Chemical Warfare easily played a big role in many of our World Wars. Chemical Warfare is using chemical compounds as a weapon to use in war that involves toxic properties. It happens to be very deadly and was a way to kill an area within seconds. Since the founding of chemical warfare, many scientists like to call it a weapon of mass destruction. Many countries have decided to ban the substances all together, but because there are weaker armies those countries have chosen to keep all substances to use for fighting in battles. With this happening, the countries that banned all chemical warfare have to find a way to protect themselves from breathing in these compounds and to stay in battle to fight off these other countries. In the article written by Harold Maass, he asked the question of why chemical warfare is different from other weapons, “In a literal sense, they 're not, since the goal of warfare is to kill lots of people in an efficient way. Bombs, missiles, and other munitions achieve very similar results, especially when dropped on civilian areas. But chemical weapons evoke a strong emotional response, perhaps …show more content…
Chemical warfare has never been fully banned completely. Chemical weapons were only to be used if countries wanted to produce or stock them up. “Even the Nazis — who used gas to murder prisoners in masses in concentration camps — never unleashed gases on the battlefield,” says Harold Maass. Even though the Nazis used this weapon to kill large groups of people who were held captive, they never got the idea to use it in war. For a while, many countries wanted this banned for good. Harold continued to explain, “In 1899, major Western nations participating in the Hague Peace Conference went further, approving an agreement to prohibit the firing of any projectiles "the sole object of which is the diffusion of asphyxiating or deleterious gases." The ban didn 't stand long.” The government could have tried everything and would only succeed for a short
The Germans wanted to remove the salient so they introduced a new weapon, chlorine gas. Description of the War: The Germans wanted to remove the Canadian soldiers by introducing a new weapon, poison chlorine gas. In this battle, it was the first time soldiers had used chlorine gas as a battlefield
When this agent has been unleashed into a highly populated area with personnel it can lead to major chaos trophic event with many casualties and injured personnel. Past history events have supported the fact that the use of sarin is a highly toxic agent to unleash into society CBRN Agent background “GB is a first generation nerve agent that was identified in 1938 as a potential chemical agent
The first world war is known to be one of the harshest wars in history for many reasons. One of those reasons is the unleashing of terrifying new weapons, gas weapons. Dangerous chemicals and gases have been used as weapons since thousands of years ago, though it was until World War 1 where the first large-scale of them was used. Battles normally ended in a draw, which prompted finding new fighting strategies. Four main kinds of gases were used; tear, chlorine, phosgene, and mustard (I, n.d.).
Although this chemical helped at the time, it ruined lives in the
Agent Orange is a dioxin, defoliant, and a mix of herbicides that have affected many people for the past 4 generations. During the Vietnam War the US military decided to spray this dioxin in the jungles of Vietnam and the Korean demilitarized zone to remove trees and dense tropical foliage that provided enemy cover. From the Vietnam War until now, many lives have been ruined and harmed due to Agent Orange and the people who have been exposed to this chemical have either had kids with birth defects or have obtained a disease or sickness as they age and through scientific research it was found that Agent Orange was the cause of these occurrences. Due to the many horrific damages from Agent Orange the US Congress had created the Agent Orange act of 1991 in order to help those who are eligible, receive certain benefits. Today I 'm going to be telling you several reasons why the Agent Orange Act of 1991 should be renewed for the next 5 years.
In the autumn of 1918, the virus entered the United States through a variety of sources according to different theories. Many feared a German drug company had laced Aspirin, one of the most commonly used drugs, with this virus. The need for medications like Aspirin to supply soldiers and families during wartime led credence to this theory because of how quickly it spread. Another idea stated that German U-Boats entered the Boston Harbor at night and broke vials of the disease throughout the city. Because of Americans conflict with the Germans in World War I, the American people feared the use of chemical warfare as a weapon of mass destruction.
In the Vietnam War, Agent Orange was one of the factors that led to the death of innocent people. The U.S. was arguing that Agent Orange is not a chemical or a biological weapon because it was considered as a herbicide and a defoliant. Americans put forward such a claim in order to justify themselves, and said that their main aim was to destroy plant crops to debar the enemy from cover and they didn’t mean to target human beings. (Schuck, 1987. p.19)
One way of warfare during WWI was chemical warfare. Chemical warfare was first used when gas was just released from large cylinders and carried by the air and wind into enemy lines. This eventually evolved and other gases were loaded into the shells The shells were then blasted into other enemies trenches and forts. People did wear gas masks to try and protect themselves from the gases but soldiers could not fight as hard with a gas mask on their face. Another type of warfare used during World War I was trench warfare.
Vietnam War was the most controversial, divisive and one of the longest wars that was fought in the era of the Cold War, for 20 years from 1944 to 1973. The mass defoliation of the forest cover in South Vietnam to paralyze the Vietnamese of performing Guerrilla Warfare by the use of a toxic herbicide called Agent Orange, affecting the land and water resources and disrupting the forest and marine ecosystems. The toxic dioxin blends with a component, naturally present in every cell, the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor and enters the cellular nucleus as a hormone thereby rising through the food chains by bioaccumulation. The affected genes got transferred from one generation to another and brought about a positive death-rate in the war era. However,
This would allow enemy troops to easily mow down their targets and force unaffected individuals to flee the area. An insignificant amount of deaths were related to chemical warfare in
World War I. The Germans fired chlorine gas during World War
Sarin also called NATO is a highly toxic synthetic Organophosphorus compound. Organophosphorus is organic compounds containing phosphorus it is mostly used in pest control. It’s a colorless, odorless liquid it’s used as a weapon of mass destruction because of its potency to your nerves. (Foundation, Sarin) Exposure to it
During the War, “U.S. planes sprayed some 11 million to 13 million gallons of Agent Orange,” a chemical used to destroy forests in Vietnam (“Agent Orange”). At the time, the side effects of the toxin remained unknown, yet veterans questioned and suspected it caused a series of physical and mental illnesses. Air force veteran, Charlie Owens “attributed his cancer to the Agent Orange sprayed by his unit in Vietnam. When Owens died ‘His wife relayed these concerns to the VA… [who] rejected the notion that Owen’s cancer was related to herbicide use” (Scott 87).
During the assault weapons ban of 1994, gun deaths were significantly low, as shown in a graph in the Washington Post. This shows that another ban on assault weapons, and possibly a permanent one, could largely impact the force leading to gun violence and
Churchill’s controversial personality continues to rear its head during the Kurdish revolt against British rule in newly-created Iraq. At this time, chemical warfare was in its infancy and its use was in dispute. When the question was raised of whether to use these weapons or not, Churchill stated; “I am strongly in favour of using poison gas against uncivilized tribes, it would spread a lively terror.” (1920).