Ronald Dworkin's Views On Judicial Discretion
Counter-Position to my argument
The question at hand is whether judges can exercise discretion when deciding cases. Different theories arrive at different conclusions. Legal positivists, such as H. L. A. Hart, claim that in difficult cases judges do exercise discretion. An alternative theory of law offered by Ronald Dworkin contains some aspects of positivism. Dworkin believes that judges do not have discretion. This is a counter position to my argument that judges do have judicial discretion.
Firstly, we need to look at what Dworkin and positivists mean by discretion. Dworkin distinguishes between ‘weak’ discretion and ‘strong’ discretion. The ordinary usage of the term ‘discretion’ refers to ‘weak’ discretion. The discretion that is attributed to a person with final authority to make a decision, a judge, is also ‘weak’ discretion. Dworkin defines a ‘strong’ concept of discretion as where someone who has ‘discretion’ in making a decision is not bound by standards set by an authority. This is the kind of discretion Dworkin is concerned with.
…show more content…
Dworkin interprets the positivist 's claim that a judge has discretion as meaning that the judge has the right to make any decision he wishes and that he is not obligated to arrive at any particular decision. This is the claim of the legal positivist to which Dworkin objects.
Dworkin and positivists believe that in most cases judges arrive at decisions by applying pre-existing law. In such cases, judges exercise no discretion in formulating their
Chief Justice John Marshall: The Balance Of Power In The United States
504 Words | 3 PagesThe founding father’s idea when they created the Constitution was to prevent a centralized government. As expressed by James Madison in Federalist No. 51, they believe that the power surrendered by people would be divided between the federal and state governments, creating balance of power that would enable both governments to control each other. Over time, the balance of power between the federal and state governments has shifted in favor of the federal government and this has taken place with the help of the Constitution and by enactments of Congress. The role that Chief Justice John Marshall played in defining the power of the federal and state governments during the early 19th century is important to mention because he shaped the nation.
Dbq Essay On The Judicial Branch
467 Words | 2 PagesThis means that they can’t really be bribed. Document B talks about this when it says, “The judiciary, on contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society;” This is saying that the Judicial Branch has no control over the money or power of the government. For this reason there is really no way for the Judicial Branch to be bribed. This makes their decisions based actually on what they think and not what other people want them to think.
Fugitive Slave Law Research Paper
2386 Words | 10 PagesAlthough not all legal philosophers think alike, some of them will probably believe the jurors in Morris did the wrong thing. In addition, H.L.A Hart has a differing view on Positivism. Hart agrees with Austin on the how Constitutions shape the laws. In addition, Hart sees the law as a system of rules which he calls primary and secondary rules. Primary rules are the do’s and don’ts of society.
Two Rulings Are Examples Of Judicial Restraint Or Judicial Activist
157 Words | 1 PagesExplain how the two rulings are examples of judicial restraint or judicial activism use evidence from the reading to back up your response. The Plessy V. Ferguson1896 case is an example of judicial restraint. It is an example of judicial restraint because the argument Plessy made supports the idea that segregation is not equality, it makes the black race feel inferior. The court disagreed because it isn’t legal or political therefore constitutional by technicality.
Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'
710 Words | 3 PagesRosenberg first gives rough definitions of the "Dynamic Court" and the "Constrained Court," which he considers the two possible views to be held about the court system's influence, though he believes both are over simplifications by themselves. The "Dynamic Court" sees the judiciary "as powerful, vigorous, and potent proponents of change" (Rosenberg 1991, 2). Proponents this theory alone believe the courts have great power and influence to effect social change, but Rosenberg believes the 'mystification' of the judicial system has given this view more allure than truth. Under the "Constrained Court" theory, courts are "weak, powerless, and ineffective for change," have little power nor influence to
Discretion In Law Enforcement
809 Words | 4 PagesDiscretion is an official action taken by a police officer or any other agent of criminal justice in whereby they use their individual judgement to decide the course of action suitable for an occurring incident. In criminal justice, an officer considers the totality of circumstances before reaching on a decision to either take legal action or not against an individual. And to what extend the and kind of action will be take (Griffiths, 2013: 122), for instance; warning or arresting the individual. Furthermore, discretion is the privilege or permission granted to officers to use their own judgement to make practical decisions. However there are also attached constraints to this.
The Constrained Court
429 Words | 2 PagesThe Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case
Models Of Justice In The Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey Case
1529 Words | 7 PagesAbstract The purpose of this research paper is to choose which of these models of justice: retributive, utilitarian, restorative or parallel, is appropriate for the Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey case. We need justice to be delivered efficiently, effectively in order to make sure the offenders are held accountable and the victims receive assistance. Each crime that is committed needs to be addressed properly. When the crimes are not then that leads to the unrest in the community and to the victims.
Merit Plan Pros And Cons
694 Words | 3 PagesThe appointment of judges has become clearly political. It is not uncommon to hear of candidates making statements with regards to contested political issues as well as the use of partisan language. According to (Bannon, 10) “For neutral arbiters, this heightened political temperature risks exacerbating pressures to decide cases based on political loyalty or expediency, rather than on their understanding of the law.” The selection of judges through popular election therefore suffers serious flaws since the electorate tend to base their decisions on charm instead of serious determinants. The results can be that the person elected as a judge turns out to be one who falls short of the glory of this office in terms of experience, legal training and education.
Judicial Restraint Vs. Judicial Activism
1014 Words | 5 PagesEssentially, judicial restraint works to preserve the laws already in place and refrain from making significant changes to public policies. But much like judicial activism, judicial restraint isn’t perfect; the major flaw of judicial restraint is that it does
The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods
462 Words | 2 PagesWhen people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.
Police Discretion Case Study
463 Words | 2 PagesThe Australian police force is one of the most noticeable and influential agencies of social control within society. Because of this, the NSW Code of Practice signifies in attempting improving the liability of the NSW Police to the community it serves. The Code of Practice complements the NSW Police’s code of Conduct & Ethics by providing an ethical framework for police, by reinforcing the need for all officers to act with honesty and integrity. These codes are created upon members of the NSW Police acting in accordance to morals and values such as treating everyone with respect, courtesy and fairness and powers are applied correctly and sensibly. These ethics aim to improve the Police’s NSW Police Force Code of Practice as it requires officers to put good practice into place.
Why The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful
478 Words | 2 PagesHana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.
Essay On Judicial Selection
801 Words | 4 PagesThis may cause a judge to render a decision based on obligation instead of holding true to their beliefs. This pressure is not easily felt as intensely by appointed judges, especially those with lengthy terms. In considering the equity of the pros and cons it is my opinion that the existing system in place works best. Every system is flawed.
Personal Reflection On Law: A Personal Study Of Law
975 Words | 4 PagesLaw personal statement main As a child, looking up to law-enforcers such as police officer’s has made me believe that Law is the backbone of our society. Without it, everyday life would not be tolerable. My passion for law developed when I stepped into the Supreme Court and watched a court case in the Old Bailey.
More about Ronald Dworkin's Views On Judicial Discretion
Chief Justice John Marshall: The Balance Of Power In The United States
504 Words | 3 PagesDbq Essay On The Judicial Branch
467 Words | 2 PagesFugitive Slave Law Research Paper
2386 Words | 10 PagesTwo Rulings Are Examples Of Judicial Restraint Or Judicial Activist
157 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'
710 Words | 3 PagesDiscretion In Law Enforcement
809 Words | 4 PagesThe Constrained Court
429 Words | 2 PagesModels Of Justice In The Jonathan Nathaniel Ramsey Case
1529 Words | 7 PagesMerit Plan Pros And Cons
694 Words | 3 PagesJudicial Restraint Vs. Judicial Activism
1014 Words | 5 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods
462 Words | 2 PagesPolice Discretion Case Study
463 Words | 2 PagesWhy The Judicial Branch Is The Most Powerful
478 Words | 2 PagesEssay On Judicial Selection
801 Words | 4 PagesPersonal Reflection On Law: A Personal Study Of Law
975 Words | 4 Pages