You 're scared, you want to teach your child that this is not an expectable way to behave. Your main motive here is to keep your child safe. The issue with this scenario is that the child will fail to appreciate the danger, which was in that busy street or mall. Instead this child will ONLY remember and center ALL his attention to your reaction and anger. The cause of that anger will be lost.
Of course you will need to discipline your child, however “spanking” or hitting is not always the correct way to discipline a child. No abusive language; no abusive language meaning no profanity, words that can affect self esteem in a negative way, or yelling. All children will go to through the stage of their life where they do not want to listen, or they just want to get on your nerves and see how you will react. You may react with a voice of irritation one time, however if this behavior between both you and your child is constant, take into consideration how will this affect the parent- child relationship and maybe why does the child keep doing it. Also, various ways to handle situations where your child may be irritating.
Many students that know uniforms will be beneficially, but don’t agree with school uniforms will continue to disagree with implementing them. It can be easily agreed that school uniforms may take away their self-expression in school, but what matters more in school is the way of learning. It can also be agreed that many students do not accept the self-expression of their classmates and make fun of them. Students, parents, and school administration should be able to recognize the benefits that school uniforms come with. In conclusion, school uniforms are a great thing to have in schools.
In conclusion, John Gatto’s essay “Against School” is highly against the current educational system in the US and also in many other places that follow the same format that the US has acquired from Prussian culture. Modern schooling is hurting children more than helping them by causing them to fight each other for social standing. It is a brainwash for children and we must teach them to be adventurous, think outside the box, be independent, and develop an inner life so that they will never be bored, even in
Although the way Emerson thought the way people should act was ideal. I believe that to represent yourself in this manner, an individual would need life experience and an education. I believe that people would stop being influenced to follow the wrong footsteps of other individuals. Because what many people (mainly children) do in this day and age, is subject their minds to be corrupted, by individuals exposing themselves to physically and mentally harsh deeds. Even though maybe not intentional people do proceed to be influenced by these corrupted individuals, to then ruin themselves either physically or mentally.
it is always wrong to have children). Although I agree with Benatar’s asymmetry argument and admit that one is always seriously harmed because of her existence, I argue that the global anti-natalist conclusion does not follow. In order to do this, I will first present Benatar’s asymmetry argument. Then, I will show how a global anti-natalist conclusion fails to follow from his argument. I will next consider the particular reason that justifies procreation.
(source used) ii. What are their justifications? (source used) C. Refutation of the opponent’s view i. Prove that physical punishment is not the way to motivating your child into doing the right thing. (source used) D. Concluding Sentence: Therefore, it is obvious that physical punishment is still being used by parents widely, yet this idea can be easily opposed due to the physical harm that the child is exposed to and how this creates children’s fear from their parents rather than loving them.
However the the tracking devices would affect student attendance in a negative way. It will promote teen rebellion, students will go to school without an ID or skip school entirely. Attendance will be dropped and tracking devices will be the reason. Also if schools have to rely on this despicable tracking system it only shows the teacher's incompetence to take and report student attendance. Furthermore because of the tracking system embedded in students IDs are prone to be subjects to predators.
In the article, Children Need to Play, Not Compete, Jessica Statsky states that children now a day are very competitive, and she does not approve. She thinks Pee Wee sports are not enjoyable anymore because children are afraid of getting injured. Also, children do not smile anymore because the sport becomes a job for them. She claims that parents and coaches are pressuring the kids to be better and win all the time, and kids compete more to live up to their expectations and become depressed. Now the games are on the parent’s standards and it can affect the child both physically and psychologically.
In addition, it might cause deterioration in the family relationship. When parents are in complete control over the daily life of their children, they would cause resentment towards their parents. Family conflicts would eventually exist and children might become more rebellious which is contrary to the original objectives of applying authoritarian parenting. Therefore, it suggests that this parenting style is not effective and authoritative parenting would be a great substitute to replace