We all know that in the Philippines, there is this big divide between the rich and the poor. The poor get poorer, while the rich get richer. Why do think is that?
There are many reasons,but for purposes of simplifying, let us focus on one thing. The rich know how to get richer and they are actively engaged in activities that make them accumulate more wealth. On the other hand, the poor, who do not know how to make ends meet,are indebted up to future generations (this is an exaggeration, but may actually be true for someone out there),are averse to making money because they think money is evil, have poor mindset versus the wealthy mindset of the wealthy, and other reasons which I cannot fathom at this time.
Why do the rich get richer? Take the following situation.
One day, I was at a fast food store, queuing to
…show more content…
What else? Do you see the price of magic sarap and the like? I can 't remember the exact name of that product I bought--it costs, 4 pesos in the palengke, when it is supposed to cost only 1 peso! The poor pay more you think? You bet they do.
Now let us go to the all time favorite of all, the credit card.
The rich use their CC to the max and then by the end of the month, pay in full for whatever they purchased. What do they get for that? They get the full points, and they do not get charged by the bank.
What about the poor who also uses the credit card, and spends more than he can pay for? He will pay only a certain amount of what he owes -- not the total amount, therefore, he will be charged by the bank. "Konti lang naman," he says, but if you total that for one year, I doubt if you will still say konti lang naman.
What the poor pay for as fine, the rich enjoy. Shocking?
That is because there is inequality in the system. The system is rigged so that the rich become richer and the poor become poorer.
But it doesn 't have to stay that
Philippines and Canada are two different economic spectrum. The former has historically struggled with poverty from the period of colonization to today’s rapid globalization with poverty incidence of 21.6% as of 2014 (PSA, 2016). Canada, on the other hand, has 9.7% rate of low income but majority of those are transitory. From 2005-2010, only 1.5% are considered in persistent low income (Statistics Canada, 2015 as cited by Lamman, & McIntyre, 2016). Beyond these numbers, there remains a grim reality that faced citizens within the poverty thresholds from both nations.
The wealthy continue to grow as they get more of everything and the lower class continue to get less. The average wealth has increased over the last 50 years, but it has not grown equally for all. “ Families near the bottom of the wealth distribution (those at the 10th percentile) went from having no wealth on average to being
Throughout all of history wealth has never been distributed evenly; no monarchist kingdom, communist utopia, socialistic society, or modern free market has ever existed in a state of equilibrium. The laws of the land have always seemed to operate in a manner of some sort of prejudice. The rich generate wealth at a much higher rate than the poor. Income inequality has existed, in some form or another, since the first trade transaction. Since, we have begun record keeping, statistics show the rich controlling increasing amounts of the total income.
The meaning of the free enterprise on trial means to achieve success by hardwork and taking risks. In his book, “From beyond Outrage”, Robert Reich speaks about how wealth is concentrated among the top wealthiest people in American leading to a wide gap between the rich and poor by increasing inequalities in income. This has not only disgusted Reich, but he is outraged too with the statistics that suggest how the top rich Americans are only getting richer, while those at the bottom of the line are suffering. The inequality gap has grown consistently over the years in America making more than half of the public change their opinion about the wealthy families in U.S. People now believe that those with money need to be taxed heavily and there should be an equal re-distribution of wealth.
If people do not want to become rich then there would be a massive shortage of quality jobs. As stated before, the rich employ many
This simple fact always rings true. The rich rule. If this is so, why is Scrooge not living lavishly and happy, given his abundant wealth. This is because wealth and greed are not the same. In the beginning of this book, Scrooge would rather hassle families and bring misery to the community than to spend the money he already has on a nice Christmas.
The wealthier one gets, it seems, the more one rationalizes their decisions and actions. The more one stains their morality little by little until they no longer need to choose what’s right and wrong but what benefits them. Whether it’s right or wrong is then irrelevant. From people to companies, wealth is the source of
The United States exhibits a wide difference of wealth distribution between rich and poor people, which is larger than any other major developed country.
Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.
The problem with the widened wealth gap is that the inequality may harm the quality. Meaning that those in the higher classes see it as you can use the money with no restrictions. However, economist believe that the “relationship between inequality and economic freedom, with the possibility that policies that are meant to reduce inequality will reduce economic freedom, which will then only make inequality worse.”
The United States exhibits the highest imbalance of wealth distribution than any other major developed nation (Inequality.org). In fact, the richest 160,000 families in America own as much wealth as the poorest 145 million families (Fortune). As the wealth gap increases, more and more individuals are driven into poverty. Unequal wealth distribution also results in a phenomenon known as the cycle of poverty. The cycle of poverty describes instances where families become trapped in poverty for generations due to the restricted access of essential resources, such as education.
If a person has nothing, then he or she is poor. However, what does money have to deal with wealth? There is a difference between being rich and being wealthy, which is the rich have lots of money and the wealth does not worry about the money. There is a saying that “Money can’t buy happiness” which is true. For me, wealth does not mean money, fame, or having everything and anything in the world.
Introduction All over the world, there is an obvious contrast between the living standards and lifestyle of the rich and the poor. Moreover, there is a large gap between the populations of poor and wealthy. This is known as the Wealth Gap, and it is caused by Wealth Inequality. Wealth Income/Inequality is defined as “The unequal distribution of assets within a population.” Wealth is defined as more than just the amount of income a person has, but instead the value of a person’s assets.
Do you ever think of why should or shouldn’t the rich people pay more tax than others? Nowadays, people are arguing about the fairness of paying more tax. Statistics have proven that the rich have paid the majority of U.S. income taxes. A person making $100,000 will pay a higher percentage of his income in taxes than a person making $20,000 for instance. According to the Congressional Budget Office, “The 10% of households with the highest incomes pay more than half of all federal taxes.
This could be explained by saying rich people are more focus on their own goals and desires while poor people have a sensitive mirror neuron system. Likewise, poor people are more focus and capable of recognize danger or what other people might do next when rich people usually do not focus on others at all. This could be explained by saying that the wealthy because they have grown in a financial secure environment they simply do not pay attention to others. They do not do it or they do not recognize the cues because are not adapt to recognize the cues. Both theories could explain and complement each