an intoxicated woman. The officer’s camera showed the moment the woman quickly slipped her phone into her shirt when the officer wasn’t looking and later at the station
For me it is a very exciting to learn about each case of police brutality and dive into it to see why what happened, happened. The issue seems to be so wide that it is not a clear cut yes or no issue on determining if it is a targeted act or not, which drives me to even more because it is something I can learn more about. Lastly, it seems like something that can bring people together if we can agree on a way to help fix the accidental brutality cases, but instead it does not do that which makes it even more compelling to me. I know that police brutality can either be accidental or used when a police officer is trying to defend him or herself. Another thing that I know and have observed about this issue is that it hasn’t just sprung up, but instead it has become more easily brought to our attention because of people filming these intendents and posting them on their social media pages.
By improving the funding that is given to police departments, it will permit police officers better training in handling these situations and preventing them as well rather than instigating them. With better preparation, officers will be ready to handle any backlash caused by terrorist attacks. These hate crimes that officers should be prepped for are usually stimulated by the media. However, the information that is
Very good discussion Thomas, I also concur that the purpose of 'ban the box ' is to give an ex-offender a better shot at going farther in You have provided many valid points regarding the use of body cameras by police officers. Indeed that the utilization of body cameras by officers do provide transparency and accountability towards potential and suspect individual in question to include officers ' conduct. The officers must also use good judgment and with plenty of discretion when executing their legal authority to use such device. Like you also mentioned, some witnesses would be reluctant in assisting with the investigation, if they know that video cameras could potentially be release to the public that could result in retribution.
In addition, the police department will be looking into getting a federal grant for the distribution of body cameras and tasers for all patrol officers. Tasers would allow officers the ability to quickly resolve a violent confrontation without the need of added risk of further injury to all involved. The hope of the body cameras is that supervisors can monitor the behavior of their officers and also use the video footage as training opportunities on how officers could do better in the future. According to Lawrence (2015), “Proponents of the technology claim that benefits of body cameras include the ability to record all interactions and conversations between police and citizens’ and the ability to keep law enforcement officers accountable for the amount of force they use during altercations” (p. 615). With the level of authority that is given to officers to conduct their duties there needs to be a high level of accountability and body cameras could easily provide the desired level of accountability.
Police brutality is a real problem that creates a huge divide between people. Police are the peacekeepers and most of them are good, but some abuse their power and authority. People under their protection must not lose faith in them. The vast majority of the police force throughout America joins to make their community a better and safer place, some however, lose the way of the oath they take, that says they will treat everyone with equal rights and respect, and start to abuse their power, but faith should still be put in them. Some may say that all police are corrupt, and are only there for power and/or to benefit themselves, and we should not trust them.
Police are supposed to possess a moral code that is righteous in nature and maintains only good intentions. They are not supposed to take small gifts from the populace as it increases the chances that small forms of corruption will take root and bloom into something that’s beyond their control. Leadership within the policing environment plays a crucial role in keeping the subordinates on the straight and narrow as they should lead by example (Martin 2017). However, the officers, themselves, must truly represent the ideals that the agency believes in to keep corruption at a minimum. Martin established how letting one’s guard down to corrupting influences can turn a good cop into a bad one after a prolonged period of
This amendment is also very important because people like the police would have too much power over other people. For example a normal person could be patted down and searched just if they looked suspicious and this is a violation of their body and property which they deserve the right to have control of. The Fourth Amendment has dramatically changed our country by protecting people’s personal items and property. Although there are still some mixed opinions about the Fourth Amendment most people are for it and believe that it is a great way for them to feel safe in their homes and with their possessions. Many people that are for the Fourth Amendment believe that it is a great amendment that protects them from unnecessary searches or when police abuse the law and destroy property to find what they need.
Regulations on use of force are so important simply because it regulates those who fight corruption, and you can 't fight corruption with corruption. Even with corruption in the police force being a thing, the numbers are almost non existent as described previously in this paper. Law Enforcement as a whole has been put down and stomped on
There are both civilians and police who say that body cameras should be allowed, enforced and encouraged. The civilians saying that the extra eyes make sure they are treated fairly, and the officers saying that the cameras can help prevent them from being penalized for action that should have been taken. On the other end are those still uncomfortable with their crimes being recorded and officers who think that the body cameras are excessive and
Police brutality has been one of the most dangerous issues that have been happening around the united states. A solution that has been talked about worldwide is body cameras on police officers. This solution would be very successful in stopping or decreasing police brutality The one that would be successful is the body cameras because the station would know what is going on at all times. How this solution is better is because this solution of body cameras would decrease the amount of crimes caused by the police and this would be beneficial for the police academy to have body cameras on the officers at all times. For example, the police at ASU now have body cameras on them at all times,"It 's just a process of us bringing the ASU police department