Kohn does not believe that students should cheat but understands why they do. Throughout his whole argument, he provides evidence and examples of why students cheat and explain that students feel more pressured to do well than learn. If the school was more about learning and less about how well a student performs on a standardized test at the end of the year, cheating would be less of a
On the flip side, simple mistakes or a bad day can lead to bad results. A student may deem the entire year a failure if he or she failed that one test. Continue that trend for a few years, and school itself seems useless. If school is useless, why waste time there? According to the results Audrey Amrein and David Berliner recorded, “sixty-three percent of the states with high school graduation tests posted decreases in the average age of students who took the GED exam after the high-stakes tests were implemented” (“The Effects on High-Stakes Testing…”).
My school would greatly benefit from the application of an honor code as long as such a code is approved by the student body. Such an honor code would bring about students to reconsider their actions before cheating on a test. This is because an honor code has the ability to create a culture among students which discourages cheating. Also, including harsh punishments within the honor code would dishearten students from cheating out of fear of potential consequences. Schools which have not benefited from honor codes are very different from Classical, and therefore do not prove that an honor code would be ineffective at Classical.
The results show that 65 highschool students cheated . With the non athletes 60 cheat” (Project Fact File 161). This shows that Athletes cheat more so they don 't fail the class. Therefore if there wasn’t a “No pass no play” rule Athletes wouldn’t cheat as much. Some may differ and think that the reason why kids cheat is that of all the
Standardized tests were a waste of time to not only the student, but also the instructor. They claimed to have measured a student’s success and progress, but the results were quite inaccurate. Unless students had taken the same test at the beginning of the year, then how could a single test result determine whether students improved? Regardless, student success should be measured by the educator and overall improvement and not by a single, inaccurate result. As a solution, standardized testing should be eliminated from US public schools regarding the evidence that they were a major stress creator, the test does not affect the participant or instructor, and the results were an inaccurate measurement of student success.
I guess I will choose that colleges should not enforce a curve on grades because that is cheating and most colleges have a law or prohibition on cheating. In a way this is some colleges cheating in ranking and on grades. Sometimes it’s not really about the grades, but the knowledge that students are able to bring with them and apply it to their future job. Colleges are supposed to prep students for the world ahead of them and help
For instance, there are many people who simply do not perform well on tests. Many students are smart and understand the content, but it doesn't show on test scores (Gregory J. Cizek, 2001). In essence, testing brings out stress in even the brightest of students, messing with their heads come test day. The facts show that from the 50 states, 700 school districts claim that standardardized tests are causing greater anxiety than the average everyday assessments (Joseph Spector, 2015). In conclusion, student achievement
The money that we’re wasting on standardized tests could go to helping these students, but it’s practically thrown away. There needs to be a better use for this money. Not only are these tests a waste of money, but they’re also a waste of time. Standardized tests take between 20 to 25 hours out of the school year, but the amount of time that students spend studying for them is immeasurable. Students do not learn anything during the testing process.
This is at the college level and and only 48 percent of people think it is enforced fairly so, let's think about the high school level where the 48 would be even lower. There is barely any penalty and it needs to have a hold over the classroom otherwise students are going to be fearless and start to cheat because it is all about the good grades in order to go get into the top college if it means cheating to get there people will do it and I personally have seen it. I have heard siri go off during exams and nothing happened and so, this is why there has to be some sort of fear within high school to prepare students to not waste thousands of dollars for something as simple as not cheating and understanding that it is terrifying to be in the position of
But on the other hand, it may make kids like sports for the trophy, not the sport, and they will eventually realise that they don’t actually like sports and that may lower their confidence and self-esteem. Additionally, to stop kids from liking sports just because of the trophy, not for the actual sport and it doesn’t help and to help them prepare for life in the real world, kids should not get trophies for participation. You may not have a kid or kid in sports but it is still important to teach yourself and others how to earn your achievements, not to get them handed to