The play, Inherit the Wind, by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee has caused me to think about how a teacher can impact/influence how a student thinks about important/controversial topics.
Throughout the trials and testimonies, I believe that Howard’s testimony was the most important because he was the child that was given the right to think. This is who the story affects the most because children are still able to change their minds about things as they begin to think more independently whereas adults have pretty much already decided that they believe in creationism and that that is the only way. Teachers have such a big influence on students because they look up to them, and they listen and learn in the classroom every day. Teachers and parents
…show more content…
Kids are taught from a young age about creationism through religion. This means that they never learn anything else. How can anyone have the right to think when they only know one way of thinking? That is what Drummond is trying to talk about in Howard’s testimony. I believe Cates has left a positive impact because he has given them the right to think. He has given them that because he introduced Darwin’s theory of evolution. Students need the type of influence to allow them to form their own opinions. An opinion can only be formed when you know the whole story or else it is biased and not your true opinion. We can’t grow as a society if everyone thinks the same and no one can think differently. In society, we see a lot of controversial subjects and the only way to make an opinion is to listen to all sides of the argument. In Hillsboro, the students only had what they learned from their parents influencing their opinions but Cates was able to allow them to be more open-minded to the other side of the argument. In conclusion, I believe that a teacher can impact/influence how a student thinks about important/controversial topics and this is what gives them the right to think as Drummond explained during the testimony. You only have the right to think when you know the whole truth and nothing is being kept from you, otherwise, you are being forced to accept the only truth that you know. In Hillsboro, most people only accepted creationism because they didn’t have the freedom to think for themselves. They were taught that to think differently from creationism was wrong but that wasn’t the
Wallace concludes his speech by claiming the real value of education is not knowledge, but being aware of what is real. Wallace’s main claim about a liberal arts education, that it exists to teach students how to think, is incorrect; however, he is correct to say that the same experience can mean two different things to two different people, and that learning how to think is being aware of how to exercise control over how you
This gets a little complicated though because students are often not heard or asked their opinions. Feeling like their opinion doesn’t matter is very discouraging to students but the ones that dare to make themselves heard say that is very inspiring to actually get their point across. Betty Jo Jordan, executive assistance to the State Superintendent of West Virginia, said after speaking with a few middle to high school age girls, “I think sometimes we completely ignore the fact that these kids think a lot about a lot of things. We don’t really ask them for their opinions or their ideas on how to make schools better... That was very enlightening.”
Wallace reiterates time and time again that he is not telling these students how they should think; he is reminding them they have to power to change they way the think and view the
Opening minds In one of his Sunday commentaries, Professor Walter Williams of George Mason University wrote that many college professors, mostly liberals, “use their classrooms to proselytize students,” and that this practice is “acceptable at most universities.” I agree with Professor Williams that the beliefs and opinions a professor holds should not become part of classroom discussion. I also agree that using the classroom to force certain beliefs and opinions on students “is nothing less than academic dishonesty.”
For example, students should be able to learn the possibilities of creation and find the evidence they see fit. While on Board, he and Dunbar try to change the science and history curriculum. In the science dispute, there was a bit of a stand still when neither side of the argument could provide factual evidence for human creation. As well as in History, Dunbar encouraged a textbook full of error and fallacy. Some members were confusing fact with opinion and promoting racism against Mexican Americans.